Have You Gotten Your Covid Vaccine? Thread.

Page 72 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

repoman0

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2010
4,689
3,700
136
I guess I'll be the outlier here and instead of caring about you and trying to keep you safe like the dozen of posters here have been doing, I say don't get vaccinated.

In fact, I suggest you and your whole family not get vaccinated. The country will be better off if people like you exist in smaller and smaller numbers. Just think about it, less people means less resources being used like medical, food, energy, etc, more housing will be available and there will be less traffic too! Your sacrifice will be for the greater good!

You don't seem like the type to believe in evolution but a mass Darwinism event can really help humans evolve into something better. So not only will you be helping your country be great again, you'll be helping the human race.

Sure if people acted like you we'd probably get more verients and could end up with something even nastier but the smart people will continue practicing safe behavior and getting vaccinations while people like you shrink in numbers. Its a sacrifice I'm willing to make even if it means losing a family member or two. After all, I can't want something for someone more than they do and its clear their life or their families life isn't that important.

So do yourself a favor, stop trying to find cherry picked examples of why getting vaccinated is bad, stop pretending to care about the science, stop wasting your time trying to justify your position to strangers on the internet. Instead, go out to where there are lots of people and don't worry about covid, those that were worried about it did what it took to take care of themselves, so you'll have no need to feel sorry about harming people because those who do get sick are just like you and those who don't, well they aren't like you.

Thank you for your sacrifice!

Not sure if sarcastic but I actually wholeheartedly agree
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
70,144
28,775
136
This shot was not test, pushed out really really fast without any real test done over years of time, so I am not just going to believe the "science" and because billions have taken it and not kicked the bucket yet, or have serious heath problems now because "science" did not have enough time, its in a "emergency (mass trials)" state right now, and do not have the usual:
Side effects may include....
Rectal bleeding
Brain Cancer
Lung Cancer
More severe case of cancer
Loss of motor skills
May forget who you are for weeks at a time
other serious side effect may also occur
Seeing double
Do not drive a car or heavy machinery
loss of awareness
loss of balance
Extreme Gas
Shitting yourself
Stuttering
Going cold turkey off the drug may be worse then going cold off Heroine for over a month of hell (I know this one personally coming off Paxil)
This is fun and you're a funboy so…

Let's take the cancers for starters. The vaccine has been out for eight months or so and you're claiming side effects of cancers. So let's see your evidence of that because AFAIK the only thing that can cause acute cancers is high doses of ionizing radiation. Every other cancer cause (other than congenital) takes years to manifest.

Amnesia? Really? Stop watching soap operas. The only people get amnesia are on soap operas.

Going cold turkey off a vaccine? Literally everybody taking any vaccine goes cold turkey off the vaccine.

In short,
QUIT FUCKING FLAILING AND USE YOUR GOD DAMN BRAIN!
IT'S THERE FOR A REASON, USE IT.
 

VW MAN

Senior member
Jun 27, 2020
677
861
96
After reading all the garbage mixed in on @funboy6942 posts all I got to say is the more people like him who die off due to covid, the better off the rest of us will be. The time to coddle and attempt to educate the idiotsticks is over. The only sad part is people like @funboy6942 will likely spread their disease before they die a sad and preventable death, but for the most part I dont have any fucks to give to him or his ilk. Go ahead and die, you'll be doing the planet a favor!

Any one sentence, may be ok. Collectively, though, several utterances above are far too much on the "wishing death" on another poster side of things, no matter how frustrated you may be with their . . . contributions . . . to the topic.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
After reading all the garbage mixed in on @funboy6942 posts all I got to say is the more people like him who die off due to covid, the better off the rest of us will be. The time to coddle and attempt to educate the idiotsticks is over. The only sad part is people like @funboy6942 will likely spread their disease before they die a sad and preventable death, but for the most part I dont have any fucks to give to him or his ilk. Go ahead and die, you'll be doing the planet a favor!

Frustrating yes, but it's not for the best of everyone. Infected people are reservoirs for the virus. We have to limit (ideally eliminate-> eradicate) them to stop/slow the virus spread and it's evolution towards new variants.

Delta will not be the last. The longer it sits in the population at a high level means it's a danger to everyone.
 

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
6,551
3,024
136
Can anyone post up the breakthrough data for Tenn. for funboy? I had no luck finding it yesterday.

I'm in WV and they just started posting the data this week. It's proof that you are way better off with the vaccine than without.

WV breakthrough data as of 8/28/2021:

 
Reactions: Ken g6

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,481
8,341
126
There's *A LOT* to unpack on break through cases.

1) Raw numbers still track equal to or better than what vaccine efficacy was tested at (90%-95% prevention of infection). WV is under 5%
2) Age group is *VERY* important. 60 of 74 breakthrough deaths were in the 71+ age range.
3) That age group is already vulnerable due to a lowered immune response due to age. They are more vulnerable due to overall underlying health.
4) That age group was one of the first along with health care workers to get the vaccine. We are finding that efficacy wanes after 8 months. Many of these 71+ were the first people in many states and that 8 month mark is starting to creep up. Combine it with item 3) above and it's why we are pushing for boosters now.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,920
36,999
136
There's *A LOT* to unpack on break through cases.

1) Raw numbers still track equal to or better than what vaccine efficacy was tested at (90%-95% prevention of infection). WV is under 5%
2) Age group is *VERY* important. 60 of 74 breakthrough deaths were in the 71+ age range.
3) That age group is already vulnerable due to a lowered immune response due to age. They are more vulnerable due to overall underlying health.
4) That age group was one of the first along with health care workers to get the vaccine. We are finding that efficacy wanes after 8 months. Many of these 71+ were the first people in many states and that 8 month mark is starting to creep up. Combine it with item 3) above and it's why we are pushing for boosters now.

The FDA is getting cranky that the administration is ahead of them on boosters. Normally I'd agree but we've got live data from the UK and Israel to rely on that increasingly looks pretty sufficient to boost the over 60s at a minimum by the 8 month mark. Relatedly the FDA appears basically content to let all the kids in the US just get COVID rather than EUA for the 5-11s like yesterday. Better to be infected than the slim slim slim chance of there being a problem that would blow back on them I guess.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,202
16,658
136
The FDA is getting cranky that the administration is ahead of them on boosters. Normally I'd agree but we've got live data from the UK and Israel to rely on that increasingly looks pretty sufficient to boost the over 60s at a minimum by the 8 month mark. Relatedly the FDA appears basically content to let all the kids in the US just get COVID rather than EUA for the 5-11s like yesterday. Better to be infected than the slim slim slim chance of there being a problem that would blow back on them I guess.

I have though the same thing and obviously there would be dire consequences for everyone even those without kids if something went wrong. As another poster said we are living in the Golden Age of dummies...
I also think and I certainly am not an expert why not allow Doctors to prescribe it. That way a non approved vaccination can be given to those who want it for their kids and it also cannot be required because the it could easily be said the Doctor won’t prescribe it, this gives everyone an out and allows those willing to take the risk.
 

VW MAN

Senior member
Jun 27, 2020
677
861
96
Frustrating yes, but it's not for the best of everyone. Infected people are reservoirs for the virus. We have to limit (ideally eliminate-> eradicate) them to stop/slow the virus spread and it's evolution towards new variants.

Delta will not be the last. The longer it sits in the population at a high level means it's a danger to everyone.
Totally understand, but nothing short of hogtieing the dumbassess and forcing the vaccination into their arms will get the morons to actually take this all seriously and do the right things. So we either forcibly vaccinate the unwilling or the rest of us will be forced to continue to do all the right things and hope for the best, and when new mitigation efforts (vaccines etc) are needed for future variants we do what we can to protect ourselves from them...as for the rest 'em...fuck 'em!
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,920
36,999
136
I have though the same thing and obviously there would be dire consequences for everyone even those without kids if something went wrong. As another poster said we are living in the Golden Age of dummies...
I also think and I certainly am not an expert why not allow Doctors to prescribe it. That way a non approved vaccination can be given to those who want it for their kids and it also cannot be required because the it could easily be said the Doctor won’t prescribe it, this gives everyone an out and allows those willing to take the risk.

I believe the FDA said not to provide the Pfizer vaccine off label to under 12, which I I don't think is legally binding but will probably be enough to dissuade most doctors from doing it. I do think that given what we know parents who want to have their 5-11s vaccinated with 10mcg of Pfizer/BNT should have an avenue to do so at this point.
 
Reactions: Fanatical Meat
Feb 4, 2009
35,202
16,658
136
Totally understand, but nothing short of hogtieing the dumbassess and forcing the vaccination into their arms will get the morons to actually take this all seriously and do the right things. So we either forcibly vaccinate the unwilling or the rest of us will be forced to continue to do all the right things and hope for the best, and when new mitigation efforts (vaccines etc) are needed for future variants we do what we can to protect ourselves from them...as for the rest 'em...fuck 'em!

This is what would happen with forcing them and yes they’d still take their toy.


There would be naked, greased up MAGA assholes everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Bitek

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
6,551
3,024
136
There's *A LOT* to unpack on break through cases.

1) Raw numbers still track equal to or better than what vaccine efficacy was tested at (90%-95% prevention of infection). WV is under 5%
2) Age group is *VERY* important. 60 of 74 breakthrough deaths were in the 71+ age range.
3) That age group is already vulnerable due to a lowered immune response due to age. They are more vulnerable due to overall underlying health.
4) That age group was one of the first along with health care workers to get the vaccine. We are finding that efficacy wanes after 8 months. Many of these 71+ were the first people in many states and that 8 month mark is starting to creep up. Combine it with item 3) above and it's why we are pushing for boosters now.
Thanks for points 3 and 4. In my mind I only considered preexisting conditions as a contributing factor of death.

What is the deal with the boosters? Our governor keeps complaining that he's waiting on the feds for the boosters. He wants to get the older folks the booster asap.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,202
16,658
136
Thanks for points 3 and 4. In my mind I only considered preexisting conditions as a contributing factor of death.

What is the deal with the boosters? Our governor keeps complaining that he's waiting on the feds for the boosters. He wants to get the older folks the booster asap.

Not sure, Massachusetts seems to have them. Two older folks from Church mentioned they received their boosters.
I am assuming a booster is the same as the first or second dose.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: balloonshark
Mar 11, 2004
23,250
5,694
146
His obvious lack of logical deductive reasoning is fairly evident in this thread. Dullard laid it out pretty effen well. Props to him.

Sucks for his kids though...

He doesn't have kids? Wait, you were talking about funboy and not RedSquirrel? I was talking about the latter.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,918
9,182
136
Thanks for points 3 and 4. In my mind I only considered preexisting conditions as a contributing factor of death.

What is the deal with the boosters? Our governor keeps complaining that he's waiting on the feds for the boosters. He wants to get the older folks the booster asap.

Boosters plan isn't fully embraced by all in the Biden Administration yet. Besides not even having enough inter-agency reviewed data took confirm that boosters are needed, I bet there are a few folks who wonder why we're diverting doses for boosters when too many still don't have a first dose yet.

Nevermind the fact that we've already let 15M doses go to waste and the rest of the world is still struggling to get enough effective vax to distribute.

 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,476
3,976
126
What is the deal with the boosters? Our governor keeps complaining that he's waiting on the feds for the boosters. He wants to get the older folks the booster asap.
I think the deal comes down to timing. Kids 5 to 12 will be allowed shots soon. Delta is increasing demand for vaccines again. Boosters are being rolled out to those who need it (immunocompromised and similar). Vaccines are finally getting rolled out in resource poor locations. Ultimately having a big surge in boosters right now could create another vaccine shortage, albeit temporary. Boosters in late fall/early winter won't have that issue. Plus, we'll have a lot more data on the subject especially when it comes to mixing and matching vaccines.

A third vaccine booster for otherwise healthy people so soon (before the antibodies have fully worn off) will have very little impact on the disease. But getting that vaccine into those who are unvaccinated would have a massive impact. Thus the priority is still on getting it into those who are unvaccinated.

That said, I have penciled in on my calendar a booster shot for mid-November.
 
Reactions: balloonshark

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,920
36,999
136
I think the deal comes down to timing. Kids 5 to 12 will be allowed shots soon. Delta is increasing demand for vaccines again. Boosters are being rolled out to those who need it (immunocompromised and similar). Vaccines are finally getting rolled out in resource poor locations. Ultimately having a big surge in boosters right now could create another vaccine shortage, albeit temporary. Boosters in late fall/early winter won't have that issue. Plus, we'll have a lot more data on the subject especially when it comes to mixing and matching vaccines.

A third vaccine booster for otherwise healthy people so soon (before the antibodies have fully worn off) will have very little impact on the disease. But getting that vaccine into those who are unvaccinated would have a massive impact. Thus the priority is still on getting it into those who are unvaccinated.

That said, I have penciled in on my calendar a booster shot for mid-November.

I've talked to three people who've already gotten boosted. It's happening.

With 50M doses sitting on shelves and the efficacy pretty clearly increased by the 3rd dose against symptomatic Delta infection I'm hard pressed to judge anybody. Especially in states with ridiculous transmission levels.
 

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
8,938
8,144
136
From what I've seen it appears to be about 90 days (or at least that's the amount of time they recommend you wait before getting vaccinated after contracting COVID). And of course limit exposure (mask up, avoid groups of people especially indoors) and not act like there's no risk.
My daughter had COVID, and was told to wait 45 days by her MD.
 

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
8,938
8,144
136
I'll ask a third time. How do you know this scenario you point out is not actually those who caught Covid? How do you know that if you stay mostly at home and a family member brings in Covid, that in 10 years Covid will not cause you to fall like a fly?
  • HIV usually turns into AIDS about 10 years later.
  • Chickenpox lies dormant in your body for decades and can become shingles.
  • HPV sometimes helps your body get cancer.
  • Why are people confident that nothing similar happens with Covid?
First off, none of those diseases kill you within days or weeks of contracting the disease, COVID does, and with a vengeance.

Maybe those of us that grew up when polio vaccines were being given have some mysterious side effect of that vaccine. But we lived long enough for that to occur, and weren't placed in an iron lung to even breath, or have a leg 4" shorter than the other, as my FIL did due to Polio, which wrecked his back and caused him a lifetime of pain. Nor do we have to put on leg braces to simply get out of bed. Those who contracted polio are also experiencing the effect of the disease that appear decades after the original infection.

All these people that whine about the "long term effects" of the vaccine fail to ever consider the "long term effects" of a COVID infection. Nothing to do with medical science, but their myopic political agenda.
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,671
580
126
I think the deal comes down to timing. Kids 5 to 12 will be allowed shots soon. Delta is increasing demand for vaccines again. Boosters are being rolled out to those who need it (immunocompromised and similar). Vaccines are finally getting rolled out in resource poor locations. Ultimately having a big surge in boosters right now could create another vaccine shortage, albeit temporary. Boosters in late fall/early winter won't have that issue. Plus, we'll have a lot more data on the subject especially when it comes to mixing and matching vaccines.

A third vaccine booster for otherwise healthy people so soon (before the antibodies have fully worn off) will have very little impact on the disease. But getting that vaccine into those who are unvaccinated would have a massive impact. Thus the priority is still on getting it into those who are unvaccinated.

That said, I have penciled in on my calendar a booster shot for mid-November.

Yeah, the World Health Organization is really pressing on 1st world countries to *not* give booster shots, and focus instead on helping get the rest of the world shots in the arm. In a way, I agree, getting more people overall vaccinated on the planet will do more good to slow the spread of the disease and minimize the chance of newer vaccine resistant variants being introduced in populations with low vaccination rates. As shouldn't be surprising, many 1st world countries are going "nah dog".

 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,920
36,999
136
Ultimately people have the freedom to make a choice, regardless if that choice will kill them.

Do they have the right to essentially unlimited extraordinary medical care at the expense of people with better odds of survival from correctable problems?

All the disbelievers probably should not be going to the hospital if they really want us to take them seriously.
 
Reactions: Meghan54 and desy

linkgoron

Platinum Member
Mar 9, 2005
2,395
969
136
A third vaccine booster for otherwise healthy people so soon (before the antibodies have fully worn off) will have very little impact on the disease. But getting that vaccine into those who are unvaccinated would have a massive impact. Thus the priority is still on getting it into those who are unvaccinated.

I agree that getting unvaccinated people get vaccinated should be priority one, however I will say that it appears as though the booster shot is having a noticeable effect in Israel. In Israel the booster shots (after five months) seem to have been very effective in reducing delta infections, in all ages, and as a consequence reducing severe cases. Note that this is mostly through cursory observation of the numbers which have really gone down for vaccinated people, but I've also seen some research numbers floating around.

These are the normalized new infections for under 60 - blue is unvaccinated, orange is partial, and green is 2 or more shots. 50+ were allowed to get their 3rd shot on August 15th, 40+ on August 19th, 30+ on August 24th, and everybody else a few days ago. Now, it might be a behavioral effect, but at least to me it appears that the 3rd shot is effective (For how long? Hopefully longer than five-eight months, I guess).



Here are the 60+ new infections (They were allowed a 3rd shot since August 1st)


Under 60 active normalized severe cases


60+ normalized active severe cases
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |