Wow those latest Fury #'s.
Fury AIR @ stock is same FPS as a 28% OC'd 980 TI (1380mhz)! HOLY COW
Will be interesting to see what Fury Nano and Fury X get. Will show how clocks / shaders matter in this title.
It's actually only king of the hill (in single GPU config) due to it's OC ability vs Fury X.
In the stock form, Fury X has actually got it beat for awhile now, when you factor a lot of games (TPU, Swedeclockers etc).
Add these new games like The Division, Far Cry Primal, Hitman and soon Ashes to the list, Fury X's lead will grow.
As modern games in 2016 replace older games in benchmarks, it will be a clear separation, and OC 980Ti will be needed to maintain parity.
This is the EXACT same scenario as the R290X vs 780Ti in 2014, where the 780Ti had the lead and over time we see the R290X catch up, beat it and now in new games, just so far ahead.
Only in one game I saw FuryX leading 980Ti and it is in Hitman rest either its a wash or Ti leading.The thing is you don't even have to oc 980 Ti that much because the non ref models got you covered.
And Ashes of The Singularity
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-02/...mm-asynchronous-compute-3840-2160-high-preset
If I have to count games where Ti leads I think the list will be really a lot bigger so yeah 980 Ti is still the top dog in sgpu configs and mind you it is not even the full chip.
I have only commented on the single game, now we are at two games. Im sure the more DX-12 game releases, the more wins will be for the Fury X.
Indeed, let's hope more games are built based on their original 2006 source code.If we are talking about DX 12 games then we have to give GOW to 980Ti too.
If we are talking about DX 12 games then we have to give GOW to 980Ti too.
DX12 puts all the efforts on developers. And their first target is GCN 1.1 on Xbox One. Same reason why there is such a difference between GCN 1.1 and 1.0/1.2 on the other side.
Try again in 2-3 years and see how it goes
If you worry about DX12, get a GCN 1.1 card with 8GB. Because then you are console port secured.
You mean try again when nvidia has hardware that can actually dx 12 and spotting more than 1 queue :sneaky:
Is that why we see Tonga regression and GCN 1.0 stagnant?
They're choking it on vram and bandwidth, still comfortably ahead of the cards they compete with. One sku faltering is your example of bad dx12 implementation ha?
If it was bandwidth the 960 wouldn't be where it is. And VRAM isn't the issue either
If it was bandwidth the 960 wouldn't be where it is. And VRAM isn't the issue either
Yay, in DX12 games, the 980Ti wins in games in which DX12 regresses performance compared to DX11. And the 980Ti wins in games in which they are extremely broken at launch in DX12.
The 980Ti doesn't need any justification to stand.
It's the 980Ti, there should be no song and dance defending it. It was the best GPU this generation.... this generation is ending. It will still stay close to the top. The other Maxwell GPUs on the other hand they are screwed for some reason. Not sure what it is that the 980Ti doesn't suffer in DX12 but the other Maxwell GPUs do.
DX12 puts all the efforts on developers. And their first target is GCN 1.1 on Xbox One. Same reason why there is such a difference between GCN 1.1 and 1.0/1.2 on the other side.
Try again in 2-3 years and see how it goes
If you worry about DX12, get a GCN 1.1 card with 8GB. Because then you are console port secured.
So let me get this straight,the DX 12 performance only matters when AMD is ahead? gotcha, thanks for the clarification :thumbsup:
When games lose performance it completely defeats the point of DX12.
DX12 is "good" when performance actually improves for cards since its only "features" are lower cpu overhead and allowing the gpu to work faster.
When games lose performance it completely defeats the point of DX12.