Originally posted by: The111
Originally posted by: theAnimal
Originally posted by: The111
Originally posted by: theAnimalHe's talking about static pressure, which is the ability of a fan to move air when there is an obstacle such as a grill or heatsink in the way.
That's not what static pressure is, and what you describe doesn't really make sense anyway. A fan pushes air from point A to point B. A grill in between those points is going to slow the air down no matter what fan made the original push. No fan imparts magical "grill avoidance abilities" to the air that it pushes.
The fact remains that some fans are better at dealing with obstacles to airflow. What is the correct term for this? I've always seen it defined as static pressure.
Once it leaves the fan, moving air is just moving air. It has mass and velocity.
The only thing that will make one airflow pass an obstacle more efficiently than another airflow is velocity, which is of course directly proportional to airflow (commonly measured in our fan specs as cfm).
Put simply, fast air will deal with an obstacle better than slow air. It's not rocket science (although actually it is the fundamentals of rocket science). It's why a 100mph gust will knock a tree over, while a 30mph gust just makes the leaves fall off.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_pressure
Static pressure decreases as airflow increases. However, if you treat total pressure as zero, then static pressure actually increases (in the negative direction) as airflow increases. So when you see a fan rated as "high static pressure" all the means is high velocity, which means high airflow or high cfm. So while it is true that "high static pressure" (in these terms) will help deal with "obstacles" (a grill or cooling block or radiator), it's not really the static pressure that's helping the air move through the obstacle, it's the speed of the flow. In other words, CFM is all that matters.
If somebody says, "fan A has good cfm but poor static pressure, while fan B has poor cfm but better static pressure," that makes no sense, really... unless you are considering flow variance within the cross-section, which is a whole other issue I hadn't considered, and I don't think most fan reviewers/raters are either... I think it's assumed to be a uniform cross section, in which case cfm and static pressure will always be correlated.