For the unfamiliar, when Manufactuers market their Hard Drives, they're rounding down the size of a kilobyte to 1000bytes (instead of the proper 1024bytes). So when they advertise, for instance, a 200gb Hard Drive...It's actually 200gb based on if a kilobyte were 1000bytes!...Which it's NOT, the proper size is 1024bytes equals a kilobyte. And the difference eqates to ~7% less of the rated capacity once it's formatted. So that 200gb drive only actually gives you 186gb formatted!
Back when the mainstream size of hard drives were in the hundreds of megabytes, this little "gimmick" of using 1000bytes was tolerated...Losing tens of megabytes didn't "hurt" all that much.
But now that we're into the hundreds of GIGABYTES, why are we (as consumers) still tolerating the practice of Manufacturers using 1000bytes???
I was all excited about my recently receiving my 300gb HD that I got a great deal on...Until I formatted the thing!...279gb formatted!!! A loss of 21gb!!!
HD capacity is growing by leaps and bounds and the prices for it are shrinking just as rapidly...So I guess it's just something everyone is going to continue to let slide.
Sorry for ranting, it just upsets me to see something as glaringly misleading as this be tolerated.
Back when the mainstream size of hard drives were in the hundreds of megabytes, this little "gimmick" of using 1000bytes was tolerated...Losing tens of megabytes didn't "hurt" all that much.
But now that we're into the hundreds of GIGABYTES, why are we (as consumers) still tolerating the practice of Manufacturers using 1000bytes???
I was all excited about my recently receiving my 300gb HD that I got a great deal on...Until I formatted the thing!...279gb formatted!!! A loss of 21gb!!!
HD capacity is growing by leaps and bounds and the prices for it are shrinking just as rapidly...So I guess it's just something everyone is going to continue to let slide.
Sorry for ranting, it just upsets me to see something as glaringly misleading as this be tolerated.