Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Movies: yes. 360K pixel resoultion for current DVD vs. 2,025K pixels for 1080i HD.
TV shows: if they were not recorded in HD video I don't think they have any more resolution than DVD, unless they were shot on film instead of video
Originally posted by: Bobthelost
I wouldn't wait with baited breath, the price is going to be horrific.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Either buy a player (Samsung) that read (and writes) BOTH formats or wait until one format kills the other. Not until then will there be wide adoption anyway.
Otherwies, you might just be throwing money away. I mean, how long did SA-CDs last?
Originally posted by: Bobthelost
Horrific, then there's the price of the discs as well.
Originally posted by: McPudd
I've read elsewhwere that not only do you need a new BluRay or new HD DVD player to play these movie discs,
you are also going to have to buy a new monitor/HD TV with on-board copy protecion hardware that will allow playback in
HD.
Ditto for playing these discs in HD via MS Vista.
Something about hand-shaking that needs to occur between hardware in the player and hardware in the monitor/HD TV
to OK HD playback. If not, playback reverts to normal DVD movie play.
Monitors/HD TVs with this hardware do not yet exist.
Sure hope this isn't the case ...
Yep. This should go nicely with the new release of 1080p plasmas. NICE!Originally posted by: GimpyFuzznut
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Movies: yes. 360K pixel resoultion for current DVD vs. 2,025K pixels for 1080i HD.
TV shows: if they were not recorded in HD video I don't think they have any more resolution than DVD, unless they were shot on film instead of video
Won't Blu-Ray go up to 1080p?
Yeah, although fortunately the latest generation GPUs do H.265 and WMV acceleration.Originally posted by: LooneyWell, if you've ever played a 1080p content on your computer, you would know what kind of horsepower it needs.Originally posted by: Bobthelost
Horrific, then there's the price of the discs as well.
Heh. $500? That's cheap. They were much higher when they debuted.This is really for the early adopters. The first DVD players were like $500 too. In a few years, when it becomes mainstream and Blockbuster are carrying the movies, players will be much cheaper.
Originally posted by: randomlinh
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Either buy a player (Samsung) that read (and writes) BOTH formats or wait until one format kills the other. Not until then will there be wide adoption anyway.
Otherwies, you might just be throwing money away. I mean, how long did SA-CDs last?
did they even get off the ground?
Originally posted by: Eug
Yeah, although fortunately the latest generation GPUs do H.265 and WMV acceleration.Originally posted by: LooneyWell, if you've ever played a 1080p content on your computer, you would know what kind of horsepower it needs.Originally posted by: Bobthelost
Horrific, then there's the price of the discs as well.
Heh. $500? That's cheap. They were much higher when they debuted.This is really for the early adopters. The first DVD players were like $500 too. In a few years, when it becomes mainstream and Blockbuster are carrying the movies, players will be much cheaper.
Anyways I expect to be getting DVDs for quite some time. Most movies I only watch once anyways, and 480p is good enough for my <40" screen most of the time. I love HD, but I'm not willing to pay the potential 50-100% premium for the discs most of the time.