HBO's Game of Thrones season 6 discussion thread- airing 4/24/16 (No book spoilers)

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TiredEngineer

Member
Jul 26, 2013
98
0
66
I don't think we can discuss that here, this thread doesn't allow spoilers, educated guesses don't seem to be allowed either. I don't blame any member specifically but I am tired of getting baited into revealing more than what the people who have problems digesting GOT can handle.

The only thread where open GOT discussion is allowed:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=38161699#post38161699

I haven't read the books past the first couple chapters of the first book. All I did was copy and paste the vow that Jon said in season 1. The rest is a guess based on the fact that he died and the oath mentions it is fulfilled with his death.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
wtf Tyrion becoming Dragon Whisperer?!
tyrion has never met the dragons b4.
uggg...

now if tyrion brought Missandei with him then that would have been a different story.

so we now have the 3rd dragon rider -> tyrion
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,297
2,001
126
wtf Tyrion becoming Dragon Whisperer?!
tyrion has never met the dragons b4.
uggg...

now if tyrion brought Missandei with him then that would have been a different story.

so we now have the 3rd dragon rider -> tyrion

I think that was meant to show that the dragons are intelligent and not merely lapdogs loyal to a familiar person. They understood what he was doing and might have been able to understand his words as well. That's going to be important.

There's also a reasonably plausible theory that Tyrion is Aerys Targaryen's son and is not related to Tywin at all. If that's true the Targaryen blood would probably give him an affinity for communicating with dragons.
 
Last edited:

Xonim

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2011
1,131
0
0
I think that was meant to show that the dragons are intelligent and not merely lapdogs loyal to a familiar person. They understood what he was doing and might have been able to understand his words as well. That's going to be important.

Plus he wasn't exactly moving in a threatening manner. Most animals can distinguish that, and Tyrion had just gotten done saying how smart dragons supposedly were. They knew what was up.
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,705
117
106
Can someone explain to me the whole religious cult thing? They took power after shitty king came to throne?
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,716
417
126
tbqhwy.com
Can someone explain to me the whole religious cult thing? They took power after shitty king came to throne?

its because cerci allowed them to form an army

its happened in the past shit went bad, so they were banned from having one, cerci reversed that

shits going bad again
 

wetech

Senior member
Jul 16, 2002
871
6
81
Can someone explain to me the whole religious cult thing? They took power after shitty king came to throne?

Pretty much, yes. The lowest of society suffered under Joffrey and turned to religion. Once the High Septon is killed in the riots, a new one is chosen. In this case, the leader of the Sparrows was chosen as the High Septon. He's a bit more fanatical then the last one.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,297
2,001
126
Can someone explain to me the whole religious cult thing? They took power after shitty king came to throne?

Cersei gave them some power and tricked them into doing her dirty work to get rid of Margaery. They got a taste of power, enjoyed it and realized that there is strength in numbers. That got reinforced by Thommen being too weak to do anything about them. So they think they're in charge and will continue to believe that until Cersei/Thommen organize against them.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
That much is a given. They didn't introduce Lyanna via flashback just because they needed to pad out the episode. She is Chekhov's Gun and was only shown now because she's going to be important later on this season. If they were not going to delve into Jon's backstory she would not have been shown at all.

Heh, learned something new today. When I read that I wondered why it wasnt Chekhov's phaser, and couldn't remember when Chekhov having one was important. :biggrin:
 

basslover1

Golden Member
Aug 4, 2004
1,921
0
76
Pretty much, yes. The lowest of society suffered under Joffrey and turned to religion. Once the High Septon is killed in the riots, a new one is chosen. In this case, the leader of the Sparrows was chosen as the High Septon. He's a bit more fanatical then the last one.
There's also the book theory that the high sparrow is an important character we've never had first hand experience with. If true it could make the king's landing plot very interesting.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
I think that was meant to show that the dragons are intelligent and not merely lapdogs loyal to a familiar person. They understood what he was doing and might have been able to understand his words as well. That's going to be important.

There's also a reasonably plausible theory that Tyrion is Aerys Targaryen's son and is not related to Tywin at all. If that's true the Targaryen blood would probably give him an affinity for communicating with dragons.

the show set the up the scene by tyrion asking Missandei if she has ever been harmed by the dragons.
then tyrion says he wants to take the chains off them.

my 1st thought was he sends Missandei.
2nd thought was he goes with Missandei in the hopes that if the dragons see Missandei ok w/tyrion, then they'll be ok w/him.

wtfbbq that he goes w/o her or grey worm, the 2 left in the city that the dragons are familiar with?!
the dragons should have bbq'd his ass the moment he got within flame thrower range.

ugg.. stupid sloppy writing in ep1 getting stupidier in ep2
i cringe at thinking about the writing for ep3

wtf happened to the award winning writers of past seasons?
 
Last edited:

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,297
2,001
126
the show set the up the scene by tyrion asking Missandei if she has ever been harmed by the dragons.
then tyrion says he wants to take the chains off them.

my 1st thought was he sends Missandei.
2nd thought was he goes with Missandei in the hopes that if the dragons see Missandei ok w/tyrion, then they'll be ok w/him.

wtfbbq that he goes w/o her or grey worm, the 2 left in the city that the dragons are familiar with?!
the dragons should have bbq'd his ass the moment he got within flame thrower range

Are you intentionally being dense or truly that incapable of understanding? If Missandei went it doesn't say anything about the dragons as they knew her. By Tyrion going it shows they're more intelligent than believed and are capable of reasoning. Which puts them at least one notch above you. Tyrion talked about them being smart, then he proved it. That's going to be a factor later on. The dragons are now working independently for a time and the show needed to establish they're capable of doing so.
 
Last edited:

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
661
136
He would still be a bastard, no, just like Ramsay and the assumed Ned + random barwhore mistress story that created Jon? Even though Lyanna was of noble/firstmen stock, doesn't it have to be the Lord/King's wife to be a legitimate heir?

But that does make a ton of sense and puts a far greater stake on hiding/protecting/carrying the secret of Jon Snow's lineage. Even as a bastard he would have claim (like Gendry paddling away in his boat), but it would be less than Daenery's claim, wouldn't it (because Jon Snow would not have been granted lineage as Roose did with Ramsay)?

Didn't Stannis already legitimize him so he'd follow him into war? Even if he hadn't, it wouldn't take much for Onion Knight guy to say that he was. I'm not 100% sure how legitimizing someone works but they've set up a couple of ways he could be a Stark in full name without anyone questioning it.

One thing I did really like was they way they set up resurrection in GoT. They had set it up way back on a character that didn't really matter to show it's possible. That was some really good thinking on GRRM. Now Snow coming back isn't pulled out of anyone's ass. I'm really curious on what memories Jon will be without. The way Sansa's luck's been, i'm sure she'll get there in the nick of time only for him to not have a clue who she is.

My other guess is that Ramsey's 'gift' will be (Possible book spoiler as I call out a character that only mattered in the books. I do not really know the story that happened in the books, only the basic gist of it. Either way, I'm not trying to spoil anything so tags on the name and why I think it'll happen.. again, haven't read the book so there's no story spoilers in it. I"m not even sure i"ve spelt the name right.)
the Jenye Poole girl I've heard about. I barely understand the story as i haven't read the books, but as I feel they're padding for time I think some of those stories that aren't in the show might trickle in.
I'll remove this is it's too far over the line of show vs book spoiler stuff..
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
The Balon scene was pretty random. I agree that the political struggle for who will replace him as King of the Iron Isles is about as interesting as the Dorne storyline - which is to say not interesting at all. My big fear with the show passing the books is we're going to get more of these useless side plots that fill up time but don't push the story forward.

Roose should have chopped off Ramsay's head the moment the maester said it's a boy. With all the family on family murder last night, I made sure my kids were asleep before checking out for the night.

Random as fuck, but it's basically catching up the rest of the "old people leading a house die/get killed so the next generation can take over" theme. I'm pretty sure his brother won't actually take the house, Balon's daughter will. I think he was brought in solely to kill Balon so she didn't have blood on her hands.

I expect Dorne and Iron Isles will be important in the end game, not just fluff. They just seem like fluff because we don't know how they play into things... I hope.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
Didn't Stannis already legitimize him so he'd follow him into war? Even if he hadn't, it wouldn't take much for Onion Knight guy to say that he was. I'm not 100% sure how legitimizing someone works but they've set up a couple of ways he could be a Stark in full name without anyone questioning it.

I recall Jon refusing Stannis' offer at least twice, because it would have meant reneging on his vow, and Jon is all about that vow.

As for resurrections, it's not just the one unimportant dude:

Kal Drogo was resurrected, but into a catatonic state. It was shown in the first season that it was possible, but the process could be poisoned if either the sorcerer/ess wanted it so, or perhaps depending on the method/type of magic/type, or of person being brought back.

Also, with the Mountain: another person brought back from the dead in an essentially crude but functional manner. The knowledge to do it seems to have long existed in that world and is accessible by those who seek it out, but caution: results may vary.

An interesting issue that bringing Jon back brings--though we don't yet know what kind of state he will be in--which god is the true god? Is the LoL for real? It does seem that in the one case we now know for sure, those resurrections are fully legit and seem to require very minimal knowledge (that one dude was not a priest and never understood the words, but always able to bring his pal back in mostly the same state--and now Firecrotch seemed to be putting her best guess forward and it happened pretty quickly).

If Jon comes back as Jon 2.0: just like Jon Snow but with Kung-Fu grip, then I guess we know that the LoL is the real shit compared to the other gods; accepting maybe that many-faced fellow.
 
Last edited:

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
He would still be a bastard, no, just like Ramsay and the assumed Ned + random barwhore mistress story that created Jon? Even though Lyanna was of noble/firstmen stock, doesn't it have to be the Lord/King's wife to be a legitimate heir?

But that does make a ton of sense and puts a far greater stake on hiding/protecting/carrying the secret of Jon Snow's lineage. Even as a bastard he would have claim (like Gendry paddling away in his boat), but it would be less than Daenery's claim, wouldn't it (because Jon Snow would not have been granted lineage as Roose did with Ramsay)?

You're assuming Rhaegar and Lyanna weren't married in secret. It's possible he didn't kidnap her they fled in love with each other... As far as legitimate heir, if you can't go down in the family tree you go left/right and look for the eldest male. That could be Jon. If they weren't married, a bastard still has a weak claim as the oldest (and only) male of the family.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
661
136
I recall Jon refusing Stannis' offer at least twice, because it would have meant reneging on his vow, and Jon is all about that vow.

I remember him refusing to go as well.. but I wasn't sure if he still legitimized him. Even if he hadn't it wouldn't take much for Sir Onion guy to say he was. Again, I"m not sure how it all works. Ramsey had a scroll on it, but I'm not sure if that was just his way of writing it down.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
Random as fuck, but it's basically catching up the rest of the "old people leading a house die/get killed so the next generation can take over" theme. I'm pretty sure his brother won't actually take the house, Balon's daughter will. I think he was brought in solely to kill Balon so she didn't have blood on her hands.

I expect Dorne and Iron Isles will be important in the end game, not just fluff. They just seem like fluff because we don't know how they play into things... I hope.

It looks like Balon's daughter has to face some sort of trial to win her place, according to that other long hair...reminds of the storyline in Witcher 3. I'm guessing that the brother will somehow make himself known and muck up things int eh process?

I currently see Dorne as fluff simply because it has been handled so poorly. Writing bad, acting bad, choreography bad, characters--outside of Oberyn--bad. I'd just rather not see any of it at this point and feel that if it suddenly disappeared for no reason whatsoever going forward, nothing would be missed and no one would complain.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
I recall Jon refusing Stannis' offer at least twice, because it would have meant reneging on his vow, and Jon is all about that vow.
I remember him refusing to go as well.. but I wasn't sure if he still legitimized him. Even if he hadn't it wouldn't take much for Sir Onion guy to say he was. Again, I"m not sure how it all works. Ramsey had a scroll on it, but I'm not sure if that was just his way of writing it down.

No one really recognized Stannis as the king, only the king can legitimize a bastard. They brought this up in the first episode.

As for resurrections, it's not just the one unimportant dude:

Kal Drogo was resurrected, but into a catatonic state. It was shown in the first season that it was possible, but the process could be poisoned if either the sorcerer/ess wanted it so, or perhaps depending on the method/type of magic/type, or of person being brought back.

Also, with the Mountain: another person brought back from the dead in an essentially crude but functional manner. The knowledge to do it seems to have long existed in that world and is accessible by those who seek it out, but caution: results may vary.

An interesting issue that bringing Jon back brings--though we don't yet know what kind of state he will be in--which god is the true god? Is the LoL for real? It does seem that in the one case we now know for sure, those resurrections are fully legit and seem to require very minimal knowledge (that one dude was not a priest and never understood the words, but always able to bring his pal back in mostly the same state--and now Firecrotch seemed to be putting her best guess forward and it happened pretty quickly).

If Jon comes back as Jon 2.0: just like Jon Snow but with Kung-Fu grip, then I guess we know that the LoL is the real shit compared to the other gods; accepting maybe that many-faced fellow.

Here's my take on it. How/why they resurrect someone matters. The witch wanted to poison the ceremony for revenge, so Drogo came out catatonic.

Qyburn isn't using magic (or very little) and doesn't have a full grasp of how to do it, however he does know how to make them stronger.

Thoros is closest to having it right. He believes in his god, who apparently has the power, and truly wants to bring back Beric. He does it really good, but not quite perfect as Baric said he lost a little bit of himself each time.

Melissandre obviously has more power than Thoros, but she didn't know she could resurrect the dead, until now. She has faith and power. I bet Jon comes back very close to his original self. Maybe a touch better, maybe a touch less.

edit: fixed name
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
Not only that, but no one really recognized Stannis as the king, only the king can legitimize a bastard.



Here's my take on it. How/why they resurrect someone matters. The witch wanted to poison the ceremony for revenge, so Drogo came out catatonic.

Pycelle isn't using magic (or very little) and doesn't have a full grasp of how to do it, however he does know how to make them stronger.

Thoros is closest to having it right. He believes in his god, who apparently has the power, and truly wants to bring back Beric. He does it really good, but not quite perfect as Baric said he lost a little bit of himself each time.

Melissandre obviously has more power than Thoros, but she didn't know she could resurrect the dead, until now. She has faith and power. I bet Jon comes back very close to his original self. Maybe a touch better, maybe a touch less.

Well, she cut off his sexy perm, so he's already a bit diminished.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |