Tried googling her parents. No details given. But she’s been a WH intern since 2015 apparently
"I couldn't foretell that Trump would be the same person he has always been."After he was in office he did a lot of things I disagreed with. He has no filter and is overly crude.
I don't have "regrets" about anything. Unfortunately I don't have a crystal ball and cannot fore tell the future as many on the left seem to claim they are able to do.
I personally hope that Trump doesn't run again. I also hope that Biden or Harris don't run either. I would find it hard to vote for Trump again, Biden is past his use by date and Kamala Harris is worthless by any measure. I can't imagine she being President of the US.
Just "a source" but this case needed to already be airtight given that they're going on sworn testimony only...and now this gives the RW ecosystem another get out of jail free card...
Just "a source" but this case needed to already be airtight given that they're going on sworn testimony only...and now this gives the RW ecosystem another get out of jail free card...
"a source" says something does absolutely nothing to refute what is already on the record. And it won't, until such time as those in question are actually stating that under oath.
Put it this way ... a congressional committee, made up of tons of lawyers, assisted by committee COUNSEL, have 1000s of ON THE RECORD sworn statements. Do you think that all of those combined would have put this woman on live national TV without having corroborating statements? For reference, in this specific story, she's relaying what she was told by another individual (Ornato). One who also has been interviewed by the committee. Now, what do you think he told them in his testimony? Could it be exactly what she stated???? Hmmmm ... I wonder ...
While I make no claim to be any sort of expert on the Presidents various Limousines or SUV’s or whatever modes of transportation that require a driver. I do imagine them all having video cameras in them.
Indeed. If it was the limo, how could he even reach the steering wheelPoint of note in all the RWNJ rebuttal to her testimony today about the incident ... including a diagram (that actually refutes their points as well) ... they obviously didn't pay attention at all because they're all referencing it being the limo. While the testimony, including video, went out of the way to show it was an SUV.
So you knew what he was going to do (bad stuff) before he was in office.
POTUS orders SS to goto a stripclub, they won’t listen. The orange monkey wants a Big Mac, they won’t just go to any random location until vetted.
Indeed. If it was the limo, how could he even reach the steering wheel
I don't believe she stated (and again, not her witnessing it) that he reached the wheel. Just that he lunged for it. Point being, in the graphic being used by the RWNJs it even states there is a partition that POTUS controls. Lunging could still be possible.
From what a I heard it wasn’t the full size limo. It was closer to an SUV
To quote President Trump. "That is the best piece of ass you will ever get." He was referring to Corey Lewandowsky and his sexual liaison with Hope Hicks. But my mind is in the gutter you say.So because she was a young woman, you just jump to the conclusion that she was there for sexual reasons? Something's wrong with your brain if that's the thing you jump to right away.
View attachment 63710
As for being on a first name basis - not seeing an issue with that. Some people just operate that way. I didn't call everyone Mr/Ms/Dr or whatever positions I was in once it was immediately made clear to just use people's given names; why would the White House operate any differently?
You're the one that suggested in this thread that the young White House staffer was a sexual object for the White House, with no rationale to support such a claim, so it sounds like a you problem.To quote President Trump. "That is the best piece of ass you will ever get." He was referring to Corey Lewandowsky and his sexual liaison with Hope Hicks. But my mind is in the gutter you say.
So either several people have lied under oath, or one or more people who haven't been under oath are stating they're willing to lie under oath.
So either several people have lied under oath, or one or more people who haven't been under oath are staying they're willing to lie under oath.
They take the 5th to avoid the perjury trap. They use the threat of years in prison for lying under oath. To avoid the perjury trap, they plead the 5th to avoid incriminating themselves whether they are innocent or guilty. When they present a witness using hearsay as evidence. That is done to compel potential witnesses with first hand knowledge to testify under oath.Yes. Everyone that has testified under oath is lying. And everyone that has refused/fought subpoena/taken the 5th is telling the truth.
No, you went with some lame ass "I never regret anything" non answer and then rambled about trump being crude and Joe Biden being old or something. You'll do anything to avoid admitting you were wrong and made a mistake lol, classic conservatism.No I didn't. Don't blame me if your reading skills are lacking.
You asked if I had any regrets and I answered in my response as quoted here:
"I don't have "regrets" about anything. Unfortunately I don't have a crystal ball and cannot fore tell the future as many on the left seem to claim they are able to do. "
No, the SS sources (Bobby Engel and the driver) aren't pleading the 5th. They came forward as willing to testify under oath what others have testified about under oath, so someone's lying.They take the 5th to avoid the perjury trap. They use the threat of years in prison for lying under oath. To avoid the perjury trap, they plead the 5th to avoid incriminating themselves whether they are innocent or guilty. When they present a witness using hearsay as evidence. That is done to compel potential witnesses with first hand knowledge to testify under oath.
If you tell the truth, there's no perjury trap. Funny how that worksThey take the 5th to avoid the perjury trap. They use the threat of years in prison for lying under oath. To avoid the perjury trap, they plead the 5th to avoid incriminating themselves whether they are innocent or guilty. When they present a witness using hearsay as evidence. That is done to compel potential witnesses with first hand knowledge to testify under oath.
No, you went with some lame ass "I never regret anything" non answer and then rambled about trump being crude and Joe Biden being old or something. You'll do anything to avoid admitting you were wrong and made a mistake lol, classic conservatism.
Or never watched the WWE.he won’t admit it because voting for trump was totes cool in his book, that’s the rub. Trumps always been trump. Didn’t take a crystal ball or even a semi intelligent person to know what he would be like. To claim otherwise means you’re simply very stupid, or willfully ignorant.