somebody with a well thought out view.. far to many gamers never played FPS before it and felt its the Holy grail.. and for consoles it was.. in the respect it was simply the best playing FPS on a console. but as far as FPS go.. it was pretty dull to anybody who had played them on PC (face it, at the time FPS didnt work on consoles so there where almost none to compare it to, pretty easy to win a contest when your the only entry).. 2 weapons? while the "carry and arsenal" on your back was 100% unrealistic it made for far more varied gameplay (fun) and way less "busy time" making sure weapons had ammo and such. The regenerating shield.. I was very much in the HATE area on this orginally.. but Now i think Halo got it right and everybody who copied it got it wrong. Health dont heal, shields do .. nowdays even health heals overtime,in seconds.. very poor game mechanic.. Health packs sitting all over was silly (no argument on that) but haveing unlimted health if i sit and hide is very .. sad.... hence HALO regenrating shield and non regenrating health (without health packs) might be the best system so far...
halos same 4 inside block sets isand the cartoon like little guys..game has death and temates dying around you, an evil race bent on killing you and we have the 3 stooges shooting at us and gigling away? sorry, poor game design.
halo inovated the health shield system and made FPS Work (great) on consoles.. but otherwise.. its pretty average shooter. ANd for those who love it.. who cares what I think.. keep on enjoying it. thats what games are for. Im just experessing an opinion, not facts..