I would not worry about it. Clinton has been chosen as the designated nominee for the Democratic party. She will not be charged with any crimes.
It does not matter if the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.
What the heck does anything being discussed here have to do with Obama?
How could Hillary be the chosen one w/o the approval of the master of Kenyan voodoo mooslim time warp mind control? That's why Repubs can't uncover the truth about Benghazi, isn't it?
See . . . . I have this theory -- a weak one for sure, and about as crazy as they come, but that's the point.
Obama killed Kennedy in '63. He was just a little over 2 years old, but he did it with telekinetic, clairvoyant, Vulcan-Mind-Meld powers.
And he made America look like a wuss. Gotta put in some carriers and transports and kick ass in the Middle East. . . . . And screw those BLM scheisters chargin' me for what's free. . . .
So true; ever since Black Lives Matter leader Jade Helmsley was awarded the deed to Nevada, even the Germans have stopped bombing Pearl Bailey.
God Bless Vespuchiland.
blah blah blah
How could Hillary be the chosen one w/o the approval of the master of Kenyan voodoo mooslim time warp mind control? That's why Repubs can't uncover the truth about Benghazi, isn't it?
FBI's Clinton probe expands to public corruption track
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.
This track is in addition to the focus on classified material found on Clinton’s personal server.
"The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed," one source said.
The development follows press reports over the past year about the potential overlap of State Department and Clinton Foundation work, and questions over whether donors benefited from their contacts inside the administration.
The Clinton Foundation is a public charity, known as a 501(c)(3). It had grants and contributions in excess of $144 million in 2013, the most current available data.
Inside the FBI, pressure is growing to pursue the case.
One intelligence source told Fox News that FBI agents would be “screaming” if a prosecution is not pursued because “many previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.”
The FBI is particularly on edge in the wake of how the case of former CIA Director David Petraeus was handled.
One of the three sources said some FBI agents felt Petraeus was given a slap on the wrist for sharing highly classified information with his mistress and biographer Paula Broadwell, as well as lying to FBI agents about his actions. Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in March 2015 after a two-plus-year federal investigation in which Attorney General Eric Holder initially declined to prosecute.
In the Petraeus case, the exposure of classified information was assessed to be limited.
By contrast, in the Clinton case, the number of classified emails has risen to at least 1,340. A 2015 appeal by the State Department to challenge the “Top Secret” classification of at least two emails failed and, as Fox News first reported, is now considered a settled matter.
It is unclear which of the two lines of inquiry was opened first by the FBI and whether they eventually will be combined and presented before a special grand jury. One intelligence source said the public corruption angle dates back to at least April 2015. On their official website, the FBI lists "public corruption as the FBI's top criminal priority."
Fox News is told that about 100 special agents assigned to the investigations also were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, with as many as 50 additional agents on “temporary duty assignment,” or TDY. The request to sign a new NDA could reflect that agents are handling the highly classified material in the emails, or serve as a reminder not to leak about the case, or both.
"The pressure on the lead agents is brutal," a second source said. "Think of it like a military operation, you might need tanks called in along with infantry."
Separately, a former high-ranking State Department official emphasized to Fox News that Clinton’s deliberate non-use of her government email address may be increasingly “significant.”
“It is virtually automatic when one comes on board at the State Department to be assigned an email address,” the source said.
“It would have taken an affirmative act not to have one assigned ... and it would also mean it was all planned out before she took office. This certainly raises questions about the so-called legal advice she claimed to have received from inside the State Department that what she was doing was proper."
On Sunday, when asked about her email practices while secretary of state, Clinton insisted to CBS News’ "Face The Nation," "there is no there, there."
It's so odd people can understand mockery here but can't understand it when Trump does it and think he's serious...
It's like a House of Cards episode.With the additional corruption track to the investigation (along with the classified emails), I'm sure there is some pressure to go after her like they would anyone else, but there's no way the bosses are going to let that happen. Charges against her can not and will not be allowed under any circumstances, the party is all-in on her.
You would think repubs would be all for Hillary getting the nomination, since She presents the best chance for them to win the election. Bernie polls better against any repub candidate. Maybe they really want to lose yet again, it's easier to blame the other team then have to make excuses when your policies fail.
This statement warrants piss and shit....
Not every paragraph in a classified document is marked as such. I work in an environment where I have access to classified information and have on several occasions removed (unclassified) information from a SCIF that was previously harvested out of a classified document. It's called sanitizing and it sounds to me as if that was what she instructed her aide to do with whatever it was.... turn into nonpaper? Don't know what that means, but the intent could well be interpreted as "Sanitize it and send it!"
Past that, who knows what was actually sent or even if anything was sent at all...
This is just more mental masturbation. Nothing more, nothing less.
Polls at this point mean very little. If you were to ask GOP insiders who they would prefer to be the candidate (hildabeast or other), I'm guessing they'd pick "other". Nobody has the enormous warchest hildabeast has, with the loyal following of lefty idiots, feminists and the media in the bag. Bernie is more likeable for sure, but doesn't have all those things going for him.
Yep, Otherwise known as a trusted download. Not uncommon at all. Heck, there's even standard procedures for it.
You would think repubs would be all for Hillary getting the nomination, since She presents the best chance for them to win the election. Bernie polls better against any repub candidate. Maybe they really want to lose yet again, it's easier to blame the other team then have to make excuses when your policies fail.
Yet you seem convinced that she is without guilt. How are you any different than those who presume guilt?Well, yeh, but that doesn't counter the playing of partisan fools who think they know things that they don't. Hell, they'll eagerly believe anything that justifies their attitude.
Exactly what facts do you think were presented to you in that article? Can we all assume that your lack of a comment on the piece was done for a reason, you know, so you can claim you were just passing on information and had no opinion as to its validity?