AzN
Banned
- Nov 26, 2001
- 4,112
- 2
- 0
These seem good with AA but without AA it's about 20% slower than 3850 or 8800gs depending on the game
You can get a nice 9600gso for $65 after $20 rebate which is actually cheaper than 4670.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814121251
If you are a gamer these would be better value and even better since it's stock clocked G92 chip which is 600/1500/900. Overclocking on these would be monstrous as well. Most reviews put up 4670 against a stock 9600gso which is 550/1375/800. Most g92 chips hit 700 core 1700SP and 1000 memory or higher.
I just don't see how a 4670 is that good for value oriented buyers who are trying to squeeze performance out of their $$$? IF 3850, 9600gso, 9600gt or even 3870 wasn't in the picture.. Then maybe these would be a good idea but it's just another underperforming card hidden by the fact that most reviewers add AA which the RV7xx line is good at.
You can get a nice 9600gso for $65 after $20 rebate which is actually cheaper than 4670.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814121251
If you are a gamer these would be better value and even better since it's stock clocked G92 chip which is 600/1500/900. Overclocking on these would be monstrous as well. Most reviews put up 4670 against a stock 9600gso which is 550/1375/800. Most g92 chips hit 700 core 1700SP and 1000 memory or higher.
I just don't see how a 4670 is that good for value oriented buyers who are trying to squeeze performance out of their $$$? IF 3850, 9600gso, 9600gt or even 3870 wasn't in the picture.. Then maybe these would be a good idea but it's just another underperforming card hidden by the fact that most reviewers add AA which the RV7xx line is good at.