How effective are COTS RF amplifiers?

nd

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,690
0
0
Does anyone have any experience with using RF amplifiers to improve CATV signal quality? I've seen some cheap ones for around $10 from Philips (e.g. this), but I'm skeptical as to how effective it would be.

I know the "passive" style splitting amplifiers work well to give a better signal strength to one output vs. another, but these 1-to-1 kind that you plug into a power source are less familiar.

I'm considering using something like this to improve the video quality seen with my Hauppauge PVR-500 tuner. In my case, I have a splitter feeding one output to the TV directly, and the other to the tuner card -- but the tuner card produces much worse quality than my TV. Plugging into the wall directly doesn't seem to noticeable improve things.

I got the idea to use an amplifier when someone mentioned the tuner chip on the PVR-500 is unusually sensitive to noise. Would you expect an RF amplifier to improve things at all? Even though these devices claim to boost signal quality, I don't see why they wouldn't just amplify the noise already on the line since it's just an amplifier.
 

djhuber82

Member
May 22, 2004
51
0
0
It might help. You are correct that an amp will amplify noise already on the line, but the tuner card contributes its own noise and amplifying the signal will reduce its impact. Generally you only need an amp if you are splitting the signal many times. If you don't see any improvement by pluging the tuner card directly into the wall (which should give you 3dB more power to the card than splitting) then an amp probablly won't help much. Your problems might be stemming more from out-of-band interference than from broadband noise, in which case a filter would do more to improve signal quality than an amplifier.
 

nd

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,690
0
0
Thanks for the feedback.

In the case that it was out-of-band interference, what kind of filter did you have in mind? Just a band-pass for the CATV range?
 

djhuber82

Member
May 22, 2004
51
0
0
Yeah, that should do it. Keep in mind that if you do use a filter you might also have to use an amp to overcome the filter loss.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |