J JustaGeek Platinum Member Jan 27, 2007 2,827 0 71 Aug 1, 2007 #2 Sorry, but you missed a very important amount - 3GB. IMHO, this is the sweet spot for the 32-bit OS.
B BillyBobJoel71 Platinum Member Mar 24, 2005 2,610 0 71 Aug 1, 2007 #3 You missed 768 (.75 gb), 1.5 gb, and 2.5 gb
T Tarrant64 Diamond Member Sep 20, 2004 3,203 0 76 Aug 1, 2007 #4 Originally posted by: JustaGeek Sorry, but you missed a very important amount - 3GB. IMHO, this is the sweet spot for the 32-bit OS. Click to expand... QFT
Originally posted by: JustaGeek Sorry, but you missed a very important amount - 3GB. IMHO, this is the sweet spot for the 32-bit OS. Click to expand... QFT
cmdrdredd Lifer Dec 12, 2001 27,052 357 126 Aug 1, 2007 #5 Originally posted by: JustaGeek Sorry, but you missed a very important amount - 3GB. IMHO, this is the sweet spot for the 32-bit OS. Click to expand... 32bit is so 2006 Gimme 4GB+ and x64
Originally posted by: JustaGeek Sorry, but you missed a very important amount - 3GB. IMHO, this is the sweet spot for the 32-bit OS. Click to expand... 32bit is so 2006 Gimme 4GB+ and x64
P pallejr Senior member Apr 8, 2007 216 0 0 Aug 1, 2007 #6 genereally speaking, a 32-bit OS can go way higher. It is just a question of support, which the desktop editions of Windows lacks
genereally speaking, a 32-bit OS can go way higher. It is just a question of support, which the desktop editions of Windows lacks
W Wicked Akuba Member Jul 31, 2007 54 0 0 Aug 2, 2007 #8 I don't think that someone use 32GB of RAM on desktop.
N Noema Platinum Member Feb 15, 2005 2,974 0 0 Aug 8, 2007 #9 Originally posted by: Wicked Akuba I don't think that someone use 32GB of RAM on desktop. Click to expand... Ask bsobel Anyway, I'm running 4GB here on Vista 64-bit.
Originally posted by: Wicked Akuba I don't think that someone use 32GB of RAM on desktop. Click to expand... Ask bsobel Anyway, I'm running 4GB here on Vista 64-bit.