- Jan 2, 2006
- 10,455
- 35
- 91
So I'm going to be doing a debate in class about healthcare for illegal immigrants. I'm the affirmative, which means I'm arguing for change of some kind to our current policies. Someone else is doing the negative, which means they are arguing for no change (stay with the status quo). I want some ideas on how to counter the negative and arguments for the affirmative.
Currently the US does not offer health care to illegals. You need a SSN and a picture ID to get health care, so illegals are disqualified. However, it is very easy for illegals to fake an ID and to give out a random SSN. I'm arguing that the US needs to make it harder for illegals to cheat the system, because right now it's too easy.
1. Health care for illegals means they get health care while not giving anything back in the form of taxes. So they are almost a pure cost on the system.
2. There are cases where illegals have actually "cut in line" in front of legal residents for things like organ donations?
3. Any other points you can think of?
Obviously it gets sticky when you throw ethics into the mix. The Hippocratic Oath would be put to the test when denying health care to another human being based on the illegality of his citizenship. To what extent do we deny health care? Do we go to the extreme and even deny emergency care? They are still human beings.
How do I combat these points?
Currently the US does not offer health care to illegals. You need a SSN and a picture ID to get health care, so illegals are disqualified. However, it is very easy for illegals to fake an ID and to give out a random SSN. I'm arguing that the US needs to make it harder for illegals to cheat the system, because right now it's too easy.
1. Health care for illegals means they get health care while not giving anything back in the form of taxes. So they are almost a pure cost on the system.
2. There are cases where illegals have actually "cut in line" in front of legal residents for things like organ donations?
3. Any other points you can think of?
Obviously it gets sticky when you throw ethics into the mix. The Hippocratic Oath would be put to the test when denying health care to another human being based on the illegality of his citizenship. To what extent do we deny health care? Do we go to the extreme and even deny emergency care? They are still human beings.
How do I combat these points?