How much does your solar roof cost?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
They have both solar and non-solar tiles that look identical. So, you cut the non-solar tiles when you need to go around some obstruction. Tesla estimates a maximum of 70% coverage of the solar tiles.

While you can place these on an old building (Tesla will tear off your old roof as part of the install), I think their main target market is new homes in areas that don't typically use shingles (slate and tile) which are already high cost ($40k+) installs. This way you can design the house to have a roof that is oriented to the proper direction of the sun.

Solar cells are very redundant, you can use a pair of scissors to cut a cell away and it will still generate electricity. I would have liked them to incorporate that type of ability. Just that you would need multiple cell terminals, if you cut the entire thing in half. 70% roof coverage is not very much. End to End minus plumbing boots/skylights should be much much more than 70%....
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
My biggest curiosity is the mounting method. My strong suspicion is that this will make the roof "proud" by about several inches, so it dosen't lay flat like a tablet on a table, but it has some "standoff" or frame that must be mounted prior....
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,603
12,733
146
It won't, unless they are using some multi-junction space aged solar panels. Much of the cost is in the solar panel packaging. It has some special impact resistant glass on top. The underlying solar cell is probably just a typical Mono-Crystalline cell.

After 30 years of use the solar panel will be depleted and will need replacement. That's roughly around the same time as a roofing shingle. LOL. So there is little difference. You pay 50K for a 10K roof upgrade that will give you around 8K back ROI.

Well, the tiles themselves have an 'infinite warranty', aka until the house collapses or until Tesla isn't a company anymore. So it's more like you pay 50k for a roof that gives you an 8k ROI and you never think about your roof again as an added bonus.

But yes the cell replacement is a valid point. Maybe they'll provide a prorated swap program in 30 years? Or maybe I won't care by then because new stuff will be available?
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
Well, the tiles themselves have an 'infinite warranty', aka until the house collapses or until Tesla isn't a company anymore. So it's more like you pay 50k for a roof that gives you an 8k ROI and you never think about your roof again as an added bonus.

But yes the cell replacement is a valid point. Maybe they'll provide a prorated swap program in 30 years? Or maybe I won't care by then because new stuff will be available?

I don't care about the warranty. As a matter of fact If they offer this w/o the warranty and cheaper I would also take it. I"ve done plenty of research to find that very little goes wrong with solar cells. The inverters would go before the cell and the inverters are also pretty reliable. The battery is just bullshit and I would not want it, it's a LiPoly cell that just charge/discharge. You'd want to grid-tie the system and cell the power back to the company. So your power company would be the battery. They are just using that "infinite warranty" bullshit to get people hooked.

If a tree falls on your roof, your property insurance would take care of the cost likely. My point is that the cost is simply too high for the justification. I've already priced a 18K TRADITIONAL system that has a much quicker ROI, a ROI after 8 years, problem is that it dosen't come out to netzero. This system may come out to netzero, but solar panel efficiency would go up right after you purchase this system. I'm curious what type of solar panels they are using.

I believe solar panel efficiency right now is 15 - 18%. LG sells an expensive panel that has a 25% efficiency. There is kinda like a Moores Law for solar panel efficiency. I think in 5 years or so we will see 30% efficiency for typical price as a 15% now.

They will probably be a solar panel fabric available after 30 years LOL. Or shit, maybe GAP (Home Depot) will have shingles that you just nail to your roof like asphalt shingles that have built in inverters in each shingle. The price would be so cheap that no one cares.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,603
12,733
146
I don't care about the warranty. As a matter of fact If they offer this w/o the warranty and cheaper I would also take it. I"ve done plenty of research to find that very little goes wrong with solar cells. The inverters would go before the cell and the inverters are also pretty reliable. The battery is just bullshit and I would not want it, it's a LiPoly cell that just charge/discharge. You'd want to grid-tie the system and cell the power back to the company. So your power company would be the battery. They are just using that "infinite warranty" bullshit to get people hooked.

If a tree falls on your roof, your property insurance would take care of the cost likely. My point is that the cost is simply too high for the justification. I've already priced a 18K TRADITIONAL system that has a much quicker ROI, a ROI after 8 years, problem is that it dosen't come out to netzero. This system may come out to netzero, but solar panel efficiency would go up right after you purchase this system. I'm curious what type of solar panels they are using.

I believe solar panel efficiency right now is 15 - 18%. LG sells an expensive panel that has a 25% efficiency. There is kinda like a Moores Law for solar panel efficiency. I think in 5 years or so we will see 30% efficiency for typical price as a 15% now.

They will probably be a solar panel fabric available after 30 years LOL. Or shit, maybe GAP (Home Depot) will have shingles that you just nail to your roof like asphalt shingles that have built in inverters in each shingle. The price would be so cheap that no one cares.

You're 100% right on all of the above, but Tesla is marketing this as 'The Apple Solution', as in, an easy, pretty, cradle-to-grave solution for people that know nothing about solar, power storage, or probably even ROI in general.

You can make more, faster from an investment of a home-grown solution if you do the research, plan it right, and get some nice high-quality cells, etc. Or you can just give Tesla 60k to put tiles on your million dollar house and not worry about it. It's identical to Apple's approach to everything.
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
You're 100% right on all of the above, but Tesla is marketing this as 'The Apple Solution', as in, an easy, pretty, cradle-to-grave solution for people that know nothing about solar, power storage, or probably even ROI in general.

You can make more, faster from an investment of a home-grown solution if you do the research, plan it right, and get some nice high-quality cells, etc. Or you can just give Tesla 60k to put tiles on your million dollar house and not worry about it. It's identical to Apple's approach to everything.

LOL, we are assuming everyone in ATOT has a million dollar house and a 100K Tesla.

Well, I make a high salary (excess of 6-figures) and live in a large home and I will climb up on my roof, install my solar cells and laugh at my neighbor who spends 60K on something that I spent 18K on.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,603
12,733
146
LOL, we are assuming everyone in ATOT has a million dollar house and a 100K Tesla.

Well, I make a high salary (excess of 6-figures) and live in a large home and I will climb up on my roof, install my solar cells and laugh at my neighbor who spends 60K on something that I spent 18K on.

Yeah, I was being facetious on purpose. Basically in my head I'm thinking of homeowners in southwestern CA buying these installs up in droves. I laugh every time I see someone buy/use an Apple computer as well, but Apple still has more scratch than anyone in the business. This will sell, and well, all while being shitcanned by nerds saying 'you can do it cheeeaaappeerrrr' just like I've been hollering at everyone I know with computers for the last two decades.
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
Yeah, I was being facetious on purpose. Basically in my head I'm thinking of homeowners in southwestern CA buying these installs up in droves. I laugh every time I see someone buy/use an Apple computer as well, but Apple still has more scratch than anyone in the business. This will sell, and well, all while being shitcanned by nerds saying 'you can do it cheeeaaappeerrrr' just like I've been hollering at everyone I know with computers for the last two decades.

You would get a better ROI by calling two solarcity guys to our house, show them the Amazon 55 gallon drum of astroglide and bending over your desk.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,895
12,365
126
www.anyf.ca
In Canada we can't use the calculator, the only option on the site is
Place Your Order for $1,330
But it doesn't say what you are ordering, it just says to enter your info and they bill you 1330$ ...

Oh I was wondering where people were getting their info. I get the same thing.

I've been looking into a more traditional solar setup and using this site to get an idea of pricing: https://www.solarwholesaler.ca/

I measured and I have room for about 3kw on my roof due to shape/shading etc so I figure about 15-20k for a half decent system. The biggest cost is the batteries and power electronics. (inverter/charge controller). I would want at least 2 inverters for redundancy and two big battery strings. I could go cheaper if I downsize on that stuff.
 

kt

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2000
6,015
1,321
136
Something is not right, $98k for solar panel system and $73k net earned over 30yr.
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
You're 100% right on all of the above, but Tesla is marketing this as 'The Apple Solution', as in, an easy, pretty, cradle-to-grave solution for people that know nothing about solar, power storage, or probably even ROI in general.

Wouldn't having a solar roof with a lifetime warranty add value to your house though?
 

TXHokie

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 1999
2,557
173
106
Comparing Tesla with my recent solar install, it would cost about $20k more to get similar power coverage after tax credit and all that. In the grand scheme of things when I need a new roof in 15 yrs that will cost me around $10-15k, it'll be all awash. The tile thing is still a bit too new vs solar panel which has been out a while and a bit more proven. I'd wait for v 2.0 but I still prefer the solar panels sitting with a gap on my roof which acts as a radiant barrier keeping the roof/attic underneath cool as an added benefit.
Like I mentioned in another thread, the cost of going solar for me is just the risk of assuming a loan for the system. The monthly payment before was going to the power company anyway for electricity and now instead get directed to the loan for the system. Won't see any real saving until it's paid off in about 12 yrs then electricity is technically "free" - maybe faster if cost of electricity goes up. The geek in me find it satisfying to generate energy out of thin air and even sending it back to the grid.
 
Nov 20, 2009
10,051
2,577
136
It is
if you want to crudely estimate the surface of the roof you divide the area by the number of stories.
One of the things that I was surprised by the last time I had my roof replaced was the software they had at their disposal to know exactly how my roof was created in terms of square footage and every dormer, etc., on it. This wasn't something they needed to measure, but apparently had very detailed visual data I could only guessed came from some thing like a Bird's Eye view. They even know that the front of my home was two stories and three on the back (daylight/walkout basement).

I would think that Tesla was smart enough to have access to this kind of software/data to simple get a very accurate measure, orientation and type of roof design and place that into an automated workflow on their website. But maybe they are more focused on rockets and cars.
 

TXHokie

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 1999
2,557
173
106
It is

One of the things that I was surprised by the last time I had my roof replaced was the software they had at their disposal to know exactly how my roof was created in terms of square footage and every dormer, etc., on it. This wasn't something they needed to measure, but apparently had very detailed visual data I could only guessed came from some thing like a Bird's Eye view. They even know that the front of my home was two stories and three on the back (daylight/walkout basement).

I would think that Tesla was smart enough to have access to this kind of software/data to simple get a very accurate measure, orientation and type of roof design and place that into an automated workflow on their website. But maybe they are more focused on rockets and cars.

They're pulling rooftop data from Google Project Sunroof here - https://www.google.com/get/sunroof#p=0
 
Nov 20, 2009
10,051
2,577
136
Well, now that is interesting. If I were to enter my address into Google and then proceed to maps, etc. it correctly finds my home. BUT, if I put it into that link it incorrectly identifies my home. Not only is it of a different roof design and home orientation, but the elevation is different and making the analysis moot. Way to go Google, not. How could it identify a home with a wrong street number and wrong street name? Bewildering.
 

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
$140,500 Value of energy
-$136,600 Cost of roof

-$7,000 Cost of Powerwall battery

+$37,000 Tax credit
4614 Roof square footage

$33,900 Net earned over 30 years
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
Every house in the pictures also owns a Tesla. I doubt its marketing.
Only one home there is a real house. The rest are computer generated images. It makes sense considering that the other tiles say "coming soon".

Sent from my SM-J700P using Tapatalk
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
Total nonsense calculator. It makes too many assumptions that could be way off. Such as assuming everyone in a state has the same electricity rate. I pay about 40% less per kWh than the average in California thanks to having municipal power. Where I live solar roofs would never make sense due to low cost power we have
 

Stopsignhank

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2014
2,336
1,530
136
The cost of my roof is $87,800 and the battery is $7,000. Total of $97,800 less the tax credit. This will cover the maximum amount of my bill, 50%. The value of the energy is $149,000 for 30 years.

I installed solar on my house 2 years ago for a cost of $32,000 less the tax credit and last year it covered 100% of my electricity. So if I go with their roof I can spend 3 times the cost and get half of the electricity. Does not sound like a bargain to me.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,328
126
It won't, unless they are using some multi-junction space aged solar panels. Much of the cost is in the solar panel packaging. It has some special impact resistant glass on top. The underlying solar cell is probably just a typical Mono-Crystalline cell.

After 30 years of use the solar panel will be depleted and will need replacement. That's roughly around the same time as a roofing shingle. LOL. So there is little difference. You pay 50K for a 10K roof upgrade that will give you around 8K back ROI.

Virtually every solar panel you can purchase has power performance guarantees, the industry standard is 80% of rated power at 25 years. Some panel manufacturers offer 30 or 35 year power production warranties with the norm being 75% at 35 years.

Point being is there is literally nothing to break inside the panel beside actual physical damage from an external force. They will continue working long after that warranty expires just at a slightly reduced efficiency over the decades. As a matter of fact, the first solar cell ever made still works to this day.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,328
126
Solar cells are very redundant, you can use a pair of scissors to cut a cell away and it will still generate electricity. I would have liked them to incorporate that type of ability. Just that you would need multiple cell terminals, if you cut the entire thing in half. 70% roof coverage is not very much. End to End minus plumbing boots/skylights should be much much more than 70%....

They probably have to use real roofing material around the perimeter, which needs to be a lot stronger, to meet wind uplift requirements. That would be my guess at least.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,328
126
LOL, we are assuming everyone in ATOT has a million dollar house and a 100K Tesla.

Well, I make a high salary (excess of 6-figures) and live in a large home and I will climb up on my roof, install my solar cells and laugh at my neighbor who spends 60K on something that I spent 18K on.

While you are correct on all of your points in your previous post, one thing that you are missing is that along with the solar you are getting a "tile" roof too. So if your neighbor needed a new roof and decided he wanted tile just a normal tile roof would cost him roughly $40ishK +/- so you have to deduct that from the price of the Tesla roof. Sure you did it cheaper but they got a lifetime roof (well at least tile is and Tesla claims theirs is) AND solar and all you got was solar panels. Not really an apples to apples comparison.

I have designed solar systems for houses that were in desperate need of a reroof which had to be done before the solar install. Since they needed a new roof anyway that cost wasn't included in any ROI projections that I did. Would you argue that I ran the numbers wrong?

This would be something to look at if you are building a new home or about to reroof and considering a high end reroof.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |