High School 'Sex Quiz' goes too far?

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,560
2
0
So shut your fucking mouth with the "you're not an authority" bullshit.

No. I'll call you whatever I want to call you. How you react/overreact to that is entirely your responsibility.

Can't have it both ways, champ.

People can comment on whatever they want to, but that doesn't exempt them or their comments from criticism. It applies as much to you as it does to me and to everyone else.
 
Last edited:

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
People can comment on whatever they want to, but that doesn't exempt them or their comments from criticism. It applies as much to you as it does to me and everyone else.

Also, people can AVOID commenting on items they do not like.

This isn't directed at you, it's directed to the assholes who love to read into every fucking comment and whine about their own personal pain over it.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
At what point along the intelligence and evolutionary curve do you start hyper sexualizing cartoons? (And cartoon animals, for that matter)

The hyper's in the mirror there, bud.

The pony thing is a play on sexualization. But of course you're so far out of the mainstream that you wouldn't catch that.

Miku has been exceedingly popular for years. The most innovative music anywhere right now is being done with VOCALOIDS. But you're probably too much of a stick-in-the-mud to listen to much of any music, eh? Wouldn't know enjoyment if it hit you in the face, and don't even have a clue what is going on when someone posts a popular singer.


And Rukia is god-tier. But you wouldn't know anything about that, either. You just speak out your ass to try to play a game of position, thinking that if you can come out on top in a social game of "king of the garbage heap" that that will make you infinitely right.
What a maroon.
I do not play your game. You are so stupid that you think that I do, but I do not. My position does not rest on you at all. I do not talk down to you to dig a hole for a model of you so that I can pretend that I am higher -- I talk down to you to inform you of your actual position with the hope that you will perhaps do something about it. You are beneath me and my peers. That is a simple fact, and it is no doing of mine.

Why do you not strive to join the intellectual elite? It is very nice up here -- conversations are epic.
Is it because you know you can't make it? That no matter how hard you try, you'll still be a joke? Is that why all you do is play games in the garbage, because high-tier garbage is the best you can ever hope to be? Because the deficiencies of your brain would be held in stark relief if you tried to rise above, and your weak little ego couldn't take being faced with the reality of that situation?

Have at your games. I'll just keep pointing out that you're playing a meaningless game in a pile of shit -- a slave to emotions that make you think you're accomplishing something, when all you're doing is training yourself in stupidity.
I can be here safely, for I have the perspective to see the natural training progression and can navigate it with ease. You cannot. You are limited to learning psychological defense after psychological defense, until you are completely trapped in a web where any idea is instantly rejected by your defense system.
But it's your life. And stupid people have always been slaves to their environment, so nothing new there.
Have fun with that.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
Why do you not strive to join the intellectual elite? It is very nice up here -- conversations are epic.
Is it because you know you can't make it? That no matter how hard you try, you'll still be a joke? Is that why all you do is play games in the garbage, because high-tier garbage is the best you can ever hope to be? Because the deficiencies of your brain would be held in stark relief if you tried to rise above, and your weak little ego couldn't take being faced with the reality of that situation?

I've been around the world to places you will never go, and accomplished things that you will never know.

You aspire to fuck a Japanese cartoon woman. (Your words, mind you)

Like I said, most of us will be just fine if we never reach "your level".
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
I've been around the world to places you will never go, and accomplished things that you will never know.

You aspire to fuck a Japanese cartoon woman. (Your words, mind you)

Like I said, most of us will be just fine if we never reach "your level".

The particulars of the mental gymnastics you have to go through to maintain your self-image are of no interest to me.

I am obviously of great importance to you, but you are of no importance to me. I haven't even looked past the first letter of your name.
"P" and a "d" in this thread. You could be Perknose for all I know.

I may keep a lookout for d's writing style in future threads. You, OTOH, will not be followed. You have no unique style, so I will not be able to differentiate your P from any other with generic skills.
That's just how I roll.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
The particulars of the mental gymnastics you have to go through to maintain your self-image are of no interest to me.

I am obviously of great importance to you, but you are of no importance to me. I haven't even looked past the first letter of your name.
"P" and a "d" in this thread. You could be Perknose for all I know.

I may keep a lookout for d's writing style in future threads. You, OTOH, will not be followed. You have no unique style, so I will not be able to differentiate your P from any other with generic skills.
That's just how I roll.

Don't let the door hit your pretty pony ass on the way out.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
And Rukia is god-tier.

Why do you not strive to join the intellectual elite? It is very nice up here -- conversations are epic.

You do understand that Bleach is not real life.

Right?

If that's what makes up your (fantasy) world of intelligence, I'll stay here with real folks, thank you very much.

In the end, its always going to be your left hand that brought you to climax. Not Rukia.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
You do understand that Bleach is not real life.

Right?

You do understand that the only thing you have access to are conceptual models...

Right?

Now, look at the people posting in the Babe Thread. They're posting pictures of people who are just as real as any character as far as anybody on this forum's life is concerned. None of the posters will ever interact with any of those women physically, yet they still post pictures as though there is something of value there.

Rukia is better characterized than any of them. She is meant to represent a human woman, that goal was achieved in remarkable fashion, and I can value it as it pertains to that.


You likely have a mind made of mush and so need to keep your anxiety level high over the fear of seepage between mental compartments, and you respond by keeping your compartments separated by chasms. I do not suffer from that problem. My compartments don't leak, meaning I can stack them one right next to another. Being that my walls are so well defined, I can resize with ease as I always have a firm grasp of where they are. This gives me considerable freedom.
My compartment for Rukia is of an extent that would undoubtedly break your mind to copy. In your modeling of me you are correctly predicting the shattering of your mental boundaries, but you go wrong when you assume that a run through your mind accurately represents a run through mine.

I can perform mental feats that the average person cannot. If you wish to understand anything about me, your model of me must contain openness to the reality that I am not necessarily tied to any mental model. Holding me rigidly to the results of runs through stereotypes and/or self simply will not work.

Assigning leeway is the only way one can make room for a mind greater than their own.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
You do understand that the only thing you have access to are conceptual models...

Right?

Now, look at the people posting in the Babe Thread. They're posting pictures of people who are just as real as any character as far as anybody on this forum's life is concerned. None of the posters will ever interact with any of those women physically, yet they still post pictures as though there is something of value there.

Rukia is better characterized than any of them. She is meant to represent a human woman, that goal was achieved in remarkable fashion, and I can value it as it pertains to that.


You likely have a mind made of mush and so need to keep your anxiety level high over the fear of seepage between mental compartments, and you respond by keeping your compartments separated by chasms. I do not suffer from that problem. My compartments don't leak, meaning I can stack them one right next to another. Being that my walls are so well defined, I can resize with ease as I always have a firm grasp of where they are. This gives me considerable freedom.
My compartment for Rukia is of an extent that would undoubtedly break your mind to copy. In your modeling of me you are correctly predicting the shattering of your mental boundaries, but you go wrong when you assume that a run through your mind accurately represents a run through mine.

I can perform mental feats that the average person cannot. If you wish to understand anything about me, your model of me must contain openness to the reality that I am not necessarily tied to any mental model. Holding me rigidly to the results of runs through stereotypes and/or self simply will not work.

Assigning leeway is the only way one can make room for a mind greater than their own.

From your link, See also
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,560
2
0
You do understand that the only thing you have access to are conceptual models...

Right?

Now, look at the people posting in the Babe Thread. They're posting pictures of people who are just as real as any character as far as anybody on this forum's life is concerned. None of the posters will ever interact with any of those women physically, yet they still post pictures as though there is something of value there.

Rukia is better characterized than any of them. She is meant to represent a human woman, that goal was achieved in remarkable fashion, and I can value it as it pertains to that.


You likely have a mind made of mush and so need to keep your anxiety level high over the fear of seepage between mental compartments, and you respond by keeping your compartments separated by chasms. I do not suffer from that problem. My compartments don't leak, meaning I can stack them one right next to another. Being that my walls are so well defined, I can resize with ease as I always have a firm grasp of where they are. This gives me considerable freedom.
My compartment for Rukia is of an extent that would undoubtedly break your mind to copy. In your modeling of me you are correctly predicting the shattering of your mental boundaries, but you go wrong when you assume that a run through your mind accurately represents a run through mine.

I can perform mental feats that the average person cannot. If you wish to understand anything about me, your model of me must contain openness to the reality that I am not necessarily tied to any mental model. Holding me rigidly to the results of runs through stereotypes and/or self simply will not work.

Assigning leeway is the only way one can make room for a mind greater than their own.

Boasting is not a very intelligent thing to do. The presence of intelligence conveys itself on its own, not through assertion by the person who claims to possess it.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
Boasting is not a very intelligent thing to do. The presence of intelligence conveys itself on its own, not through assertion by the person who claims to possess it.

Who said I was trying to project my intelligence?

In order to get intelligence across fully you need a willing and capable viewer. But the rabble on this board plays nothing but crude games of position, so they are not willing lest they undermine their position. They also have no procedures whatsoever to test an argument for validity. They have no clue how a logical argument works. They are limited to knee-jerk reactions to surface features of posted statements. There is no mental activity beyond that.

So they can't trace out my belief structures and judge me on the technical merits, and they are defended against base imagery because all these retards do is bluster; so why would I bother putting effort into a projection? They fall off the trail long before they come close to me.

The underlying factors of this aren't something that can be fought from within P&N. Unless the mods come in here and start handing out vacations for low-quality posts, the completely incompetent cannot be weeded out and the remainder will have no incentive to improve. It will remain an insult-fest because quality posting isn't worth the effort in an ecosystem where the pot-shot is haute couture.
These people cannot hold themselves to a high standard so the culture has collapsed into a shit-fest. As I cannot fix this with the tools at my disposal, I might as well jump in. My adding shit to the steaming pile that is P&N doesn't hurt anything.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,560
2
0
Who said I was trying to project my intelligence?

A few examples:

You likely have a mind made of mush

.. implying that you do not.

I can perform mental feats that the average person cannot.

.. implying that your intelligence is greater than that of the average person.

Assigning leeway is the only way one can make room for a mind greater than their own.

.. implying that your mind is greater than another poster's mind.

In order to get intelligence across fully you need a willing and capable viewer. But the rabble on this board plays nothing but crude games of position, so they are not willing lest they undermine their position. They also have no procedures whatsoever to test an argument for validity. They have no clue how a logical argument works. They are limited to knee-jerk reactions to surface features of posted statements. There is no mental activity beyond that.

Your assessment of the willingness and capabilities to understand and acknowledge the intelligence of others is naive. There's little doubt that the banter on P&N isn't terribly logical, refined, or rigorous. That does not suggest definitively, as you've stated, that those who post here are unwilling and incapable of logical arguments and rigorous debate. The fact that they don't practice those abilities here doesn't mean they're incapable or unwilling to practice them in general. Perhaps this is just entertainment for them (as it is for me). This is the Internet, after all.. expectations should be low.

So they can't trace out my belief structures and judge me on the technical merits, and they are defended against base imagery because all these retards do is bluster; so why would I bother putting effort into a projection? They fall off the trail long before they come close to me.

Indeed, why would you bother. Yet you continue to assert through explicit statement your intellectual dominance.

The underlying factors of this aren't something that can be fought from within P&N. Unless the mods come in here and start handing out vacations for low-quality posts, the completely incompetent cannot be weeded out and the remainder will have no incentive to improve. It will remain an insult-fest because quality posting isn't worth the effort in an ecosystem where the pot-shot is haute couture.
These people cannot hold themselves to a high standard so the culture has collapsed into a shit-fest. As I cannot fix this with the tools at my disposal, I might as well jump in. My adding shit to the steaming pile that is P&N doesn't hurt anything.

Then the inescapable question is why do you read these threads and post here? If for entertainment or recreation, why would you bother criticizing others' crude remarks and assert your intellectual superiority? If for serious debate and discussion, you've clearly failed at the expectations game. If something that you cannot control doesn't meet your expectations, either alter your expectations or avoid that something altogether.
 
Last edited:

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
Boasting is not a very intelligent thing to do. The presence of intelligence conveys itself on its own, not through assertion by the person who claims to possess it.

I'm glad we found something to agree on in this thread.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
A few examples:

Random statements about underlying truths != image projection. There's a difference between fact and mental manipulation.

As I have already said, I do not have the tools available to me to fix P&N, so I have no interest in building up the rabble. What they think is a mere scientific curiosity, it has no social value.

That does not suggest definitively, as you've stated, that those who post here are unwilling and incapable of logical arguments and rigorous debate.

The fact that I often leave off the modal operator does not suggest definitively that I do not properly calculate modalities.

pwnt


Indeed, why would you bother. Yet you continue to assert through explicit statement your intellectual dominance.

Yup. Facts are facts.

Then the inescapable question is why do you read these threads and post here? If for entertainment or recreation, why would you bother criticizing others' crude remarks and assert your intellectual superiority?

I already answered that.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,560
2
0
Random statements about underlying truths != image projection. There's a difference between fact and mental manipulation.

Underlying truths and facts, huh? There's no evidence, much less proof, that you're intellectually superior to anyone else... and there's no evidence, much less proof, that anyone else is intellectually inferior to you. Given this lack of evidence and proof, statements of what you believe to be underlying truths can only be interpreted by your audience (others on this forum) as image projection.

As I have already said, I do not have the tools available to me to fix P&N, so I have no interest in building up the rabble. What they think is a mere scientific curiosity, it has no social value.

The megalomania continues...

The fact that I often leave off the modal operator does not suggest definitively that I do not properly calculate modalities.
pwnt

The proper calculation of modalities that you claim occurs is neither explicitly expressed nor suggested in anything you communicate on this forum. Therefore, its existence cannot be assumed or claimed.

Yup. Facts are facts.

The megalomania continues...

I already answered that.

Specimens for the microscope, huh? The megalomania and arrogance continues even further...
 
Last edited:

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,391
31
91
Underlying truths and facts, huh? There's no evidence, much less proof, that you're intellectually superior to anyone else... and there's no evidence, much less proof, that anyone else is intellectually inferior to you.

See "image projection" above.

That there is insufficient evidence within your field of perception does not imply that there is insufficient evidence within mine.


The proper calculation of modalities that you claim occurs is neither explicitly expressed nor suggested in anything you communicate on this forum. Therefore, it cannot be presumed to exist.

First learn what "presume" means, and then try it.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,560
2
0
See "image projection" above.

That there is insufficient evidence within your field of perception does not imply that there is insufficient evidence within mine.

The megalomaniac is never as critical of himself as he is of others... and his self-portrait is always prettier to himself than it is to everyone else.

Fields of perception are invariably biased by the relationship between whose field it is and what is he/she perceiving. When this relationship is "both are the same" perceptions are even more dubious.
 
Last edited:

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
The quiz is totally without good taste. It has no redeeming value, and I think I would just ball it up and throw it away, right back at the front of the room. Some teachers are just stupid and deserve to be fired.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |