How old were you when you lost your virginity?

[jkersenbr]

Still a virgin at 22 and will be until my wedding night for religious reasons. Am I missing out? I don't think so. Am I better than anybody else? Nah. Are people different than animals? Yes.

To each his/her own. It's a personal decision.

Along with toolgirl, I am also puzzled as to why anyone involoved in this thread was banned. Off Topic it is, but I see nothing offensive here.

 

[Viper GTS]

Would somebody care to enlighten me as to why epsilon was banned? He was no more argumentative than any other participant in this thread. If you banned him you should have banned me, Napalm, Windogg, & Toolgirl as well for good measure.

I've also posted essentially the same thing in Forum Issues.

Viper GTS

 

[Windogg]

Whoa, didn't notice Epi got the boot. This one is a mystery to me too.

 

[WoundedWallet]

Maybe he wasn't a Junior Member after all.

Just a "regular" conservative trying to stir up trouble under another name.

 

[Viper GTS]

WoundedWallet...

Normally they would have said as much. The only thing they said was to compare Epsilon to a well-known conservative member of this board.

IMHO that's not justification for banning.

Viper GTS

 

[Windogg]

I'm sure the mods have their reasons. There is always a possibility that this guy is a troll since he was asking about GUTB too. Funny how how he seems to be at the center of trouble.

Windogg

 

[Napalm381]

Windogg, admit it. You're a mod and you banned him

 

[Windogg]

Nope, not a mod.

Also check out his sig. If that's not a troll than my "troll-patrol" instinct is wearing thin.

Windogg

 

[Viper GTS]

Windogg...

If they had their reasons that's fine... But if they had no further reason for banning him than this thread then there were several of us who could have been nuked.

Viper GTS

 

[ArkAoss]

REMOVED AN ODD Question and I dont feel like keeping up sorry if it causes confusion

if you must know what the heck isla is talking about, PM me I'll let ya know what I asked

 

[rahvin]

<<Yes my friend, they do exist. With a 99% efective rate on condoms, and yet again, a 99% efecive rate on 'the pill', the usage of both quite assuridly eliminates the possibility of having an unexpected child>>

Umm I think you are way off on these statistics. Condoms are only about 79% effective and the pill is about 94% effective.

 

[Soybomb]

rahvin go HERE and read about the effectivness rates, the pill can be up to 99.9% effective, although 95% can be the lower bound of that figure too. Condoms are 86-98% effective. I would venture to guess that the failure rates for both are mostly due to improper usage.

 

[Napalm381]

Used PROPERLY (key word there), the pill is 99.9 percent effective. This number comes directly off the fact sheet provided with a package of birth control pills. Do you care to argue with the manufacturer, and what I assume are a battery of clinical tests they used to determine that number?

Used improperly, the effectiveness rate is quite a bit lower of course.

 

[snoogans]

16

 

[BoberFett]

How did this turn into a lecture on birth control and abstinence? :disgust:

 

[rahvin]

<<rahvin go HERE and read about the effectivness rates, the pill can be up to 99.9% effective, although 95% can be the lower bound of that figure too. Condoms are 86-98% effective. I would venture to guess that the failure rates for both are mostly due to improper usage.>>

Heh, that was off the top of my head, that sounds much closer to what I remember hearing, the comment was more about the condoms being 99.9% effecive which I don't believe they ever could be. The pill is by far the most effective form of birth control, it's really quite amazing.

BTW I was 22 when I lost mine.

 

[ArkAoss]

humm edited out junk

 

[Napalm381]

<< How did this turn into a lecture on birth control and abstinence? >>

You can blame Epsilon for that one...he brought it up

 

[Napalm381]

<< i have a question up there, but ignore it >>

Hey, I have a penis, don't look at me for answers And toolgirl is at work.

 

[ArkAoss]

napalm, i know no girls r on,

 

[Isla]

<< I am wondering is it really that bad the first time (s) for a girl??? >>



OK, I'll bite.

Unless the guy involved is really interested in the girl and her pleasure, what happens is usually a BIG LET DOWN for the girl. I've told the girls in my care that the experience is much like someone blowing their nose in your pants UNLESS there is love and caring involved, in which case you don't mind the mess.

What I hopefully am getting across is that, unless there is mutual love, caring, and respect going on, it's not much more than being a disposable tissue for a girl. Hence, my stance that yes, people should wait until certain criteria in a relationship is met.

 

[Napalm381]

<< that the experience is much like someone blowing their nose in your pants >>

ROFLMAO

Sorry, that image just cracked me up.
&quot;Hold still honey, I have to blow my nose in your underwear.&quot;

 

[Isla]

LOL, Napalm...

You should have seen the looks on their faces I gave them The Talk. No moralizing, no preaching... Just the gory details. Much more effective, I think.

One day, the right guy will come along and they will want him to sneeze in their nether regions!

 

[ArkAoss]

thanx for your wisdom isla, i kinda knew about how hard it could be emotionally for girls, and thanx for posting a respectfull reply for such an odd ques

 

[Napalm381]

<< they will want him to sneeze in their nether regions! >>

Errrrrrrrr...whatever floats your boat!