Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: dclive
Even then I just don't see it. I do lots of encoding on that AMD box too. It's on 24x7, so I can run encoding in the background (it sits there twiddling its' thumbs 90% of the day anyway) and nothing is impacted and nothing slows down. It's not as if I'm waiting on the encoding...
Anyway, sounds like this is a 'to each their own' thing, but I don't see the benefit. For games, sure. For video work, sure. But for a box that is on 24x7 anyway, to take an extra 30 minutes per hour of video to encode.... I just don't see why anyone would care, assuming you aren't encoding 18 hours or so per day of shows.
The first bolded is very true... Each their own. The second is misleading, depending on video size. My AMD X2 3800+ is at least, 4x slower at encoding than my Q6600. That is a huge time savings when dealing with H.264 or even Xvid. That equates into a lot more than 30 minute time savings. Of course, the size of the video and the quality selected changes the actual time saved, but the percentage remains the same.
The important aspect when discussing these items is understanding that even though you or myself do not see a huge need for it, others do. There is always another side and generally, it is also quite logical and sound.
I am OCD, so I would probably never use a Quad in an HTPC because I would want it very quiet, pretty and silent.
Another aspect to view is that some HTPC's are people main machines. So, the extra power will certainly not go to waste.