House Speaker election/circus/all ages carnival - ongoing coverage

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,274
4,566
136
Donalds voted for himself. But who is this guy? He’s from Florida, so doubt he’s that good that the Dems could vote for him
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,108
5,984
136
One needs a majority of the actual votes. If one votes present, that lowers the threshold. So safe to assume no GOP will vote him. So he’s stuck with 212. There’s current only 434 members (one seat vacant from death). That means if 11 GOP aren’t there or vote present, Jeffries will have the majority of the votes. So this is what I’m thing the never spineless one may try. Just leave the house floor in one of the rounds. Make it very close to scare the spineless one to actually drop out.

Can't they just strip Jeffries of power later on?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,802
29,553
146
Dems just need to convince 6 repubs to have an unforeseen bout of diarrhea during one of the vote counts in order to push Jeffries through, right?

As long as they don't have to be on record as voting for the evil liberal, should be fine?
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,696
15,933
136
Dems just need to convince 6 repubs to have an unforeseen bout of diarrhea during one of the vote counts in order to push Jeffries through, right?

As long as they don't have to be on record as voting for the evil liberal, should be fine?
Problem is future committee assignments would vanish
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,274
4,566
136
Dems just need to convince 6 repubs to have an unforeseen bout of diarrhea during one of the vote counts in order to push Jeffries through, right?

As long as they don't have to be on record as voting for the evil liberal, should be fine?

218 if 434. 6 absent only brings it down to 215 of 428. Has to be down to 423 for Jeffries to win.

As for removing Jeffries, the rules package and 5 members to remove the speaker, that only applies to GOP.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,218
4,446
136
No so Muh Hunter Biden investigations?
No Hunter hunt, no investigation of the investigators, no Committee to investigate the Committee. But maybe most importantly for GOP House members no handicapping of the Office of Congressional Ethics.
 
Reactions: dank69

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,496
13,078
136
I think this is the right way to look at it… a continuation of the insurrection.

 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
11,768
8,315
136
Amazing that this is all being coordinated by someone under investigation for underage sex trafficking and a dumber version of Palin with a husband that likes to flash teenage girls in a bowling alley.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,352
7,002
136
I think this is the right way to look at it… a continuation of the insurrection.


Yep making a case of democracy doesn't work so fascism!
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
11,768
8,315
136
Just think, if McCarthy had worked with the Dems to expel the Congressional seditionists who participated in Trump's attempted coup, he would be Speaker now.

Probably not. D's would have likely kept the majority. Not by replacing those cackling hyenas, but from the PR of those removals driving more votes to close races. Only needed a few.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,802
29,553
146
Probably not. D's would have likely kept the majority. Not by replacing those cackling hyenas, but from the PR of those removals driving more votes to close races. Only needed a few.

yeah, McCarthy might have been voted out of Congress. I mean, if the GOP wants to save the country like they say they do, it really is the only option. But they don't, so they keep supporting seditionists.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
11,768
8,315
136
Oh dear sweet baby Jesus ... who thought it was a good idea to let Boebert speak??? Holy shit. If there isn't a stripper pole or a diarrhea inducing slider involved she shouldn't be anywhere near here.

She can't possibly get through this without saying something blatantly racist, can she?
 
Last edited:
Reactions: rommelrommel
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |