Help Picking New CPU

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
4820k and LGA 2011 is most definitely NOT best bang for the buck. You basically only want to do that if you are getting the 6 core chips, since z87 is a much better chipset that is also cheaper.

4670k + z87 and call it a day
 

Essence_of_War

Platinum Member
Feb 21, 2013
2,650
4
81
4670k + z87 and call it a day
What Headfoot said. :thumbsup:

I'm now down to the pick of i7-4770k or the i7-4820k and from everything i read if seems like the 4820 is superior in a good number of ways, the only question i have is the connector. Is the LGA 2011 at least equal to or better than the LGA 1150?
...
Is there any real disadvantage to the 2011 connector over the 1150 that anyone knows about?

The 4820 is a quad-core Ivy Bridge-E. The 4770 is a quad-core Haswell.

The principle advantages to Ivy Bridge-E and socket 2011 are:
1) you want a Hexcore (4930, or 4970) and frankly, for any consideration of bang-for-buck, both hexcore options are over priced. The 4820 IS NOT a hexcore.
2) You want more PCI lanes. (only relevant is you're planning on tri-or-quad GPU set-ups). Remember, you're not locked at 16 lanes on haswell, the motherboard chipset supplies lanes also!
3) You want better TIM on the integrated heat spreader than mainstream Ivy Bridge.
4) Quad channel memory. This is minor. You will not see a difference in non-benchmark uses from quad vs. dual-channel.

The disadvantages are:
1) Haswell outperforms Ivy Bridge clock for clock, and with the 4820 you're not getting extra cores to win the multi-thread contests.
2) Socket 2011 MoBos (x79 chipset) cost more, and typically lack modern features. You MIGHT get native USB 3.0. You might get 2x Sata 6 Gb/s ports. By contrast, one can often find the 4670k bundled with a solid motherboard for ~$300 on newegg. The 4820 ALONE costs $300 on amazon/newegg, and the cheapest reputable motherboard I could find is another ~$200. Compare with this i7-4770k bundle for $445 or this i5-4670k bundle for $312. So for less money, I can head-to-head outperform the 4820 with the 4770, and for ~60% of the cost of the 4820, the i5 gives me most of the performance.


If you need VT-d AND HT, I'd recommend, picking up a Xeon 1240/1245 v3. Less expensive, and they use the more modern socket and more modern architecture.

the i5-4670k would be the simple "best deal for the buck" but i does not have HT nor a hand full of other features.
You haven't mentioned what your use case is, so it isn't clear which features you'd be able to take advantage of, and/or are important to you.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
For gaming I'd go with 4770k at this point. Its worth the extra cash for new games like BF4.
 

Harby

Junior Member
Dec 12, 2008
5
0
66
For gaming I'd go with 4770k at this point. Its worth the extra cash for new games like BF4.

Hmm I about to upgrade my ageing i5 750 and I'm really wondering between 4670k and 4770k. There is zero productivity involved, just gaming. In theory 4670k should be more than enough but with new consoles being 8-core I have a feeling new games might be optimized for that many cores.

Keeping in mind I intend to keep the cpu for at least 2 years, I'm really leaning towards 4770k for some degree of possible future-proofing.

Thoughts?
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,840
617
121
My line of thinking was off track. I thought hexcore meant some damn CPU instruction and it didn't dawn on me until I saw what you wrote about it being a 6 core. So an 8 core is an Octcore? LOL
 

icanhascpu2

Senior member
Jun 18, 2009
228
0
0
Go with the AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor.

It's cheap and it's powerful. (CPU of my rig)


I have a 965BE OCed to 3.8Ghz and I can say with educated and researched certainty that you do not know what youre talking about.

Cheap? yes. Powerful? ... Maybe 5 years ago.

Do NOT go with this chip unless you are very poor or just plain daft. There are intel chips even cheaper than the 965 that preform better these days. Not to mention you will save $50~ a year on energy costs alone with the newer Intel lineups.

The FX line is slightly better per core, and you get twice the cores, but this only matters if you have shit that actually uses 8 cores. Thing is, its rare to find that even with my 4 core AMD! The fact of the matter is the most important thing to look for right now is PER-CORE performance, and Intel is winning in that area by a huge margin. Id advise you to pick up a 2500k for $150.
 

nwo

Platinum Member
Jun 21, 2005
2,309
0
71
Hmm I about to upgrade my ageing i5 750 and I'm really wondering between 4670k and 4770k. There is zero productivity involved, just gaming. In theory 4670k should be more than enough but with new consoles being 8-core I have a feeling new games might be optimized for that many cores.

Keeping in mind I intend to keep the cpu for at least 2 years, I'm really leaning towards 4770k for some degree of possible future-proofing.

Thoughts?

My thoughts:

Save $100 and get the 4670k.

By the time most games start being optimized and require more than 4 cores, it will more than likely be time to upgrade your CPU anyway. In which case you would already have $100 in your pocket towards that upgrade.

Remember, 4770k is still a quad core and will not be much more future proof (for gaming) compared to a 4670k.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
To put it simply, new games like BF4, crisis 3 etc, make good use of more than 4 cores. Quad core CPUs with no hyperthreading are just like 2gb GPUs today. They are good enough for right now, but they are already facing limitations, and two years down the road you will be wishing you had more threads/Vram.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |