So someone who saves 20% of their income, gives 10% to charity, pays 17% in taxes and has a mortgage costing 15% of their income (which will be paid off before retirement) doesn't need the 80% of pre-retirement income that most calculators say you need. In fact they could probably live it up big time on 60% of their income.
:thumbsup: I think taxes and savings contributions are things commonly overlooked as well as how much a mortgage payment eats into your income. People think see their spending on 80k a year and think 'Man - I don't have enough to retire and still get 80k from my savings'. What they don't realize is 80k pre-retirement with mortgage could easily = 50k post retirement no mortgage. Just for a reference - For the 4% SWR it results in a reduction of 'required' retirement from $2M down to $1.2M
I think the problem is that most people spend way too much money. This is a more recent development, so the current pool of retirees still know how to live within their means. Once we start seeing the younger baby boomers retire, I think we're going to see a lot of sympathy pieces about low SS benefits and retirees who didn't save enough/at all living on meager rations in low rent apartments. I don't think that saving more than you need to is really a bad thing, but I will be super pissed if I die before retirement and I could have had that Ferrari.
I don't think its a recent trend. There are a plethora of articles out there about how a depressingly large number of 60-70 year olds do not really have enough to cover their retirement. I do think its getting worse though and student loan debt will not help this at all
You think SS will be around when the young people get there?
The SSA says it can pay full benefits until 2033 and 75% of benefits from there until 2086 under current laws. Do you not agree with them?
Last edited: