P.S. I could care less if there's a female POTUS. Likely it'll be a Dem. Could you all just elect someone this time who actually has some real world experience other than community organizer? Hillary would actually have been preferable to the guy that wanted to run to set himself up for a later POTUS win but ended up winning the nomination because of no one liking Hillary...er, I mean, your O'Bummer.
Actually, there's no reason the first female POTUS can't be a woman.
Something that would help is that while most 'feminists' are already democrats, so they gain few new votes except for some non-voters, Republicans get a big crossover.
Like Margaret Thatcher, gender doesn't matter, it's about whose interests they serve. We sadly have plenty of misguided right-wing women, think Liz Cheney as an example.
What they're lacking more is experience - only Condi came close to that, Christine Todd Whitman was expelled for daring not to completely cave to polluters as told to.
But they've even give that up, as the near-elevation of Sarah Palin to have a good chance to be President was embraced by Republicans in 2008.
Showing they have *no* standards, really, to get power, except to serve the right interests. If they'll put Sarah Palin in the Presidency, who is unqualified?
Sadly, the same could be said of George Bush - the real criterion seems to be, what con man's face can get Americans to vote for them to implement corrupt policies?
'Oh, I like that George Bush, those steely blue eyes, I trust him, he's the guy I'd like to have a beer with, I'm going to vote for him, not shifty Gore or Frenchie Kerry.'
Last edited: