Am I misreading this roundable Mediamatters article or is her husband a principle in the company that lobbies for BoA to prevent financial reform or at least does some kind of PR?
Your tactics are kind of clever. You're A) making it sound like he's just an employee of a giant corporation rather than a principle listed 2nd on their website, B) making it sound like BoA is just another client, and C) making it sound like lobbying or PR for BoA is somehow equivalent to having a BoA account.
Rational 360 Principal Bios
Let's see how far you can stretch the connections. The FORTUNE columnist (!must be BIG BUSINESS!), and sometime FOX Business News analyst, that lives next to the B of A attorney whose home got mobbed by SEIU/ACORN and frightened a 14 year old into seeking refuge in a closet is married to a corporate/political communications professional who has as clients politicians and corporations (!BIG BUSINESS, AGAIN!)
The concern you have is that she did not mention that her husband is a principal in a media communications company that has among hundred of clients a CEO speakers organization, The Business Round Table, that has as one of their hundreds of members, the chairman of B of A. B of A is not a client at all, but the chairman is a member of a speakers group that the husband does PR for. And therefore, her own messaging on the mob in her neighborhood is skewed to not fairly represent the goodness of the mob actions. Do I have that right?
Her husband is not a lobbyist, he is a media guy, a PR flack that specializes in Republican campaigns, like for Mitt Romney (former Chairman of Bain & Co. - !BIG BUSINESS, OMG!) His partners include guys that worked in the same capacity for Clinton. Hello! Real world! These consultants in media work for whomever pays their bills!
I know this is kind of complicated for you and Media Matters (though they are funded by George Soros, one of the biggest money grubbers of all time that got his money by buying inside information from lefty governments) to understand, but people work for companies. Sometimes, like in law firms and professional services companies where the people are both producers of billable hours and are either founding members or invited partners they are also part owners, also sometimes known as principals. You seem to have a big problem with that, like it makes a difference and requires special disclaimers for their spouses, who do not work at the same firms and actually have their own professional lives.
I get it! You don't have a wife that works! If you did, you would find that what you do for a living has virtually nothing to do with what she does for a living, unless you are both principals at the same firm, of course, and have !BIG BUSINESS! as clients. Or if a mob descends on your neighborhood to terrorize the local kids.
And, for all I know, both the husband and the wife have B of A checking accounts, which automatically would disqualify them, according to your standard, from reacting to the SEIU mob at their doors and the doors of the B of A attorney that lives in their neighborhood.
If I were you, I wouldn't worry about an SEIU mob assaulting your room in your mom's basement. I am sure you have nothing to do with !BIG BUSINESS! other than eating their tasty chicken.