Yes, it does. I did a few searches and nothing came up, and didn't recall a strong outcry after Gore lost. I stand corrected.
Yes, it does. I did a few searches and nothing came up, and didn't recall a strong outcry after Gore lost. I stand corrected.Yep.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-calls-for-end-to-electoral-college/
Does that change your mind?
My opinion is she fired back but in a Wellesley College I'm smarter than you and I know it snotty way. She lacked the social skills of Bill.
This is a failing of many Democrats over the decades.
Politics is like branding. You can have the best product on the market, but you need to sell it.Or is it the failing of voters who value social skills/charisma over competence and actual policy positions.
Politics is like branding. You can have the best product on the market, but you need to sell it.
Clinton was a great brand but a sh!tty salesperson.
Again, is it the fault of a 'non charismatic' politician or the fault of a shallow, thoughtless electorate.
Or is it the failing of voters who value social skills/charisma over competence and actual policy positions.
The Electoral College decided that it was time to eliminate Hitlary Clinton. and won.Yet another thing she's right about.
The Electoral College decided that it was time to eliminate Hitlary Clinton. and won.
A little bit of both, with the media thrown into the mix for good measureAgain, is it the fault of a 'non charismatic' politician or the fault of a shallow, thoughtless electorate.
Fskihole, in the last major election in California, Republicans didn't even have the opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate as their Senator because of a system that you support. Imagine, 1/2 of Californians disenfranchised because of a slimy backdoor way in choosing a Senator. No wonder you hate the fairest system that the United States has come up with . So fsk you and fsk the nasty little slimy systems you want to come up with to insure your choice wins.The only thing that has stopped me from recommending to you that what you post could be easily replicated by a bot is that I'm wondering if that's already happened. lol.
Fskihole, in the last major election in California, Republicans didn't even have the opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate as their Senator because of a system that you support. Imagine, 1/2 of Californians disenfranchised because of a slimy backdoor way in choosing a Senator. No wonder you hate the fairest system that the United States has come up with . So fsk you and fsk the nasty little slimy systems you want to come up with to insure your choice wins.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/californias-no-republican-senate-race/article/2004578
A little bit of both, with the media thrown into the mix for good measure
They didn't have an opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate because their candidate was the third most popular candidate in the primary, lol.
You're arguing for a system where the third place candidate gets to make it to the general election over the second place candidate for no other reason than they happen to belong to your preferred political party, hahaha. Even better, you think preferring the third place candidate over the second place one is the FAIR solution.
Oh god, hahahaha. This is amazing. Keep on telling us more about how giving Republicans extra special electoral preference is the FAIR way to do things. The idea that you're enraged by not getting electoral welfare makes it even funnier. Tell us more about all the electoral welfare you need so you can implement your policies saying welfare is bad. Hahahaha.
At least the citizens of California got the choice of voting for Hillary Clinton.
No choice at all for voting for a Republican for their Senator.
Thanks for this input from the Ministry of Truth though.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/elections/sd-me-vg-casenate-20161023-story.html
At least the citizens of California got the choice of voting for Hillary Clinton.
No choice at all for voting for a Republican for their Senator.
Thanks for this input from the Ministry of Truth though.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/elections/sd-me-vg-casenate-20161023-story.html
Fskihole, in the last major election in California, Republicans didn't even have the opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate as their Senator because of a system that you support. Imagine, 1/2 of Californians disenfranchised because of a slimy backdoor way in choosing a Senator. No wonder you hate the fairest system that the United States has come up with . So fsk you and fsk the nasty little slimy systems you want to come up with to insure your choice wins.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/californias-no-republican-senate-race/article/2004578
Would you like one of these as well?
Nope, I don't live in California, I very happily live in Texas, but you can see why I don't give a rats ass about the whiny little bitches crying about the Electoral College when what they would do to conservatives and Republicans is far, far worse if they get the chance.
Nope, I don't live in California, I very happily live in Texas, but you can see why I don't give a rats ass about the whiny little bitches crying about the Electoral College when what they would do to conservatives and Republicans is far, far worse if they get the chance.
Nope, I don't live in California, I very happily live in Texas, but you can see why I don't give a rats ass about the whiny little bitches crying about the Electoral College when what they would do to conservatives and Republicans is far, far worse if they get the chance.
It was a concessions to the
The truth is the EC is no benefit to small states, that is a myth. It is a massive benefit to swing states. No one campaigns in Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Road Island, etc during the general because all of their EC votes are locked up.
If the EC went away they would actually have to campaign to the entire country, not the 7 states that might actually swing. The idea that without the EC they'd only campaign to a handful of metros is not based on anything other than a Republican talking point.
Democrats gerrymandered the entire State. Again I can see why you're in favor of it. It was gerrymandered in your favor.You mean... gerrymander them into submission & irrelevance? Oh, wait... they'd have to beat Repubs at their own game for that....
Gotta love it. Conservatives have been raving about how "We're the Majority!" when the only way they have majority representation is by rigging the game...
Democrats gerrymandered the entire State. Again I can see why you're in favor of it. It was gerrymandered in your favor.