Sure you can, just like I can have an opinion of your opinion. And my opinion is that someone who has never played any BF other than a little of the broken BF4 beta, and that being on the xbox, shouldn't opine too forcefully on the PC version of the game. This is a gaming forum and if your opinion insults someone's game of choice, chances are they are gonna come back at ya.Keep taking my statements of opinion, claiming they're begin presented as fact, and enjoy the results of twisting words.
I never claimed to know everything about Battlefield ANYTHING. I said that I don't like the idea of 32-on-32 because I don't trust strangers to cooperate, and I've played enough games (and don't take "primarily Xbox" to mean "entirely Xbox," though I know you like to deal in absolutes) in 4-on-4 settings to know that I don't like putting TOO Much trust in strangers. If I am 1/32 of the team, I am putting 96.875% (31/32) of the match into the hands of strangers, and I just don't trust that. My ENTIRE POINT is that I don't like massive games because I don't like playing with swarms of strangers.
Heck, playing WoW in a guild (for the record, never done the clan thing in shooters, I just don't like it), I didn't like trusting the people I played with. We'd do a 10-man raid, and we'd have folks be terrible at their jobs (and this is from someone who was never all that great at the game himself). Playing TF2 in a 12-on-12 setting, I'd get frustrated when 50% of the team was a Sniper or a Spy (and I recognize that a lot of those instances are console gamers taking advantage of the F2P existence of TF2 now). It's just a matter of strangers have proven time and time again to be untrustworthy, so I don't care for a massive game where my contributions can mean so little.
But I guess since I don't play Battlefield in a competitive clan, I'm not entitled to an opinion, in your world.
Trust me I know how frustrating it can be to play with a bunch of random morons. Thats why mainly stick to TDM or Domination if no BF4 friends are online, that way I can be more of an influence on the game or just pad my own stats if the team really blows. No need to let them take me down with them, right?
I dont consider a 64 player server a massive game though, and like I said earlier, BF4's maps really arent that large. Most maps have 2-3 flags that can be covered on foot. I consider 32-48 players the sweet spot for most of the Large Conquest maps. Then again if you are comparing it to a 3v3 game, I can see why you may think differently.