Any particular reason ? I have a Seagate too but I thought the 8MB WD is fasterOriginally posted by: solarsx
i'd rather have the Barracuda with 2MB buffer... i have 7 and prefer them over WD ...
Originally posted by: Nikepete
Any particular reason ? I have a Seagate too but I thought the 8MB WD is fasterOriginally posted by: solarsx
i'd rather have the Barracuda with 2MB buffer... i have 7 and prefer them over WD ...
Originally posted by: yodayoda
1) Seagates have some of the lowest fail rates in the bix, Western Digital the highest
2) WD has the worst return time of hard drives (maxtor=3 days, seagate=NA (never had to return), IBM=2 weeks, WD=4 weeks)
3) WD are the loudest hard drives, seagates are the quietest
speed isn't everything dude.
1) Seagates have some of the lowest fail rates in the bix, Western Digital the highest
2) WD has the worst return time of hard drives (maxtor=3 days, seagate=NA (never had to return), IBM=2 weeks, WD=4 weeks)
3) WD are the loudest hard drives, seagates are the quietest
speed isn't everything dude.
Originally posted by: Nikepete
1) Seagates have some of the lowest fail rates in the bix, Western Digital the highest
2) WD has the worst return time of hard drives (maxtor=3 days, seagate=NA (never had to return), IBM=2 weeks, WD=4 weeks)
3) WD are the loudest hard drives, seagates are the quietest
speed isn't everything dude.
It's baloney, the sounds of the case fan and CPU's fan mask the HD's sound anyway. I have an IBM and an Seagate in my system, all 7200 rpm, can't hear any HD noise, just fan noise.