Honda's new Slogan

[NFS4]

Honda's new slogan :laugh:

 

[Cobalt]

"You SUCK!" - Stewie. At the linkage of course.

 

[Demo24]

lol

 

[NFS4]

Works for me.

 

[Transition]

I love Honda.

 

[Nikamichi]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Honda's new slogan :laugh:

 

[sniperruff]

funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

 

[lobadobadingdong]

Originally posted by: DEMO24
lol

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

 

[RiDE]

Says the guy who drives a Camry.

 

[sniperruff]

Originally posted by: RiDE
Says the guy who drives a Camry.

and here i am without a car and have only driven less than 30 minutes since i got my lisence 2 years ago, posting on lots of car threads. thank god for the internet!

 

[acemcmac]

interesting

 

[CrystalBay]

Clara Peller's turning in her grave.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

rx8: 159 @ 5500 RPM

only 3 less, but 1000 rpm lower. the s2000 wins the gutless award by a hair!

 

[Fingers]

HAHAHA

And all this time I thought you were just a ricer loving fanboy.
Respect now increased by one notch.

 

[rh71]

hmmm... even the 1989 4-banger accord my dad had... had good torque...

 

[Fingers]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

rx8: 159 @ 5500 RPM

only 3 less, but 1000 rpm lower. the s2000 wins the gutless award by a hair!

Torque is almost pointless at anything over 2500 RPM and most usefull under 2000.

 

[mAdD INDIAN]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

that's a lot of torque for a 2.2L. I wish the 2.2L in our 99 Camry made that much torque, and it's a 3200lb sedan!

 

[TheLonelyPhoenix]

Originally posted by: sniperruff
that slogan suits the RX8 better.

It doesn't do bad at all for 1.3 L of displacement.

 

[CrackRabbit]

Hasnt That ALWAYS been Honda's second slogan?

 

[Baked]

Meh, at least it doesn't have the "Got Recalled" slogan like all the american cars.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: TheLonelyPhoenix

Originally posted by: sniperruff
that slogan suits the RX8 better.

It doesn't do bad at all for 1.3 L of displacement.

Apples and oranges...

 

[TheLonelyPhoenix]

Originally posted by: CadetLee

Originally posted by: TheLonelyPhoenix

Originally posted by: sniperruff
that slogan suits the RX8 better.

It doesn't do bad at all for 1.3 L of displacement.

Apples and oranges...

He started it.

 

[thomsbrain]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

toyota's 2.4L makes 0.6% more torque from 9% more displacement. nissan's 2.5L makes 11% more torque from 14% more displacement. mazda's 2.3L makes 8% LESS torque from 4.5% more displacement.

meanwhile, the honda engine makes 50% more power than the toyota and mazda engines and 37% more power than the nissan. personally, i'll take 37% more power for 11% less torque, and i'll definetely take 50% more power for 0.6% less torque! really, you have to view the honda engine as a wimpy V6, because it outclasses every NA 4-cylinder around. that could still be a problem when compared to V6 cars, but because the S2000 is so much lighter than anything that might compete with it, it's not that much of a problem after all. and yeah, it's not as fast "in town," but if you're not a pimple-farmer looking to impress the local high school parking-lot crowd, you save your ass-hauling for places where it's safer, like backroads or open highways. and it's there that the S2000 is a better driver's car than anything else for the money. but hey, if you don't like to drive, i'd agree that it's a bad choice. you might be happier with a camry or buick.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: thomsbrain

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: sniperruff
funny but you have to admit 240 horses from a naturally-aspirated 2 liter is pretty awesome. not to mention its design is just so sexy...

that slogan suits the RX8 better.

2.2 liter now. Only 162 lb-ft @ 6500 RPM

toyota's 2.4L makes 0.6% more torque from 9% more displacement. nissan's 2.5L makes 11% more torque from 14% more displacement. mazda's 2.3L makes 8% LESS torque from 4.5% more displacement.

meanwhile, the honda engine makes 50% more power than the toyota and mazda engines and 37% more power than the nissan. personally, i'll take 37% more power for 11% less torque, and i'll definetely take 50% more power for 0.6% less torque! really, you have to view the honda engine as a wimpy V6, because it outclasses every NA 4-cylinder around. that could still be a problem when compared to V6 cars, but because the S2000 is so much lighter than anything that might compete with it, it's not that much of a problem after all. and yeah, it's not as fast "in town," but if you're not a pimple-farmer looking to impress the local high school parking-lot crowd, you save your ass-hauling for places where it's safer, like backroads or open highways. and it's there that the S2000 is a better driver's car than anything else for the money. but hey, if you don't like to drive, i'd agree that it's a bad choice. you might be happier with a camry or buick.

WTF! You guys are taking this stuff too seriously. It's just a funny pic that I saw on another forum that I decided to post and you guys are over analyzing it to the max :roll: