lol you trolls crack me up saying bulldozer was a failure. benchmarks are shit for reading they are always different depending on hardware AMD is smart releasing more cores then threads. You people ever notice more and more games are being used by AMD for development? because they have all the extra space on there CPU to build better multi threaded games. (more details and clutter. lol) bulldozer was not meant for speeds. sure its 3.6Ghz but it was built for running immense multiple/multithreaded applications at the same time without the performance loss so you can understand why they weren't good at "benchmarks" and now that games and apps are being built more around AMD we can see optimized game play on multi threaded cpu's (i personal would pick more cores over threads because of the fact i have so much breathing room without having to worry about switching Core Affinities) and hyper transport is just like hyper threading except it has more bandwidth cross the cpu for information to be processed.
Read the ones posted by fatamericaplease the AMD - 4320 4.0Ghz stock quad core beats any intel quad right now lol silly little noobs
Christian Espritu said:Take note, the founder of AMD was once a CEO of Intel. He founded AMD because he thought Intel had no competitor, and Intel was all alone in the CPU market. Hence, AMD.
Intel4ever said:Well, here's the deal Danny. Intel makes some great boards for "stability" and high end performance which means you will "pay" for that. High end = high $$$$$. This simple truth does not always hold true for the the main stream. There is so much to express to you that it is virtually impossible but simply put, you need to look at reviews versus features versus "how much do people really know" found in those reviews. IF you have patience and perfrom "due diligence" on the web, you WILL find truth. Understand? I hope so. The website I have refered has done me well and great RMA and customer service. Be warned, I have seen Ignorance a lack of PC knowledge ABOUND.
Last but not least, If I would buy it, you may do well to follow suit. If not, so be it and good luck to you my friend.
Jean-Francois Bouchard said:I think you are unable to read. I don't care about performance. I care about application. What are you doing with that super Intel chip ? Nothing. And no, game is NOT cpu intensive. Its GPU intensive. A mid grande CPU is all good. And if your OS force you to upgrade you CPU maybe you need to rethink. Thanks again for talking about my budget and ignorance.
lol you trolls crack me up saying bulldozer was a failure. benchmarks are shit for reading they are always different depending on hardware AMD is smart releasing more cores then threads. You people ever notice more and more games are being used by AMD for development? because they have all the extra space on there CPU to build better multi threaded games. (more details and clutter. lol) bulldozer was not meant for speeds. sure its 3.6Ghz but it was built for running immense multiple/multithreaded applications at the same time without the performance loss so you can understand why they weren't good at "benchmarks" and now that games and apps are being built more around AMD we can see optimized game play on multi threaded cpu's (i personal would pick more cores over threads because of the fact i have so much breathing room without having to worry about switching Core Affinities) and hyper transport is just like hyper threading except it has more bandwidth cross the cpu for information to be processed.
You should be thanking these guys for buying the AMD hardware that you are unwilling to buy (because you know better... although I can make a pretty good argument for some portions of AMD's lineup, especially if you want want ECC on the cheap). These guys are supporting the lone competitor to Intel in the performance x86 CPU market. They are helping keep AMD afloat and thus helping keep competition alive, which helps the overall market pricing for end consumers.
Maybe but they're not doing it for those reasons, they're doing it because they are fooking morons lol.
They're the same idiots that went out and bought a P4 because it had more jigglefurtz than the AMD equivalent.
Yeah I know they aren't doing it for those reasons, but I still appreciate their existence anyway, as explained above.
But you don't appreciate their existence in computer forums right?
What is the purpose of this thread? To show ignorant trolls from both camps fighting each other over a CPU @ endgadged?
What is the purpose of this thread? To show ignorant trolls from both camps fighting each other over a CPU @ endgadged?
What is the purpose of this thread? To show ignorant trolls from both camps fighting each other over a CPU @ endgadged?
Comic relief. Same reason most people will watch the US presidential debates and then talk afterwards about what they saw.
It looks like wasting BW on nonsense to me...
That first one was pretty funny . I have seen a couple of bigger trolls in the XS news forum . They were good trolls tho succeed in getting good people banned