Another thing, that makes them like Comcast in their billing policies.
Their insurance policy, in the electronic documents, lists every coverage benefit, and what the policy cost is of the benefit. The total cost, is the cost of your policy.
So I called their agent a while ago, and tried to lower the cost of my policy. (I have more than state minimums, due to my mother scaring me about stories of "uninsured mexicans" hitting me and suing me on purpose.)
Anyways, I tried to lower my policy costs on one of my coverage benefits by like $600, and the agent said that would only save me $150 off of my total policy cost. Why? The only reason that they could give me, was "discounts". Yet, those prices, in the electronic documents, claim to "include all discounts". (*)
So, in reality, they charge you to the hilt, regardless of your actual coverages, because they "massage" the numbers, to come up with something that matches what your initial coverage agreement was, because they figure that the initial amount that you agreed to, is what you can afford.
It doesn't help that my "assigned agent", lives in a Ritchy-rich town,.
I guess, going in, I didn't realize that getting insurance was like negotiating on a used vehicle.
I'm paying as much in insurance, (without Comprehensive), as my Blue Book value on my vehicle. Every year.
Edit: I guess, I would feel better, and with less animosity towards LM, if they would only be honest with me, and not "beat around the bush", and tell me that they put me in a "high-risk pool", and that's why they've increased my policy costs successively every year, even when I haven't had any tickets or accidents.
(*) For those doing the math, and using logic. If all of the policy benefits costs are added together, and they "include all discounts", then by simple logic, if you reduce the cost of one of them by X, then the total should also go down by X. The fact that they are only going down by Y, when Y is less than X, means that they are raising the cost of the other policy benefits to compensate, or offset for, the decrease in cost of one of them. Which means, that the cost of those benefits is NOT based on risk and risk-sharing, but also, marketing.
One other thing to note is, I have no idea what my credit score is. So, one thing that I've heard is, that insurance companies now charge you, not on your risk factors, but simply, your credit score.
Since my score is probably not too high, that could also explain my insurance costs, although not entirely, if they are "playing with the numbers", as I've previously explained.
But I would appreciate if they were forthright, and told me straight out that the reason that they could only offer me expensive auto insurance coverage, was because my credit score was poor, at least I would know how to improve the situation.