Hardwareanalysis bench are fake

[Biatche1488]

They are FAKE some site said it its just a x800xtpe overclock
They did that because they are not invite at the official lauch
Just look at the half life 2 result 512mb+600mz+new architecture+faster memory+16shader+512bitringbus+youre all blind those bench are fake
And they dont talk about shader model 3 in splinter cell
And where they got there drivers we dont now they build them
The only card availble at this time its the x1800xl ati big partners can only get x800xl at this time

 

[Biatche1488]

Source from this site http://www.clubic.com/actualite-22498-l...s-benchs-du-radeon-x1800-truques-.html

 

[ginfest]

:roll::laugh::roll::laugh:

 

[Ackmed]

The smart ones already thought this.

Its the ignorant ones that jumped in head first thinking that they were real.

 

[yhelothar]

The site saying it's fake is fake.

 

[jiffylube1024]

Originally posted by: virtualgames0
The site saying it's fake is fake.

Close. The site saying it's fake is french.

 

[ddogg]

Originally posted by: virtualgames0
The site saying it's fake is fake.

lol nice one

 

[yhelothar]

Originally posted by: jiffylube1024

Originally posted by: virtualgames0
The site saying it's fake is fake.

Close. The site saying it's fake is french.

non! non!1 c'est impossible! encule! baiser-moi!

 

[Biatche1488]

cool 1 on 10000 guy is smart in this forum (ackmed)

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: Biatche1488
cool 1 on 10000 guy is smart in this forum (ackmed)

You only believe it's fake because you want it to be fake. Hey, don't worry, this is going to be a common thing until the "real" benches are released. Hopefully OCT 5th.

Keep the faith. Miracles do sometimes happen.

 

[nRollo]

Originally posted by: Ackmed
The smart ones already thought this.

Its the ignorant ones that jumped in head first thinking that they were real.

Nice try Ackie!

Fortunately you and a 12 post member saying "Those can't be real and anyone who thinks they are is just a big poopie head!" isn't enough to discredit the website's info.

Neither of you has offered any links to another website that refutes the benchmarks as proof of your allegations? Why should we take your word over the Hardware Analysis?

ATI has some very good reasons to post that the benchmarks are fake, as they don't exactly portray their upcoming products in a very favorable light. (and they may be trying to sell off the rest of their stock before it totally tanks)

ATI could be scrambling to wring more performance out their parts before their "launch" and not want us to see where they're at now?

Did ATI tell us about the 16X12 at 60Hz limitation of their crappy multi-GPU pseudo-solution? No. We had to learn about it from Rage3d and Penstarsys.

Did ATI tell us about their insider trading antics? No. We had to wait for all the lawsuits to become public record.

Did ATI tell us they had trilinear optomizations in their drivers now? No. We had to get it from the web.

Did ATI tell us of their application specific "optomiztions" for 3dMark? No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about their application specific "optomizations" for the 8500? (Quack) No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about the "trylinear" optomizations? No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about their insider trading a few years ago? No. We had to see them convicted of it and paying $900,000. in fines.

Etc ad infinitum.

The fact of the matter is that ATI has a long history of misleading the public. I don't particularly care as I'm only interested in their video cards, but don't make it out like they're some outraged "innocents" looking out for the public welfare denouncing the only benchmark info we have at this point. :roll:

 

[malG]

Benchmarks aside (lets say X1800XT performance is similar to 7800GTX), who in their right mind would spend an extra $150 for an ATI X1800XT at this point?

 

[rbV5]

Originally posted by: Rollo

Originally posted by: Ackmed
The smart ones already thought this.

Its the ignorant ones that jumped in head first thinking that they were real.

Nice try Ackie!

Fortunately you and a 12 post member saying "Those can't be real and anyone who thinks they are is just a big poopie head!" isn't enough to discredit the website's info.

Neither of you has offered any links to another website that refutes the benchmarks as proof of your allegations? Why should we take your word over the Hardware Analysis?

ATI has some very good reasons to post that the benchmarks are fake, as they don't exactly portray their upcoming products in a very favorable light. (and they may be trying to sell off the rest of their stock before it totally tanks)

ATI could be scrambling to wring more performance out their parts before their "launch" and not want us to see where they're at now?

Did ATI tell us about the 16X12 at 60Hz limitation of their crappy multi-GPU pseudo-solution? No. We had to learn about it from Rage3d and Penstarsys.

Did ATI tell us about their insider trading antics? No. We had to wait for all the lawsuits to become public record.

Did ATI tell us they had trilinear optomizations in their drivers now? No. We had to get it from the web.

Did ATI tell us of their application specific "optomiztions" for 3dMark? No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about their application specific "optomizations" for the 8500? (Quack) No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about the "trylinear" optomizations? No. We had to learn it on the web.

Did ATI tell us about their insider trading a few years ago? No. We had to see them convicted of it and paying $900,000. in fines.

Etc ad infinitum.

The fact of the matter is that ATI has a long history of misleading the public. I don't particularly care as I'm only interested in their video cards, but don't make it out like they're some outraged "innocents" looking out for the public welfare denouncing the only benchmark info we have at this point. :roll:

Look to Nvidia for theTruth


fixed link

 

[nRollo]

Originally posted by: malG
Benchmarks aside (lets say X1800XT performance is similar to 7800GTX), who in their right mind would spend an extra $150 for an ATI X1800XT at this point?

This is a pretty good point. Why would anyone spend more for the same performance on a rev1 product with 50% fewer pipelines, and higher power/heat?

 

[nRollo]

Originally posted by: Biatche1488
cool 1 on 10000 guy is smart in this forum (ackmed)

You are new here, an interesting way to make a first impression:

Waah. Only Ackmed is smart! The rest of you are stupid!

I find your name oddly appropriate.

 

[ddogg]

pawned

 

[ddogg]

i wonder how that card will perform on a lower spec system, that was supposedly tested on a FX57, the GTX's higher specs may pull it in front.

 

[lavaheadache]

Here is another link stating that the benches are fake. http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=3069

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: lavaheadache
Here is another link stating that the benches are fake. http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=3069

"This is a complete hoax - done with an OC'd X850, we think"

Done.

 

[lavaheadache]

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003

Originally posted by: lavaheadache
Here is another link stating that the benches are fake. http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=3069

"This is a complete hoax - done with an OC'd X850, we think"

Done.

I'm not saying that Iam buying in to the BS I'm just adding fuel to the controversy

 

[yhelothar]

Originally posted by: rbV5

Look to Nvidia for theTruth


fixed link

lol that's some pretty good 0wnage

 

[nRollo]

Originally posted by: lavaheadache
Here is another link stating that the benches are fake. http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=3069

Like I said, what is ATI going to say? They don't know for sure. You can bet their board makers have R520 chips if they're supposedly launching product in a few weeks. I seriously doubt they can ramp up production of a whole new product overnight?

 

[ddogg]

impossible...

what would be interesting to note is the availability of these products. if the XT performs like this but is rare and sells for $800+ it would be disasterous.

 

[Wreckage]

Originally posted by: lavaheadache
Here is another link stating that the benches are fake. http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=3069

ATI's (Chris Hook) first reaction to this article was: " Fiction. I don't believe these numbers were ever run on a 520 ".

And then a second response (from Chris) came in:

"This is a complete hoax - done with an OC'd X850, we think. Call our partners yourself and ask if they have R520XTs in house. The numbers aren't even close."

So the R520 is supposed to launch in 2 weeks and none of their partners have a R520XT yet?

Sounds like they have more issues than just leaked benchmarks.

 

[tuteja1986]

yeah that is some pretty huge blow to ATI.

First it?s little hard to believe ATI would choose a silicon that would limit the resolution. I am also wondering who makes all these hardware decisions because ATI to me is totally screwing up. If what all these websites are saying is any true then ATI is like talking a set backwards and I wouldn?t expect that from a good respectable (in hardware wise) company. ATI has totally lost it if they are making really sloppy decisions. When I knew ATI would delay R520 I was thinking at least they would make it run (should to me) faster than 7800GTX. I still have some question like ?WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO 32PIPELINE?? Also NVIDIA attacking ATI is kind of a joke because NVIDIA wouldn't launch an assault like this unless they were pretty sure they had reasonably reliable information about there competitor product. Anyways NVIDIA comment on the new ATI new Motherboards was kind of lame. I do really like the ATI Motherboard for its Disk controllers. But I am really disappointed with ATI and I don?t want them to die because it will mean NVIDIA claiming total power and that thought gives me the creeps.