Murder to save $$....I don't think so.
Hell, I haven't killed anyone yet and I've got 13 firearms. Must need better bait.:hmm:
Ausm, would you like to come over for dinner? It's a hoodie/skittles party. Welcome to my parlor.
Oh hey, looks like those two low lifes had burglarized at least one other home in order to feed their addiction.
Worthless human garbage.
Oh hey, looks like those two low lifes had burglarized at least one other home in order to feed their addiction.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...16c2e4-3960-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_story.html
Worthless human garbage.
I think in this circumstance, given they decided to put their lives in another persons hand by breaking into someones residence, and given he's in the heat of the moment, he should get no more than 5 years? Why serve time at all? Because executing them wasn't absolutely necessary.
Other than not calling the police right away (maybe he is really that nice in regards to not bugging them), and executing them, I'm fine with him waiting for them. The second they decided to become scum, they open themselves up to being treated like scum. Sometimes you need to wait scum out to see where it needs attention the most...
Chuck
Unfortunately, for them they entered his wacky domain..sorry, no real sympathy for them
I do think he should be punished albiet mildly...he was not the one who initiated the event...
Oh hey, looks like those two low lifes had burglarized at least one other home in order to feed their addiction.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...16c2e4-3960-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_story.html
Worthless human garbage.
1: Good initial shooting
2: Bad execution following
Wetzel said that while the shootings happened on Thursday, Smith waited until Friday to report the deaths, explaining that "he didn't want to trouble us on a holiday."
Direct to prison. You can use lethal force only if your life is threatened.
Link? I thought the only exception was rape.
Art. 236. Justification of parents assault in defense of children.
Fathers and mothers may justify themselves in an action begun against them for assault and battery, if they have acted in the defense of the persons of their children.
§21. Aggressor cannot claim self defense
A person who is the aggressor or who brings on a difficulty cannot claim the right of self-defense unless he withdraws from the conflict in good faith and in such a manner that his adversary knows or should know that he desires to withdraw and discontinue the conflict.
§20. Justifiable homicide
A homicide is justifiable:
(1) When committed in self-defense by one who reasonably believes that he is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that the killing is necessary to save himself from that danger.
(2) When committed for the purpose of preventing a violent or forcible felony involving danger to life or of great bodily harm by one who reasonably believes that such an offense is about to be committed and that such action is necessary for its prevention. The circumstances must be sufficient to excite the fear of a reasonable person that there would be serious danger to his own life or person if he attempted to prevent the felony without the killing.
(3) When committed against a person whom one reasonably believes to be likely to use any unlawful force against a person present in a dwelling or a place of business, or when committed against a person whom one reasonably believes is attempting to use any unlawful force against a person present in a motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1(40), while committing or attempting to commit a burglary or robbery of such dwelling, business, or motor vehicle. The homicide shall be justifiable even though the person does not retreat from the encounter.
(4) When committed by a person lawfully inside a dwelling, a place of business, or a motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1(40), against a person who is attempting to make an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, or who has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, and the person committing the homicide reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the entry or to compel the intruder to leave the premises or motor vehicle. The homicide shall be justifiable even though the person committing the homicide does not retreat from the encounter.
So he had the both the heat of the moment, and the time to sit there and wait for one to descend the stairs, shoot them multiple times, and then get the gun juuuuuust right to finish them off.
The only reason he wouldn't call the cops right away is that he had something to hide. That bullshit line about not wanting to bother the police is amazing. Can't believe anyone would be dumb enough to believe it, but then again, its this forum.
LOL! Ok, what he did is not funny at all but this has batshit crazy written all over it. I mean, who in the hell brags about quite literally executing people to the cops?
As far as the OP acquitting him, WTF is wrong with you? Frankly, I like that our gun laws are becoming less restrictive and give law abiding citizens greater ease and leniency of acquiring and using firearms for self defense. This kind of shit will get the ole emotions going and turn that trend around real quick if the gun nuts start screaming "good shoot".
Exactly. Unless he's a stone cold psycho, his system would still be jacked with adreneline, and it's not like he had to wait hours for the other to come down the stairs...so it's not like he had time to come down from that high. If these scum wanted to not have a risk of getting shot, they could have taken the shocking action of not invading someones home. No big crocodile tears found...
Maybe he just didn't want to be bothered ruining the rest of his day, or someone elses? Sounds like he was just being considerate. () Prove otherwise...
Chuck
No big crocodile tears found...
If everything is true in the story, I do not believe the two burglars should be dead but let put the blame squarely on where it should be, on the burglars.
If they did not break into other people's houses, they would be alive today. Period.
I'm sure this is not the first time you hear this but I think you have mental issues.
You don't think being in a situation where your home is being invaded, let alone you're going to have to possibly/probably shoot people, isn't going to produce an adreneline high? Got some ice in your veins there son...
Chuck
If he gets charged and convicted with murder for executing two people after they were no longer a threat then hey no crocodile tears here about that.
Of course I guess in your world two wrongs do make a right.