Originally posted by: The Mailman
i love mcdonalds
i eat it often on the way to work. chicken ceasar is great. so are nuggets or chicken fajita's.
i like the really fattening stuff too, tastes great, but gotta have it in strict moderation
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
WTF? Most of their employees don't get health benefits, let alone retirement.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
WTF? Most of their employees don't get health benefits, let alone retirement.
Please tell me you're kidding.
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
WTF? Most of their employees don't get health benefits, let alone retirement.
Please tell me you're kidding.
Okay.
Reminded me of the Mork and Mindy episode when Mindy mentioned the ERA...
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
WTF? Most of their employees don't get health benefits, let alone retirement.
Please tell me you're kidding.
Okay.
Reminded me of the Mork and Mindy episode when Mindy mentioned the ERA...
I haven't seen Mork and Mindy since I was in Junior High school.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I heard they secretly supported the IRA!
WTF? Most of their employees don't get health benefits, let alone retirement.
Please tell me you're kidding.
Originally posted by: SolMiester
Originally posted by: Amused
Totally serious.....
:laugh:
Originally posted by: LongCoolMother
Okay, I know what you're all going to say, McDonalds serve the nastiest food under the heavens and you wouldn't stomach it for $10000.
But I think McDonalds is rather tasty, even delicious. Sure, the food is godly in how unhealthy it is, but let us just forget that for a second. Many of us can hardly rightfully claim that we eat healthy foods on a regular basis.
I personally love McDonalds. I hardly eat it, but that is not because I think the food is nasty. Heck, I prefer McDonalds over Inn 'n Out, to be honest. Taco Bell is pretty damn good too. So if McDonald's really is so disgusting, how is it so successful? All little kids love McDonalds. In my very honest opinion, McDonalds fries are extremely tasty.
Is the food served there REALLY disgusting? Or is it a 'fad' to hate on McDonalds simply because it is being different? And contrary to the other thread, most of the McDonalds that I have been too have been fairly clean and provide fast service. Much more so than the Carls Jrs around here. Of course, we have to keep things in perspective.... it IS a fast food chain. It is one thing to diss McDonald's because the food tastes bad, but it is another to diss them because it is unhealthy.
BTW. I don't have any affiliation with McDs besides the fact that I love an occasional double cheeseburger and small fries. I don't know anyone who owns/works at/operates/etc. at a McDonalds.
Originally posted by: Amused
You actually believe that people think a Whopper is better for them than a Big Mac?:roll:Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Amused
No you are the fscking idiot if you don't see it. How hard is it for you to understand that when people criticize McDonalds they are usually talking about the whole Fast Food industry? McDonalds just happens to be the leader of that industry so they make a great target for the just criticism.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Amused
I know buddy but what you don't seem to understand is that your constant defense of McDonalds gives that impression.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
.
Only if they're a fscking idiot.
Oh yeah, how about the number of people in this, and other threads I've had to prove that their fav competitor or sit-down joint is just as bad? How many of them were positive McDonald's was uniquely bad for them?
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: mrzed
Originally posted by: Amused
No, I never missed the point of your post. You missed the point of mine. Burgers, fries and fast foods predate the obesity epidemic by more than 30 years.
But portion sizes (at most restaurants) have increased during that entire time.
Originally posted by: Amused
The "ill effects" Spurlock suffered had nothing to do with what foods he ate, but how much he ate.
How do you know this? Are you God? Like I said, it was a movie, not a carefully controlled study. A controlled study would change one variable at a time. Because this case did not, we will never know how to apportion the blame for the effects.
Because the symptoms he suffered were identical to those suffered by people and animals that are force fed. It doesn't take a god to figure it out... just a brain.
Originally posted by: mrzed
Originally posted by: Amused
You actually believe that people think a Whopper is better for them than a Big Mac?:roll:Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Amused
No you are the fscking idiot if you don't see it. How hard is it for you to understand that when people criticize McDonalds they are usually talking about the whole Fast Food industry? McDonalds just happens to be the leader of that industry so they make a great target for the just criticism.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Amused
I know buddy but what you don't seem to understand is that your constant defense of McDonalds gives that impression.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
.
Only if they're a fscking idiot.
Oh yeah, how about the number of people in this, and other threads I've had to prove that their fav competitor or sit-down joint is just as bad? How many of them were positive McDonald's was uniquely bad for them?
Maybe if you read the thread, Red, you'd not be looking like such a fool right now.
In fact, you came in right at the end of a debate with someone who swore an In-n-Out burger was better for him than McDonald's. Then he claimed his Jack in the Box burger was better for him.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: mrzed
Originally posted by: Amused
No, I never missed the point of your post. You missed the point of mine. Burgers, fries and fast foods predate the obesity epidemic by more than 30 years.
But portion sizes (at most restaurants) have increased during that entire time.
Originally posted by: Amused
The "ill effects" Spurlock suffered had nothing to do with what foods he ate, but how much he ate.
How do you know this? Are you God? Like I said, it was a movie, not a carefully controlled study. A controlled study would change one variable at a time. Because this case did not, we will never know how to apportion the blame for the effects.
Because the symptoms he suffered were identical to those suffered by people and animals that are force fed. It doesn't take a god to figure it out... just a brain.