Here's what we'll do. We'll play a game called "prove it." In this game, you get to play your turn until you can prove your point.
I'll be nice enough to let you go first.
I'll check back in about 20,000 years when you have some evidence that actually proves something
Aww, someone's awfully deflective and afraid to provide their evidence that somehow proves the unified scientific community wrong.
Guess who gets the first crack at proving they're correct: the one trying to disprove what "science" universally says, which in no uncertain terms, is that the global mean temperature is in fact rising.
The only data correctly up for debate revolves around the man-made aspect. Comically enough, the scientific community is in agreement - some agreeing to disagree, so typical of scientists - with the notion that mankind has contributed if not outright caused current events.
The other points in the discussion involve just what is going to be the results, which will likely impact everyone in a different way.
I'm not going to waste my time digging up the peer-reviewed articles, just as I would not do the same to prove to you gravity is real.