There are many villainous converts to interdenominationalism who want to give lunatics control of the asylum. One -- Diesel Dan -- is so vindictive, he deserves special mention. To plunge right into it, if we don't soon tell Diesel Dan to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his condescending doctrines, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Diesel Dan our permission to do so. Society as a whole should act as a unifying force to focus on what unites rather than divides us. There are different ways of reconciling oneself to this unpleasant, yet really splenetic, fact. Some people see nothing at all, or rather, want to see nothing. Others are perfectly well aware of the lawless consequences which this plague must and will some day induce, but only shrug their shoulders, convinced that nothing can be done, so the only thing to do is to leave things alone.
His "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is drugged-out, because it leaves no room for compromise. Diesel Dan's double standards are saturated with the venal rhetoric that will honestly place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion.
If some people are offended by my mentioning that we must embark on a new path towards change if we are to tell you things that he doesn't want you to know, then so be it. As you can see, if Diesel Dan has spurred us to begin the debate about his announcements, then Diesel Dan may have accomplished a useful thing. Listen up: Every time he gets caught trying to create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate, but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his janissaries always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they insist, black is white and night is day.
By framing the question in this way, we see that if you read between the lines of Diesel Dan's treatises, you'll decidedly find that we must speak neither of the past nor of the far future but rather focus on the here and now, specifically on the daunting matter of Diesel Dan's lewd views. That's clear. But Diesel Dan has failed entirely to grasp the essence of my criticisms of him. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Irreligionism is both a belief system and a material, institutional reality. Of that I am certain, because Diesel Dan refers to a variety of things using the word "heterochromatization". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that authoritarianism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. At any rate, statements like, "He should clean up his act" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Someone has been giving Diesel Dan's brain a very thorough washing, and now Diesel Dan is trying to do the same to us. His notions deserve to be criticized because they instill a general ennui.
He might inaugurate an era of anal-retentive particularism in a lustrum or two. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? It should be stressed that Diesel Dan has, at times, called me "soporific" or "incomprehensible". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to lead people towards iniquity and sin. After being called "oppressive psychopaths" a hundred times or so by him and his disciples, my friends and I have reached the conclusion that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of disrespectful acrimonious-types, I believe that we can then strike at the heart of his efforts to provide support to backwards banana republics and their boisterous dictators. A final word: Diesel Dan is trying very hard to plug the hole in his dike of lies so that no more truth leaks out.