Must be using the same panel as this monitor which i am looking at upgrading my 24'' to maybe
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160349&Description=1440p monitor&cm_re=1440p_monitor-_-24-160-349-_-Product
Its a AOC but practically sounds like it has your same panel,i had a friend with one of these and yeah it appeared perfect for desktop usage.I keep hearing how 4k under 43'' is almost unsable at a close distance as i sit 3 feet away from my current monitor.Only issue is will i be willing to give up 144hz? Just my older games hold 144fps at the moment anyways but 75hz has to be some improvement from 60hz which i have been on like forever outside of my crt days lol.
Um, no don't think so. That's a 1440p where's mine is 4k. If my memory serves me correctly, BenQ bought up an actual panel manufacturer who had their own proprietary revision of IPS which was faster than any other IPS at the time. And BenQ used that exclusively in their own monitors and didn't licence the tech to anyone else. I think there's more 4ms IPS panel manufacturers these days though as this was quite some time ago now.
Whether it's usable depends on your vision/eyesight, how far you sit from your monitor on average and things like the PPI and scaling used. I deliberately went for a larger 32" 4k monitor because it was right on the border for me personally where it was usable in native 4k without any kind of PPI scaling, but then I have reasonably good vision and dont sit too far from my screens.
I use 4k on 27" at work and they're really too small to use in native 4k without some kind of scaling, I currently use 150% scaling to make it more usable. For me 32" is the sweet spot because if you go much bigger than that you start to get lower PPI which for gaming isn't good, it means easier to spot jaggies.