here we go! Wisconsin recount is happening

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,706
6,198
126
Kelly Conway appearing on THIS WEEK with George Stephanopoulos sure was pissed and asking "I JUST DON'T KNOW WHY DEMOCRATS WILL NOT ACCEPT TRUMP AS PRESIDENT ELECT".

Kelly, I want to ask, "I DON'T KNOW WHY REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS WOULD NOT ACCEPT THE FACT BARACK OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT? AND FOR EIGHT F-ING YEARS FOR GODS SAKE...?"

Got an answer for THAT lady...?

I swear, Trump for the next 4 years is bad enough but I believe listening to Kelly Conway and Rudy Giuliani for the next 4 years could actually be worse.
Mirrors can be ugly things for some. It's what causes a lot of lipstick to appear on pigs.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
Kelly Conway appearing on THIS WEEK with George Stephanopoulos sure was pissed and asking "I DON'T KNOW WHY DEMOCRATS JUST WILL NOT ACCEPT TRUMP AS PRESIDENT ELECT".

Kelly, I want to ask, "I DON'T KNOW WHY REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS WOULD NOT ACCEPT THE FACT BARACK OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT? AND FOR EIGHT F-ING YEARS FOR GODS SAKE...?"

Got an answer for THAT lady...?

I swear, Trump for the next 4 years is bad enough but I believe listening to Kelly Conway and Rudy Giuliani for the next 4 years is actually worse.

Oh! I had a thought to post here which I'd come up with working in the kitchen. And I find your last line there. I'd been watching Conway on the CNN, and was starting to shout at the TV.

I'd always favored blondes before I found the right organ to think with. There's KellyAnn and Alice whats-er-name, with that smirk of hers. I could hope for a remake of the tasteless horror film featuring Colonel Spaulding -- "The Devil's Rejects" -- and the scene with the woman who couldn't see too well running into the highway with the 90,000 lb 90 mph MAC truck. In fact! There should be plenty of Halloween masks by next year, or the studio could make them. Line-em-up!

But here's my thought.

What was a T(ory) Party vote in a solid blue state worth this year? In CA, 62% voted for Clinton. As far as the electoral college, the 38% had no impact at all. They were defeated in CA, which was defeated for its electoral votes. In the popular vote, they were Losers again. Two-time Losers who thought they were losers and victims for their limited information-processing, supporting a big-time Loser who wouldn't reveal his taxes or he'd have to explain the blemish of Loss. A T-Party vote in CA was worth less than a slave's vote in Beulah-Land.

We kept the relatives away this year, making our T-Day dinner a total consensus. I had this idea for preparing the bird with certain high-capsicum peppers that would leave the T-babies totally speechless, and if they wanted to have a lack of PC, they were going to get it by the barrel. So we let them stay home.

But the real point of it: the relatives excluded are really Nobodies now!

A bunch of cheerleaders -- on the wrong team, and for the wrong team! How confused! And we're all Losers for it. Some -- bigger Losers for taking us to the Toilet-drain. The only consolation this year was the chance to smoke some Tea and be legal until the next court-house Sessions.

It's a difficult Holiday Season. But -- I found a solution for the remaining months.

For Christmas, I'm buying each Trumpie-relative the same three gifts: A fresh, large English cucumber, a walking stick, and a little red kazoo. A sort of silent message, suggesting a whole new meaning to the term "T Party."

And they don't need to give anything. They've already given us the heaviest gift of all: A Pile of Shit with a peacock feather.
 
Last edited:

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
814
81
91
Hillary supporters pre-election: "You Trumpets are going to have to accept the results of the election!"

Hillary supporters post election: "The election was rigged! We refuse to accept this and demand a recount!"
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,814
49,505
136
Hillary supporters pre-election: "You Trumpets are going to have to accept the results of the election!"

Hillary supporters post election: "The election was rigged! We refuse to accept this and demand a recount!"

You realize that recounts are totally compatible with accepting the outcome of an election, right? I mean why on earth would anyone think otherwise?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,334
15,128
136
How did Russia hack a state that had zero voting machines to hack?

Listen up you god damn ignorant twatwaffle, just because they didn't use electronic voting machines doesn't mean that the electronic counting machines weren't hacked.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
It doesn't make sense.
Why those that support Trump should be so outraged about a little recount?
Or even two or three state recounts?
Especially if they truly do believe they won the election fair and honest?
Something in their reaction just smells to high heaven.
It actually smells of probable fraudulent activity on Trump's part.
It's like they know something, expect something that they very very much fear.
Why those that support Clinton should be so outraged about a little Benghazi investigation? Or further email investigations? Something in their reaction just smells to high heaven. It actually smells of probable fraudulent activity on Clinton's part. It's like they know something, expect something that they very very much fear.

To Trump supporters, it's not so much a fight against a recount, it's just another indication that this will be a long set of years ahead with the left going absolutely bonkers over every slightest twinge. It's the realization that the unbearable smugness of the elitist lefties will only increase, not decrease.
 
Last edited:

jeff_in_MD

Member
Oct 7, 2016
51
5
36
Why those that support Clinton should be so outraged about a little Benghazi investigation? Or further email investigations? Something in their reaction just smells to high heaven. It actually smells of probable fraudulent activity on Clinton's part. It's like they know something, expect something that they very very much fear.
Let's see, there have already 3 or more congregational investigation into benghazi and the email issue plus every other investigation but there has NOT been any recounts of the vote. I'm sure you might see a difference.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,854
136
Let's see, there have already 3 or more congregational investigation into benghazi and the email issue plus every other investigation but there has NOT been any recounts of the vote. I'm sure you might see a difference.
"3 or more".

Hahaha.

Let's go with 8 official investigations that each turned up nothing. Just like the email server nothing burger.

But, it's all in the past now, you see, because...

Mission Accomplished!

But don't take my word on it!

Here, let Kevin McCarthy tell you.

https://youtu.be/6jIJ0g8EPs0
 

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
814
81
91


You just know Trump is laughing his ass off posting these, knowing it will trigger the left.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,854
136


You just know Trump is laughing his ass off posting these, knowing it will trigger the left.
Blatant lying triggers the left, because we're stuck living here in objective, observable reality.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
A recount has already happened, there isn't any possible way, outside of fraud, that they will find 10,000+ votes for Hillary. And there isn't any voting machines to hack in Michigan.

From your link-

Both the Michigan Republican Party and the campaign of Republican president-elect Donald Trump, who holds a 10,704 lead over Clinton in the state, also are looking for volunteers to be observers of the hand recount that will take place in the 83 counties where the votes were cast.

A hand recount will verify the accuracy of the electronic counting machines. Or not.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
Let's see, there have already 3 or more congregational investigation into benghazi and the email issue plus every other investigation but there has NOT been any recounts of the vote. I'm sure you might see a difference.

The challenged twiddle-brains never wanted to pursue the Truth on any of it in any scientific way. Look at their accusations: "She destroyed 33,000 e-mails!"

Does anyone think that a server in a large household like the Chappaqua home wouldn't get a lot of spam? From Home Depot? Ace Hardware? Sears? Tiffany's? Macy's? And consider the political spam I get almost every day. Imitating Carl Sagan -- I've deleted millions. . . .and millions . . . and millions.

And I got a classified document from National Archives which I forgot to copy with the special accession stamp they give you there. Arrest me! It was a single page of a spy-novel, most of which is still classified.

That's a very large hole in the sieve of possibilities -- a perspective of permutations and combinations.

Then, there's Benghazi. The terrorists in Libya didn't have in mind more than crude terrorism and expulsion of US diplomatic missions. The serious propagandists manufactured the event of the hearings. Four people dead because of a miscalculation. Yet, hardly a slap on the wrist to Obama's fuckstick predecessor for ignoring the low-level employee who noticed Arabs signing up for flight training without take-off and landing, or the 4,000 + Americans dead just to open up a Pandora's box with Bush's status-of-forces agreement.

A non-partisan commission void of political witch-hunt intentions would have discovered the causes and corrections, issued a report, and we would've moved on.

If you want to troubleshoot the e-mail problem, look to the career-service of the State Department corrupted by the Bush administration, for failing to develop a lock-tight policy for information security and preparing political appointees. For Clinton, she wanted to take her work home -- something no Republican would stomach for the government they think we're supposed to have.

She mixed up the public position's communications with that of the Foundation and the household. But we don't appoint cabinet officials to be IT experts, and we probably never had a situation with the former President's foundation work and Madam Secretary's converging on the same household or the same computer.

In fact, even Powell's term shows a certain cluelessness in the face of rapid technological change for those fast-paced positions. So I'm likely right: State Department careerists were deficient. Who is responsible for that, after eight years of the Nose-Picker?
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
My blood boils when I hear some chucklehead say the remainder of the country were "sore losers." 2 million votes and counting -- one of the biggest spreads to memory? Who the hell ya think you're talkin' to?

The mindset seems to be totally self-serving. Sarah Palin criticized the political-science notion of incrementalism. Linked to that, they defied the notion of compromise. It's like this is payback for the Civil War! "We win! You lose!"

Well, that's a "house divided," for sure. Fill the cannons with double cannisters, boys! Get ready for the next year! Let 'em have it in the face!
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
My blood boils when I hear some chucklehead say the remainder of the country were "sore losers." 2 million votes and counting -- one of the biggest spreads to memory? Who the hell ya think you're talkin' to?

The mindset seems to be totally self-serving. Sarah Palin criticized the political-science notion of incrementalism. Linked to that, they defied the notion of compromise. It's like this is payback for the Civil War! "We win! You lose!"

Well, that's a "house divided," for sure. Fill the cannons with double cannisters, boys! Get ready for the next year! Let 'em have it in the face!

You're looking at this the wrong way. Look at how unhinged President-Inept Trump and his all girl chorus has been since the news broke.

Enjoy the orange flavored tears....

and Hey, ladies. It's going to happen. It's unlikely to mean anything. Get over it.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,818
136
He's making the same evidence free allegations that Jill Stein is making...

The difference is that Stein is at least willing to look at evidence. Trump just hopes you accept his claims at face value and won't do the work to show that they're false.
 

Sinsear

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2007
6,439
80
91
The difference is that Stein is at least willing to look at evidence. Trump just hopes you accept his claims at face value and won't do the work to show that they're false.



Explain to me how you know each person's state of mind...
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
.....just because they didn't use electronic voting machines doesn't mean that the electronic counting machines weren't hacked.
Touch a nerve? Not sure why you have to get so abusive. Obviously you're confused so you lash out. If you need it explained to you, ask nicely.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,818
136
Explain to me how you know each person's state of mind...

Stein is opening election recounts. Trump not only isn't doing that, but has a history of both lying frequently and lying about having lied. It's like he never actually expects people to call him out on his bluffs... and when people do, doesn't know how to do anything besides insist the bluff was real.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,818
136
Trump's claims?!!? Are you kidding me?

Oh, I'm sorry, the conspiracy theory that he pulled out of his ass (or maybe Alex Jones' ass). Either way: Stein is at least trying to look for evidence, Trump has none and hasn't signalled any intention to look for it.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |