Han Solo: A Star Wars Story

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
It is too bad Lucas didn't sell out earlier. The guy is a creative genius but he stayed around for too long.

Like, a standalone Solo movie would have been awesome in 1988. Lucas should have delegated responsibility for Star Wars to a trusted lieutenant.

As it is, all of the original trilogy callbacks in the new films coming out just fall flat. Those movies were like 35 years ago. It makes about as much sense as making another ET movie.

Star Wars right now IMO needs to create new aesthetics and stop doing the nostalgia thing.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
It is too bad Lucas didn't sell out earlier. The guy is a creative genius but he stayed around for too long.

Like, a standalone Solo movie would have been awesome in 1988. Lucas should have delegated responsibility for Star Wars to a trusted lieutenant.

As it is, all of the original trilogy callbacks in the new films coming out just fall flat. Those movies were like 35 years ago. It makes about as much sense as making another ET movie.

Star Wars right now IMO needs to create new aesthetics and stop doing the nostalgia thing.
Unfortunately that's all we are going to get. I would have loved another trilogy and that's all. No we didn't need a prequel showing how the Death Star got its fatal flaw or a Han Solo origin story. This is all just diluting the Star Wars universe. Too much of something doesn't make it good. We are getting a Star Wars movie every year for the foreseeable future.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
I'm totally cool with expanded universe type stories such as Rogue 1 (And I don't mean EU from the nerdy books that all the geeks read). There's a million awesome stories that could be told within the scope of the universe. BUT, Han Solo shouldn't be one of them. Either it will be completely polarizing and offensive to at least 50% of star wars fans, and therefore lame. Or it will be so totally milquetoast to avoid offending anyone that it'll be completely pointless.

Or the absolute worst thing will happen - it'll be tailored towards children ala Jar Jar, and it could completely taint the Han Solo character for all time.
 
Reactions: Homerboy

Majes

Golden Member
Apr 8, 2008
1,164
148
106
Unfortunately that's all we are going to get. I would have loved another trilogy and that's all. No we didn't need a prequel showing how the Death Star got its fatal flaw or a Han Solo origin story. This is all just diluting the Star Wars universe. Too much of something doesn't make it good. We are getting a Star Wars movie every year for the foreseeable future.

I thought Rogue One was a fantastic story. Anything that can be done with minimal input from the original characters is okay by me. Another actor as Han is going to be too jarring for the majority of fans though. I will go see it... But it's fairly likely it will be the first Star Wars Title that I don't purchase. Rogue One will be a day one buy for me though. That movie was awesome.
 
Reactions: Homerboy

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
I disagreed with Han being killed in EPVII.

Such a bad idea. It makes his character a lot less fun, much more serious and tragic, which is *not* what the smuggler is supposed to be. Smuggler is supposed to be the secular cynical businessman. Tragic noble deaths should only come for the mythical swordsman. Han being killed makes about as much sense as Indiana Jones being killed.

So I mean, that bridge has already been crossed. I think a young Han Solo movie could be fun. But there are so many of these things coming out and let's be honest the quality has suffered so much, that I'll probably wait on it.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,856
4,974
126
I'm totally cool with expanded universe type stories such as Rogue 1 (And I don't mean EU from the nerdy books that all the geeks read). There's a million awesome stories that could be told within the scope of the universe. BUT, Han Solo shouldn't be one of them. Either it will be completely polarizing and offensive to at least 50% of star wars fans, and therefore lame. Or it will be so totally milquetoast to avoid offending anyone that it'll be completely pointless.

Or the absolute worst thing will happen - it'll be tailored towards children ala Jar Jar, and it could completely taint the Han Solo character for all time.

Agreed 100%

I've said it a thousand times already -- nobody is asking for this story to be told. What made Solo great was his mysteriousness and elusiveness. When we learn his story, no matter how cool it may be, it's going to diminish Solo's appeal. Remember when we leaned Boba Fett's backstory? Yeah, how'd that work out? Ugh.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
Would rather have a Boba Fett movie where he never takes off his mask like in Dredd.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,806
29,557
146
oh nice, I hope it dies somehow (lol, right)

....and whothefuck invited Woody Harrelson? How many bong hits did it take to get him to appear for that photo?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,806
29,557
146
I disagreed with Han being killed in EPVII.

Such a bad idea. It makes his character a lot less fun, much more serious and tragic, which is *not* what the smuggler is supposed to be. Smuggler is supposed to be the secular cynical businessman. Tragic noble deaths should only come for the mythical swordsman. Han being killed makes about as much sense as Indiana Jones being killed.

So I mean, that bridge has already been crossed. I think a young Han Solo movie could be fun. But there are so many of these things coming out and let's be honest the quality has suffered so much, that I'll probably wait on it.

probably has nothing to do with story. Ford very likely only agreed to do that film if he would be killed, such is his life-long stance on the Star Wars universe...and good for him. I wish I had that power.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Rumor that they may be trying to get Ron Howard to be the replacement.
 

local

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2011
1,851
512
136
My hopes for this one are only slightly higher than my hopes that the next time I see one of the prequels that I will love it. Rogue One set the bar for any new movie and I honestly don't think they will be able to meet it.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,612
3,458
136
Looks like Ron Howard signed on. They could do worse, but I wonder what difference it makes if filming is almost done?
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
that's insane.
why wait till the movie is almost completed to fire him?
now there's probably going to be tons of reshoots with the new director.

heck, scrap the old directors movie and start over?


Which won't be new. Majority of the Rogue One trailer wasn't in the released version.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,518
5,340
136
that's insane.
why wait till the movie is almost completed to fire him?
now there's probably going to be tons of reshoots with the new director.

heck, scrap the old directors movie and start over?

The first article I read was more in favor of the original directors & made the producer out to be the bad guy:

http://variety.com/2017/film/news/star-wars-han-solo-kathleen-kennedy-director-fired-1202473919/

Miller and Lord were stunned to find that they were not being granted freedom to run the production in the manner that they were accustomed to. They balked at Kennedy’s tight control on the set.

...

“It was a culture clash from day one,” the source said. “She didn’t even like the way they folded their socks.”

The source said that while Lord and Miller were supposedly hired for their vision and distinctive brand of filmmaking when it came to the “Star Wars” production, Kennedy did not approve of their shooting style and process of interacting with actors and crew. “They weren’t given the leeway to do what they had to do,” the source said.

...

“Kathy, her team and Larry Kasdan have been doing it their way for a very long time. They know how the cheese is made and that’s how they want it made,” said the source. “It became a very polarizing set.”

However, then I read this article:

https://moviepilot.com/p/alden-ehrenreich-warned-lucasfilm-han-solo-directors/4302909

Here's the catch, though. According to StarWarsNewsNet, as production went on, Ehrenreich felt increasingly uncomfortable. Lord and Miller were pushing a Star Wars film unlike any other, with a strong element of screwball comedy. One Lucasfilm insider actually compared it to Jim Carrey's performance in Ace Ventura, and something about it just wasn't sitting comfortably with Ehrenreich, StarWarsNewsNet reports.

Finally, he had enough. Ehrenreich raised his concerns with one of the film's producers, who let Lucasfilm head Kathleen Kennedy know about it; in light of Ehrenreich's concerns, Kennedy decided to review the existing footage, according to the report.

...

The film wasn't faithful to Lawrence Kasdan's original script, with a high degree of improv and a zany tone that just didn't seem to fit the Galaxy Far, Far Away.

Intriguingly, one insider told StarWarsNewsNet that there was even a continuity error that would have driven the fans wild, and Lord and Miller wouldn't budge on it.

So it really sounds like the directors were pushing their own agenda too far:

Lucasfilm seems to have called a hiatus on production — for a couple weeks while Ron Howard gets up to speed, Entertainment Weekly reports — and the company will have to order extensive reshoots. Whereas Gareth Edwards was willing to cooperate with Rogue One, Lord and Miller insisted on their own creative control. It's presumably at this point that Lord tweeted:

...

By all accounts, Lucasfilm gave Lord and Miller an ultimatum — our way or the highway — and the duo wanted to do the film their way. "They thought they were brought on to make a Phil and Chris movie," a source close to the directors told EW, adding that they don't feel any anger at Ron Howard: "Somebody has to take over the movie."

In an ironic touch, screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan, who encouraged Lucasfilm to hire the duo in the first place, reportedly pushed hard for their dismissal.

I understand wanting to be creative in their own vein, but they also have to realize that (1) they are extending out an existing, beloved franchise, and (2) they are working for Disney now. That means being flexible to set things up for future movies, family-friendliness, a toy & merchandising lineup, upcoming rides & attractions, and so on. If the lead actor even went as far as complaining to the producer, then it must have gotten pretty bad. Also, after reading up on the producer, she seems pretty dang legit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Kennedy_(producer)#Filmography

Her production chops start in the early 80's: Indiana Jones, Gremlins, Back to the Future, The Goonies, Money Pit, Land Before Time, Jurassic Park, Twister, plus all of the newest Star Wars movies (TFW, Rogue One, Last Jedi). That's like 35+ years of producing awesome movies. I'm gonna side with the producer on this one. Plus Ron Howard is a great director, with movies like Willow and Apollo 13 under his belt. I hope they pull it off...The Force Awakens was pretty fun & while I didn't particularly care for Rogue One's ending, it was a fun show for the ride.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,831
34,770
136
I'm going to go ahead and give Kathleen Kennedy the benefit of the doubt here. I always thought those guys were kind of an oddball choice for this but sometimes that works out.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,175
5,641
146
Much like anyone signing on to do any of these "extended universe" movies should know that they're going to be very hamstrung and not have lots of creative control, I just cannot fathom that the directors were that surprised. It honestly sounds like they were probably given far more than expected and then showed exactly why the studios don't do that on these. It sounds like they were making a comedy homage, kinda like GalaxyQuest to Star Trek. Which that could be fun, but they're not going to let that fly right now. They literally just darkened the franchise up with Rogue One.

I'm totally cool with expanded universe type stories such as Rogue 1 (And I don't mean EU from the nerdy books that all the geeks read). There's a million awesome stories that could be told within the scope of the universe. BUT, Han Solo shouldn't be one of them. Either it will be completely polarizing and offensive to at least 50% of star wars fans, and therefore lame. Or it will be so totally milquetoast to avoid offending anyone that it'll be completely pointless.

Or the absolute worst thing will happen - it'll be tailored towards children ala Jar Jar, and it could completely taint the Han Solo character for all time.

Ugh, have fun bitching an moaning when you find out how much it will straight up ruin Star Wars for you. Remember, according to their universe, the prequels are canon. They will almost certainly try to right those wrongs at some point. And sorry but Star Wars is actually ridiculously shallow material to work from (with lots of flaws that made the original films endearing, but will make elaborating on things a total fucking mess, personally I think it already has and that people are just blinding themselves to it, but you can see people realizing it already as just look at how feelings towards Episode 7 have already changed and how people after losing the afterglow are seeing the massive problems with Rogue One), fleshing it out is not going to end well, much like it has not ended well for pretty much any other franchise.

I don't think people really understand how limited Star Wars really was. They really should have just done their own thing and just have vague connections. Tell an entirely different era, have people reference characters or find little easter eggs and things, but trying to add more is just asking for disaster.

It really baffles me that they go "yeah the Star Wars universe was shit, we're going to ignore pretty much all of it, now let us flesh it out, it'll be sooo much better!" and people are buying in. It will end up the same way.

I disagreed with Han being killed in EPVII.

Such a bad idea. It makes his character a lot less fun, much more serious and tragic, which is *not* what the smuggler is supposed to be. Smuggler is supposed to be the secular cynical businessman. Tragic noble deaths should only come for the mythical swordsman. Han being killed makes about as much sense as Indiana Jones being killed.

So I mean, that bridge has already been crossed. I think a young Han Solo movie could be fun. But there are so many of these things coming out and let's be honest the quality has suffered so much, that I'll probably wait on it.

Han's character arc in the original movies is one of the most important, its right up there with Luke and Vader. While it was actually overblown, as he really didn't change that much, it was still important. He went from being a vagabond focused on his own interests to being reliable and selfless. That is already a pretty serious change. He was never the "cynical businessman" not even in the original trilogy. They tried to bill him as such, but very little of his actions supported that other than they tried to establish that he was that way prior to encountering Luke and then minor characterization to play foil for the plot (first he has to be cynical of the Force, then he has to pretend to leave when his part of the deal is done). I honestly have no idea why they tried to re-establish that in Ep7 either, as it made no fucking sense and shit all over one of the primary things that made the original trilogy good.

I agree that I think Han is handled very poorly in Force Awakens, but I disagree about the outcome. I just think they needed to handle that better. I think it could have made for interesting development for Kylo Ren, but they had to pull stupid "we have to have a father twist!" idiocy. Why would they think Han's plea with Kylo mattered when they basically act like Han's been an absentee father? And then they even fuck that up. Kylo himself treats him as just part of his development, meaning it was like Han had no actual emotional connection with him. He didn't kill Han in anger or even with any real malice (didn't even seem to care that Han wasn't in his life), he did it because he thought that was just something he had to do to achieve Vader like ability. Sure they had the Fallout Boy roll tear but come on that scene was a fucking joke.

I think if you're unhappy about them making an old Han less fun, you shouldn't be optimistic about where things are going to go based on how they're changing things, judging by how Rogue One went (and is lauded for going dark).

Agreed 100%

I've said it a thousand times already -- nobody is asking for this story to be told. What made Solo great was his mysteriousness and elusiveness. When we learn his story, no matter how cool it may be, it's going to diminish Solo's appeal. Remember when we leaned Boba Fett's backstory? Yeah, how'd that work out? Ugh.

Agreed. But I honestly feel that way about the entirety of Star Wars. I genuinely think that people will eventually look back on this era as every bit as bad as the prequels because they intentionally set out to try and not do the same thing the prequels did, but will end up accomplishing the same thing. Which is reveal the follies in trying to flesh out a universe that is only there to serve as a backdrop to a fairly shallow storyline, and the things they're doing to try to make it continue to work just reveal that, and also are going to end up shitting all over the good parts of the originals. The prequels real failing was not the greenscreen CGI junk (it just highlighted the problem with what they were actually doing), it was that they ruined the characters. We already had all that we needed of and for the characters in the original trilogy. They weren't even deep characters, which is why it worked well, they were shallow cliche characters and were well cast.

The new characters in the Force Awakens were decent, and the best thing about it, unfortunately they're tying it too much to the original. Rogue One on the other hand tries way too hard to add more of the original, at the expense of characters (no new ones worth a damn, not that it matters they're all dead now anyway, they were literally throwaway characters, but hey we get more Tarkin...), essentially just trying to serve as a character build for Vader ("look how badass and evil he is!") which actually doesn't jive well with the original, and hurts the aura that the original trilogy built. Sure its not as bad as CGI Yoda bouncing off the walls and flipping like he's Sonic the Hedgehog mixed with Mario, but it really is doing the same thing and is completely unnecessary. Monsters are scarier the less of them you actually see. Not to mention it makes his redemption harder to accept.

probably has nothing to do with story. Ford very likely only agreed to do that film if he would be killed, such is his life-long stance on the Star Wars universe...and good for him. I wish I had that power.

From what I've gathered, it was literally a requirement. And he wished he'd insisted on it decades ago. And I can fully understand why. Star Wars Fans. The best solace though is how the old addage of be careful what you wish for is going to crash over them eventually.

My hopes for this one are only slightly higher than my hopes that the next time I see one of the prequels that I will love it. Rogue One set the bar for any new movie and I honestly don't think they will be able to meet it.

I hope by "set the bar" you mean low. Rogue One is mediocre as all get out, but it is setting up that they are going to full on shit all over the originals by trying to flesh out things that don't need fleshed out and in no way help. It makes Leia into a Donald Trump level lying political jackass moron ("I'm on a diplomatic mission, I mean sure you literally just saw my ship a few minutes ago perfectly refuting that, also well guess that whole bit about us intercepting your transmission makes no sense now either..."). Also, the original trilogy wasn't that dark. And changing the tone is going to seriously fuck things up.
 

local

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2011
1,851
512
136
I hope by "set the bar" you mean low. Rogue One is mediocre as all get out, but it is setting up that they are going to full on shit all over the originals by trying to flesh out things that don't need fleshed out and in no way help. It makes Leia into a Donald Trump level lying political jackass moron ("I'm on a diplomatic mission, I mean sure you literally just saw my ship a few minutes ago perfectly refuting that, also well guess that whole bit about us intercepting your transmission makes no sense now either..."). Also, the original trilogy wasn't that dark. And changing the tone is going to seriously fuck things up.

Unlike some people I have no problem with it. When Tarkin arrived they did detect the transmission but they didn't see the plans being delivered and Tarkin blew up the base so there was no way to track it there. At best they could have found out that the plans were on the Profundity and had been copied or transferred at which point there was only one place they could have gone. Then in the original when Vader catches the Tantive IV there are certain rules has still has to follow. Vader is not the Emperor and the senate still exists at the point so when confronting the Senator he has to present his "evidence" that they know the stolen plans were transferred to that ship. If Leia had admitted guilt then whatever due process she had coming was forfeit.

My two main gripes about Rogue One were the unnecessary Vader choke pun and when Tarkin fired at Scarif base I don't think that meant clip the top of it and have the impact zone be 30 miles away. There may be something else but that is all I can think of off the top of my head.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |