He's not thinking. He's merely believing. He probably owns Arizona oceanfront that he's never seen.
I don't disagree that we need that, but a serious question for you. What on Earth makes you think Trump will do that, or even attempt it?
Or has any fucking clue on how to do it?I don't disagree that we need that, but a serious question for you. What on Earth makes you think Trump will do that, or even attempt it?
Or has any fucking clue on how to do it?
Holy shit... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAI have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.
Holy shit... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.
sorry I don't have the time or energy to spend digging up the dozens of malicious things drumpf has said and done during this campaign. Plus, it's likely you'd dismiss them, as you've clearly put some serious blinders on anyway.Your response is typical of how Clinton is conducting her campaign. So your delivery of a mocking response, instead of providing any resemblance of an intelligent one, proves my point.
I have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.
I have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.
In thinking about it, you have a point. I have to clarify and say that Clinton is running the dirtiest presidential campaign with a candidate's public and overt approval.Your first election?
In thinking about it, you have a point. I have to clarify and say that Clinton is running the dirtiest presidential campaign with a candidate's public and overt approval.
Why do you think this way?In thinking about it, you have a point. I have to clarify and say that Clinton is running the dirtiest presidential campaign with a candidate's public and overt approval.
I think there is a very real sea shift. It may not be permanent--it's always possible to rise above it--but that will take some time and the damage is clearly done. This has already been happening for some time as the GOP has long pandered to these elements: exploiting their fears for votes all the while praying that these same people would just remain as quite as possible, as long as their miserable lives could be adequately explained away by the underhanded machinations of others: blacky and brownie, muslims, jews, liberals. You know, the worst of the worst. I'm not saying this is the republican party, but it is the dependable base that will always vote for them and has been doing so repeatedly for decades now. It isn't controversial, either.
But now they are louder and they are even angrier--and rightfully so--of course their target both remains the same but has also now been turned against the hand that has fed them for so long, so shamelessly. And the liberals are to blame as well, for being so complacent and so willing to accept that these people's frustrations can so easily be explained away by their racism, their ignorance--that they are unhappy for unreasonable reasons so, in the end, aren't really relevant so it isn't worth courting them.
For several consistent cycles, now, it seems we are always telling ourselves that it really can't get worse than this! But it always does, every cycle. Let's hope that this is rock bottom, but I would be shocked if it isn't. When societies go through this type of civil rancor, returning to normalcy means a decent into "interesting times," which certainly isn't something that anyone wants, despite how many of us seem so restless while living in stable, reasonable, "boring times."
I think much hinges on what becomes of the so-called "Trump conservatives" after this election, what becomes of their leader--does he retreat back into normal, civilian life and try to save his brand, or does he pivot to this alt-right icon industry and keep this consitutency going, sewing fear and resentment in these people, convincing them that the Modern USA is a dystopian farce where the true patriots are the ones being punished, their blood and sweat harvested for the betterment of "the elite" that always there to ridicule and impoverish them. It also remains to be seen if both the GOP successfully realigns to become a more moderate, truly conservative coalition of adults and if the Dems and liberals can manage to effectively address the complaints of these very same people.
In the end, it doesn't really matter if large swatch of the population base their fears in fantasy and unreasonable assumptions about the economy and about modern democracy--their pain is still very real to them. Trump is the only one that seems to be speaking to them directly. So what if he's just feeding the beast and exploiting those fears, only making it worse for them in the end? They're clearly here and they are clearly looking to be heard.
Has Trump forever dumbed down American politics?
Oddly enough it was already pretty dumbed down. Nobody talked about anything of significance. When was the last time you heard about the carried interest tax in a debate?
Alot of the stuff the rich would prefer to stay out of the lime-light has been dragged wayyyyy out into the open, including their lifestyles.
I guess you guys would prefer the debates go back to the old style where you just get lied to the whole time.
Your response is typical of how Clinton is conducting her campaign. So your delivery of a mocking response, instead of providing any resemblance of an intelligent one, proves my point.
Exactly... I have been saying this all along > Trump is not the problem with the republican party, Trump is a symptom of the problem with the republican party. That problem being the large portion (I think somewhere between 1/4 and 1/2 of the party) are uneducated, racist, xenophobe, evangelicals (in various mixes) that take no responsibility for their own lives and want to blame all of their problems on brown people, other immigrants, and/or liberals rather than taking ownership of their own lives.
I have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.
I have never seen a dirtier presidential campaign conducted than by Clinton. I think she has changed how campaigns will be run in the US going forward. That's my answer to the question that the OP should have asked.