I really don't get it. @ 7:52 the cop hands this dumb bitch a case# for the crime she is reporting and then replies "I'm not the one that was attacked. She was (referring to her friend)"
wtf? I thought she was the one claiming to be attacked?
Paraphrasing:
"And if I like you know like you know like get hit like one more time like I like you know will be like mad." /facepalm
Dammit, I just lost brain cells from trying to read that..smh!!
I shall now correct that and add that Texans must punch like pussies.
Yeah, you're probably right. Those hippy liberals in our bastard child known as Austin probably do hit like pussies
It's Austin, that's Texas light.MEA CULPA, poor reading on my part. I saw NYC on the first line and went wrong from there regarding locale.
I shall now correct that and add that Texans must punch like pussies.
So what you’re telling us is that you’re not going to rush to judgment this time as the facts of the situation do not completely support the narrative of the alleged victim.An entire bar including the staff attacked her for wearing a MAGA hat? Hmmm. Maybe we need to search for cancelled checks from some Norwegian bodybuilders.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/you...tacked-wearing-maga-hat-austin-134813834.html
Dressing provocatively is designed to have people be attracted to you, not commit a sex crime against you.Dressing provocatively is designed to have people be attracted to you, not commit a sex crime against you. Wearing these hats is done specifically to provoke others.
In no way does anyone's style of dress excuse violence or criminal activity against them but you'll also see these clowns get shocked, shocked I tell you when people ask them to leave or say nasty things to them.
It's hard to imagine what would cause an entire bar full of people to separately come to the conclusion that they should attack these people. My guess would be they got in an argument with someone that led to a fight and then the people in the bar forcibly ejected them.
Dressing provocatively is designed to have people be attracted to you, not commit a sex crime against you.
Sorry but no, the reason behind the wearing of provocative or the purpose behind it is irrelevant, the moment you justify instigating violence because of it YOU ARE 100% AT FAULT, regardless whether it is a MAGA hat, turban, low cut dress, a rainbow shirt, etc.
that wishy-washy logic is why women are told they can wear what they want, but then they are blamed for provoking/instigating rape/sexual assault based on what they wear.
If a stupid hat provokes someone to violence, they are the problem.Did you not read the rest of my post or something? You’re just repeating my point.
Violence is never justified but these whiners complain about people talking shit to them when they wear those stupid hats when they are wearing them for the express purpose of provoking people.
Did you not read the rest of my post or something? You’re just repeating my point.
Violence is never justified but these whiners complain about people talking shit to them when they wear those stupid hats when they are wearing them for the express purpose of provoking people.
If a stupid hat provokes someone to violence, they are the problem.
If you wear an outfit designed to draw attention, don’t whine when men rape youYet again, nobody is arguing that violence is justified by it.
What I am saying is if you wear a hat designed to provoke arguments don’t whine when people argue with you, kick you out, etc.
If you wear an outfit designed to draw attention, don’t whine when men rape you
If you wear a hairstyle that does not fit traditional corporate norms, don’t whine when you don’t get the job.
You’re argument really doesn’t fly in a rational society governed by laws.
Now you and I both know some people wear these hats to trigger those libs, but I don’t have a whole lot of respect for the snowflakes wearing the hats or the snowflakes triggered by them.
If you wear an outfit designed to draw attention, don’t whine when men rape you
If you wear a hairstyle that does not fit traditional corporate norms, don’t whine when you don’t get the job.
You’re argument really doesn’t fly in a rational society governed by laws.
Now you and I both know some people wear these hats to trigger those libs, but I don’t have a whole lot of respect for the snowflakes wearing the hats or the snowflakes triggered by them.
Dressing provocatively is designed to have people be attracted to you, not commit a sex crime against you.
Sorry but no, the reason behind the wearing of provocative or the purpose behind it is irrelevant, the moment you justify instigating violence because of it YOU ARE 100% AT FAULT, regardless whether it is a MAGA hat, turban, low cut dress, a rainbow shirt, etc.
that wishy-washy logic is why women are told they can wear what they want, but then they are blamed for provoking/instigating rape/sexual assault based on what they wear.
Like x9001
Hit. The. Nail. On. The. Fucking. Head.
Lbierals are the queens of double standards.
View attachment 4198
Except he’s arguing against a point that literally no one in this thread has expressed.
Like... no one.
Wearing these hats is done specifically to provoke others.
In no way does anyone's style of dress excuse violence or criminal activity against them
I read your posts. You are contradicting yourself. You are condemning violence, but also rationalizing that we should treat people by how they present themselves. That is simply not how society works.Huh? It seems obvious you never read my posts either. I have now explicitly and repeatedly stated that dress does not justify criminal behavior. Can you acknowledge this? I can quote the relevant posts if that helps.
My argument is not just right, no one can seriously argue otherwise. How you present yourself affects how others treat you. She got exactly what she wanted and then whined when she got it. (An argument, the violence appears to be a hoax on her part)
I get what you're saying - but you have some clear cut quotes here where you're indirectly implying it is the fault of the person wearing the hat that the event occurred. This quote is EXACTLY that. No - you can't presume that just because someone wears a MAGA hat that they are intending to provoke violence - that is obscene and ridiculous.
And I get it - your next quote is your version of a "safe word" message where you backtrack on your previous sentence:
But the point still stands. It's just like liberals that try to say "Women can wear whatever they want!" (See partial nudes above) - And some people ask the obvious question of "Well, what were you wearing that might have instigated such an attack?" That's exactly what you just did for a related subject.
That is hypocrisy 101.