Haswell-e prices leaking

[Redstorm]

Looks like Amazon have got the gouge meter out.

5960X - $1199.99 @ http://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-5960X...BX80648I75960X

5960X - $1079 @ http://www.macmall.com/p/Intel-Boxed...24~pdp.iifbgfb

5930K- $674.99 @ http://www.amazon.com/Intel-Haswell-...BX80648I75930K

5930K- $617.99 @ http://www.macmall.com/p/Intel-Boxed...48~pdp.iifbbhf

5820k - $449.99 @ http://www.amazon.com/Intel-Haswell-...BX80648I75820K

5820k - $412 @ http://www.macmall.com/p/Intel-Boxed...47~pdp.iifbbhe

 

[VirtualLarry]

It's a shame that the 5820 has its PCI-E lane count neutered.

 

[dmoney1980]

It's a shame that the 5820 has its PCI-E lane count neutered.

By how much?

 

[cbn]

If PCI-E lanes are being reduced on i7-5820K (40 vs 28?), then I think Intel should release a lower cost X99 class chipset to go along with that.

Bring Haswell-E more into the mainstream. (And boost clocks on Broadwell i5-K to 4+ GHz just like on the i7-4790K so we can finally get rid of the whole Z board thing on LGA 1150 type sockets going forward for all practical purposes)

 

[jhu]

Are the Xeon versions coming out at the same time as the enthusiast versions?

 

[Grooveriding]

 

[LagunaX]

It's a shame that the 5820 has its PCI-E lane count neutered.

 

[ElFenix]

i still hate intel's "last gen parts with current gen numbers" thing.

 

[Blue_Max]

Nice price for the 5820k! Pity about that awful 140W of power... will it really guzzle that much as a rule?

 

[DigDog]

5820k still makes sense for most users; you won't saturate that much PCIE anyway, no need to spend 50% more for the same chip except bandwidth your hardware will never use.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Nice price for the 5820k! Pity about that awful 140W of power... will it really guzzle that much as a rule?

Its a family TDP, not the chip. Whatever TDP the 999$ chip will have, so will the other 2, nomatter their power consumption.

 

[ShintaiDK]

i still hate intel's "last gen parts with current gen numbers" thing.

Yep. Its a bad introduction from GPU makers. Old wine on new bottles.

 

[Idontcare]

Nice price for the 5820k! Pity about that awful 140W of power... will it really guzzle that much as a rule?

Not likely, unless you OC

 

[Blue_Max]

...sounds like I should hold off on the upgrade I'm itching for. Lots of cool new stuff right on the horizon! New video cards coming too!

 

[jihe]

$420 for 6 cores seems pretty reasonable. Pity about the platform cost though. These are DDR4 only right?

 

[ShintaiDK]

$420 for 6 cores seems pretty reasonable. Pity about the platform cost though. These are DDR4 only right?

Right.

But it doesnt seem bad. DDR4 is currently 20% over DDR3 on geishalz. And close to same price for same speed.

 

[frozentundra123456]

Not likely, unless you OC

Well regular haswell is 84 watts so 1.5 x that is 125 watts, so 140 watts seems reasonable.

 

[Enigmoid]

Well regular haswell is 84 watts so 1.5 x that is 125 watts, so 140 watts seems reasonable.

No igp.

 

[exar333]

What I am most interested in is to see OC'd power consumption on these Haswell CPUs. My SB-E used a LOT of power (+200w or so) at 4.7ghz vs. stock. Hoping this will maybe trim that a bit on the 6C parts, and (if they OC to similar levels) maybe keep a similar power usage profile on 8C.

REALLY want to see how these OC plus if they will be releasing a TSX-fixed stepping 4Q/1Q 2015...if so, I might wait for that.

 

[RussianSensation]

Nice, 5820K at $412, or just $70 over 4790K. Add $50 more for the mobo, $100 more for RAM and you are paying a reasonable $220 for 50% more cores. Not bad at all considering i7 4790K charges $100 for more or less HT. If 5820K can hit 4.5-4.6 Ghz in air, this could form a very solid system for the next 4-5 years. Next year it will get even more interesting once DDR4 prices drop and BW-E comes with even lower power usage. Intel really needs to have high end Skylake-K ready next year unless their plan is to push enthusiasts away from Z97 towards the X99 platform. If the 6- and 8-core parts can comes close to 4790K's 4.7-4.8Gh, then the small reduction in clock speeds could be well worth the trade off for gamers + power users. Can't wait to see OCing results!!!

 

[StrangerGuy]

Nice, 5820K at $412, or just $70 over 4790K. Add $50 more for the mobo, $100 more for RAM and you are paying a reasonable $220 for 50% more cores. Not bad at all considering i7 4790K charges $100 for more or less HT. If 5820K can hit 4.5-4.6 Ghz in air, this could form a very solid system for the next 4-5 years. Next year it will get even more interesting once DDR4 prices drop and BW-E comes with even lower power usage. Intel really needs to have high end Skylake-K ready next year unless their plan is to push enthusiasts away from Z97 towards the X99 platform. If the 6- and 8-core parts can comes close to 4790K's 4.7-4.8Gh, then the small reduction in clock speeds could be well worth the trade off for gamers + power users. Can't wait to see OCing results!!!

Like the 4790K before, signs of Intel is getting *it* when it comes to pricing their $300+ CPUs. Not the complete "meeeeeeeh" SB/IB-E was.

 

[CakeMonster]

I guess we'll see to what extent HW-E 6 cores really give us anything significant over ever improving HT and better IPC on 4 core BW/SK-K.

 

[AdamK47]

i still hate intel's "last gen parts with current gen numbers" thing.

They could stick any number on the name or call it anything. It's really irrelevant. All I care about is the "last gen parts performing better than the current gen" thing.

 

[WhoBeDaPlaya]

Like the 4790K before, signs of Intel is getting *it* when it comes to pricing their $300+ CPUs. Not the complete "meeeeeeeh" SB/IB-E was.

Intel got it when they priced the i7 920. The motherboards weren't terribly expensive either (got my EX58-UD3Rs for < $150 a piece).

 

[Blue_Max]

With DDR3 prices so annoyingly high, might as well go DDR4 anyway... of course, I can't find any yet. Only one month away??