You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
Is English your first language? Where did I say it wasn't real? I don't know if it is real or not, Trump shouldn't be posting it as fact is what I was saying.man if buckshit doesnt even think that 3 million illegal voter thing is real...
The thing is someone thinks its real and is pissed illegal are trying to steal the country. Someone may even think violence is the correct way to deal in trumps future. presidents who inflame peoples weird paranoia is a new future for the country.
Given that he thinks 4 years ago is ancient history he probably wasn't old enough to.So did you vote in this past general election?
Eh?You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
So your argument is that if evaluation actually shows that Trump did not win and should not have been named President-Elect it should result in civil war?You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
They have convinced themselves that Trump would have formed an army and marched on Washington, with regards to Trump many people have become completely insane. I see it on the right and the left.LOL. Trump said he would see what the results would be. This was Clinton and people like you pushing him to 100% accept whatever the results were on election day.
You didn't want him to ask for recalls if he thought there were any problems with the count. I wonder why that was? Why did you keep asking him to accept whatever the result was? Maybe the left was trying to rig the vote and failed?
Why cant the left accept the results then? Why are they working to imply something bad happen?
Why cant you accept the results of the election? Why are you casting doubt on our democracy?
Cant move on?
Nothing but a bunch of hypocrites.
Is English your first language? Where did I say it wasn't real? I don't know if it is real or not, Trump shouldn't be posting it as fact is what I was saying.
You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out.
And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
You live in darkness not knowing that everything you fear has already happened. Hillary ascended by armed force in your mind long ago and everything that you had of value was taken. What is left is a mindless robotic shell, a palimpsest, an adumbration of the original. I wish I could give you what you fear will be taken because what you puff up to protect is so so very little.You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
I am not in favor of the recounts but if the rules allow them, even though they won't change anything, then they can do whatever recount they want.So you're in favour of the recount then?
I specifically said "steal the election", not merely Hillary winning.It is frankly horrifying that you seem to be implying that if Clinton was found to win by a recount that this would somehow be 'stealing the election'. It would be the correct person winning, as the point of recounts is to make a more careful and accurate counting of votes. If you were to come out against that then you're against democracy.
If the right tried to overturn the legitimate results of the election (as they would be if the recounts came out in Clinton's favor) by force then they will deserve the force they will be met with. This will be the second time the right has tried to overturn the results of a presidential election by force and you saw what happened last time. No one should have any patience for this sort of deranged rhetoric.
I specifically said "steal the election", not merely Hillary winning.
They would pretty much have to cheat at this point, wouldn't you think? No way they find 100k votes across 3 states to overturn this election legitimately.I specifically said "steal the election", not merely Hillary winning.
At this stage, her winning would be evidence of them stealing the election.What would you perceive as 'stealing the election' that is likely to happen in a recount?
well then onward 'christian' soldier.At this stage, her winning would be evidence of them stealing the election.
Same things that happened in New Mexico 2000 - all precincts have been counted and Bush is ahead - but wait, here's a bag we missed with five hundred Gore votes!What would you perceive as 'stealing the election' that is likely to happen in a recount?
500 votes here and there are at least believable or have an air of deniability. Finding a box of 100k Hillary votes would be undeniable fraud.Same things that happened in New Mexico 2000 - all precincts have been counted and Bush is ahead - but wait, here's a bag we missed with five hundred Gore votes!
Or Philly and Pittsburg pretty much every election - we reported 90% turnout, but now we have recounted and it is actually 125%.
Or Minnesota when Stuart Smalley was elected - while recounting we noticed that some ballots were in bad shape so we copied them, but we accidentally mixed them up and surprise, now the Democrat wins!
You know, the usual tricks, writ large this time. You guys are very, very good in recounts. Only in Florida 2000 did you get too blatant.
When has voter fraud ever stopped the Democrats from padding election counts? Werepossom was pretty specific on recent incidents where they lied, cheated and stole votes to push themselves into the win column.500 votes here and there are at least believable or have an air of deniability. Finding a box of 100k Hillary votes would be undeniable fraud.
Same things that happened in New Mexico 2000 - all precincts have been counted and Bush is ahead - but wait, here's a bag we missed with five hundred Gore votes!
Or Philly and Pittsburg pretty much every election - we reported 90% turnout, but now we have recounted and it is actually 125%.
Or Minnesota when Stuart Smalley was elected - while recounting we noticed that some ballots were in bad shape so we copied them, but we accidentally mixed them up and surprise, now the Democrat wins!
You know, the usual tricks, writ large this time. You guys are very, very good in recounts. Only in Florida 2000 did you get too blatant.
More false liberal pearl clutching. If this gets overturned there could only be fraud to blame, any other explanation wouldn't be credible.When has voter fraud ever stopped the Democrats from padding election counts? Werepossom was pretty specific on recent incidents where they lied, cheated and stole votes to push themselves into the win column.
Or Philly and Pittsburg pretty much every election - we reported 90% turnout, but now we have recounted and it is actually 125%.
It is worth noting that only three statewide elections since 2000 have overturned the apparent winner, and all three flipped to Democrat because of new votes found in heavily Democrat districts. The Minnesota Senatorial race and the 2004 Washington gubernatorial race, where King County counted hundreds more ballots than were given out (not to mention "accidentally" counting hundreds of provisional ballots, allowing hundreds of inelligible felons to vote, and counting votes of a score of dead people) stand out as particularly blatantly egregious. As Buckshot says, finding three bags of a hundred thousand votes would be blatant election stealing, but that doesn't mean it won't be tried. After all, it worked before . . .When has voter fraud ever stopped the Democrats from padding election counts? Werepossom was pretty specific on recent incidents where they lied, cheated and stole votes to push themselves into the win column.