Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: NFS4
So the more money you spend, the more you are committed to a person? That's bullsh!t. If I spend $1,000 on a ring and my roommate spends $12,500 on his ring, that doesn't make my commitment any less genuine, serious or real.
Even if I were to spend $500, I don't think it should matter. My dad spent VERY LITTLE on my mom's ring and they didn't even have a honeymoon. But he did use the money he did have to buy their first house which they moved into right after they got married.
So b/c my dad didn't spend a lot of money on the ring, does his "commitment" mean less?
Are you intentionally being dense or what? Let me paint a picture for you because you are missing my point which does not resemble what you wrote above.
If you make a reasonable amount of money and propose with some cheap as hell ring despite the fact that you can afford a pretty nice one comfortably, what do you think that's going to say to the girl you want to marry?
You can argue all you want that it's a meaningless symbol blah blah blah, but if you show up looking like a cheapskate, it's not going to impress upon someone that you are actually committed to them. I can't speak to your dad's situation but if he was loaded and spent nothing on the engagement ring then I would call him a cheapskate.
I never said you have to spend $13,000 but if you spend a ridiculously low amount then you are missing part of the point of the tradition. Why bother buying a ring at all at that point? Just propose without one. Maybe you can put a wheat thin in the box.
As for the "girl contributes nothing"... go ahead and try to win that battle. Good luck. "will you marry me? yes? Ok, I need you to buy me a new computer then."