How reliable is this site?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,699
29
91
Originally posted by: Ken90630
Originally posted by: bob4432
no offense taken

i base my recommendations on my personal and friends upgrade pattern, which is usually something majory every 9-18mos (in my case cpu went from a 75Mhz -> 450MHz -> 750MHz -> 1GHz -> xp2000 -> 2.8C P4 -> Opty 144 -> X2 3800, and gpu went - voodoo 3000 -> ti4200 -> 9800pro -> x800xtpe -> x1800xt), for me the next step will be moving to ddr2 and whatever cpu brand is better at the time. so i know my stuff gets update pretty often and i have in the past purchased psu that were more in line with what i needed at the time only to buy another one 9mos later. soon i had bunch of psus lying around and i was handing them out to friends as i no longer had a use for them, but if i would have bought a larger 1 farther back, i would have saved myself hundreds of $$$ throughout the course, not thinking i would upgrade as much as i did.

Hi, Bob,

I understand your line of thinking here completely. What I would assert, however (and again, no offense ), is that maybe you thought you needed to upgrade some of those earlier PSUs when maybe you didn't. Realistically, if your previous PSUs were high quality 300-watters or greater, and had enough amps on the 12V rail, you could have continued to use them with your upgraded CPUs and vid cards with no problems. As recently as 2-3 years ago, it was pretty difficult to even build a PC that would draw much over 200 watts. I had a phone discussion with one of the engineers at PC Power & Cooling about this when I was building my first rig, and didn't really understand power requirements, and that's what he explained to me. According to him, the reason they and other companies were making 300-watt PSUs and higher (I asked ) was for the proverbial "breathing room for future expansion." This was around the time the P4s had come out and CPU power requirements were on the rise and we didn't know how those requirements were gonna continue to evolve.

The point I'm trying to make is that even the high quality 400-watt PSUs of today have plenty of "breathing room" for expansion already, since the draw from even high-end, cutting edge single-card system is typically not going to be above even 300 watts (if that). Obviously, it's possible to build a machine with dual vid cards, the fastest chip available, and a whole slew of drives and cathode lights and 8 fans or something that might push peak power demand a bit higher, but how many people are gonna do that?

I guess it boils down to how much "breathing room for future expansion" is enough? 100 watts? 200 watts? 300? :Q Unless there's some unforseen new technology in CPUs and vid cards that will skyrocket power requirements in the very near future, just about anyone on this site could run their rig on, say, a Seasonic S12-430 or even -380 and still have gobs of breathing room for future expansion. Now, if you need extra connectors or something that are typically only found on higher-powered units, that's different. But buy that higher-powered unit for that reason -- not because you believe you truly need the extra power.

In the end, many people are gonna do what they're gonna do regardless of facts. The myth of the need for ulta-high-powered PSUs is so deeply imbedded in so many people's heads that it's hard to get them to change their thinking. What really matters is the amperage available on the 12 rail(s), and the overall quality of the PSU, not total wattage. But whatever .... it's their money and if they wanna throw it away, that's their business. Awhile back (~ a year or two ago?) there was another thread on this subject in which I issued a challenge for someone -- anyone -- to post a profile of system they could build that would draw more than 300 watts (or something like that -- I forget the exact number I used) in real world conditions. The challenge included posting the wattage calculation they would use to arrive at their conclusion. Not one person accepted the challenge.

I'd also venture that many people reading this post (or the article over at SPCR.com) might even realize that they don't really need a higher-powered PSU. But they'll buy one anyway because they don't really understand power requirements and they think they'll be "playing it safe" by having extra power "just in case." So again, whatever .... :laugh:

no offense taken, a good banter is always welcome :thumbsup:. i guess it is the unkown that gets me. not too long ago anandtech ran an article that stated that dx10 cards were going to need 300W just for themselves. thankfully this didn't happen, but we still don't know what ati is comng out with. personally i wish that all the manf would build on the efficiency in both cpu, ram, m/b and gpu but that isn't the case since many times they are all build off the same reference design. i also understand about efficiency when getting closer the output of the psu - i use to be hardcore into automotive audio and my lower W setups would sound cleaner, hit higher dbs and run cooler than others with 2-3x as much power, but with the amount computer stuff changes in just a very short time, that is why i still stand behind my recommendation.

i also forgot to add that i usually run at last 2-3 15k scsi hdds and a couple ide hdds, along with mutliple optical drives, but personally not into the cathode stuff, just not my cup of tea.

i can say that for the home server i am in the process of building which will consist of a skt939 3000venice, 1gb pc3200, probably 1x10k scsi and 3-4 500GB ide hdds in a raid 5 array i did pick up one of the ~80% fsp units due to the fact that i will not be o/cing it or running anything more than a pci gpu on it. i am sure it will definately be in a good place for its efficiency - drawing enough but not too much.

and in the case of my upgrade path, there were 250W-350W, and the p4 topped out pretty low w/ the 350W unit w/ an o/c, but once i moved up to the 480W (and i know it is overkill and not that good of a brand - antec) the o/c went much higher, so that is what i stayed with for the time being.

i need to find a kill-o-watt to get some definitive numbers so the heat output will be the least i just get so freakin tired of all the manf marketing sh!T that doesn't make sense or is even needed - hell i was once a big ocz fan but have written them off due to their crazy marketing campaigns...
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Originally posted by: Ken90630
Originally posted by: happy medium
I agree with the "play it safe people".

Heres a Corsair 620 watt psu for 124.99$ that will handle 2 8800gtx in sli. I'm sure it will handle the r600 also.

http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=373110

And heres the review

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/462/1/

Great psu for the price!:thumbsup:
I use the calculator for a reference. If my new system pulls 400watts, I'd go for a 600watt psu for future upgrades.

Okay, wise guy , I have a few questions for you:

1) Would you say the system in that so-called "review" (not much of a review IMHO) is something many people are going to have? An overclocked, watercooled Intel QX6700 Kentsfield with dual GeForce 8800 GTX video cards in SLI (and a waterpump)? :Q Yeah, that's a realistic, real-world system to base PSU recommendations on.

2) What is that PSU's amp output on the 12V rail(s)?

3) You said, "If my new system pulls 400watts, I'd go for a 600watt psu for future upgrades." Okay, but since most PSUs don't run anywhere near their rated efficiency capability when run way under their load capacity, you're willing to accept much lower efficiency (and therefore more heat) just to have an extra 200 watts for the indeterminate possibility that you might need it down the road? 200 watts?

Oh, and the reason that system in your sig runs perfectly fine on an Enermax 350-watt PSU is that it's prolly drawing somewhere in the neighborhood of maybe 200 watts. How come you're not running a 500-watt PSU in that rig "just to play it safe"?

No offense intended here -- just trying to understand the thinking behind this.

1) I was showing in that review that the power supply had plenty of juice for upgrading at a later date. The man is going to upgrade some day. He even said something about r600 which pulls 240watts alone. What if he want to upgrade to quad core in a year.....thats probrobly another 180watts. Wait now he want to overclock the quad core and the r600 .....thats about 450watts total under load, just between the cpu and gpu,right? Add a couple of harddrives and some optical drives, case fans to keep that bad boy cool and he's over 500watts.

Heres another review
http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=858&cid=9

Heres what some Anantech members have to say.......
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=40&threadid=2021955

Heres what Johnny Guru (very respected guy) has to say
http://www.jonnyguru.com/review_details.php?id=32

2) It has 3- 18 amp rails

3)Most quality psu's like the one I recommended run at 80% efficiency.
I just do the math 400 watts is 66% percent of 600 watts. And yes my system does pull about 200 watts (207 to be exact). So 200 watts is like 67% of 350 watts? Seem about right heh? I really bought my Enermax because it's a good name brand and has a 26 amp 12v+ rail for my video card.

No offense taken

Edit: heres evidence of the r600's, 230watt draw. And take a look at sli'ed 8800gtx's wow!

http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
Originally posted by: Noema
I am building a new rig soon (Summer) and I am looking for a nice power supply to provide the juice.

I found this site which seems very nicely laid out...I tried my projected rig (C2D E6600; 2GB DDR2 RAM, 8800GTX -if prices have dropped by then; I might consider ATI as well if it offers better bang for the buck once R600 is released; I will not be overclocking) and it calculated an usage of about 380W under load, which sounds reasonable. I was thinking of a 600W power supply and for a while, worried about that not being enough; hopefully it will and this site seems to confirm it.

However, how accurate is this? What do the pundits think about it?

Thanks!

None opf the sites that deal with what size PSU you need are very reliable!!

 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: happy medium
1) I was showing in that review that the power supply had plenty of juice for upgrading at a later date. The man is going to upgrade some day. He even said something about r600 which pulls 240watts alone. What if he want to upgrade to quad core in a year.....thats probrobly another 180watts. Wait now he want to overclock the quad core and the r600 .....thats about 450watts total under load, just between the cpu and gpu,right? Add a couple of harddrives and some optical drives, case fans to keep that bad boy cool and he's over 500watts.

Heres another review
http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=858&cid=9

Heres what some Anantech members have to say.......
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=40&threadid=2021955

Heres what Johnny Guru (very respected guy) has to say
http://www.jonnyguru.com/review_details.php?id=32

2) It has 3- 18 amp rails

3)Most quality psu's like the one I recommended run at 80% efficiency.
I just do the math 400 watts is 66% percent of 600 watts. And yes my system does pull about 200 watts (207 to be exact). So 200 watts is like 67% of 350 watts? Seem about right heh? I really bought my Enermax because it's a good name brand and has a 26 amp 12v+ rail for my video card.

No offense taken

Edit: heres evidence of the r600's, 230watt draw. And take a look at sli'ed 8800gtx's wow!

http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354

1) Okay, fair enough -- but with a few minor 'caveats.' First, the r600 pulls 230 watts, not 240. Same difference, practically speaking, but just wanna get the number correct.

Second, the OP specifically said in his original post that he won't be overclocking. Not a huge consideration, but a consideration nonetheless when figuring potential draw on a PSU. Again, just making the correction.

Third, his "projected rig" included a C2D E6600 CPU, with no mention of upgrading to quad core. I based my earlier comments on the info I had at hand.

So he's now well under 500 watts, based on his original "projection" and the info we have to work with, right?

2) Whoa ... that thing could power a small city. :Q (Okay, not really, but still, whoa ....)

3)
3)Most quality psu's like the one I recommended run at 80% efficiency.
The Corsair you recommended might (I haven't researched it), but many "high quality" PSUs run at well under their peak efficiency capability if the system draw on them is too low. That's why more power is not always better -- sometimes it can be worse. Again, it totally depends on the PSU. Page 4 of that "Power Supply Fundamentals" article on SPCR explains this in more detail.

So 200 watts is like 67% of 350 watts? Seem about right heh?
Yeah, you didn't go crazy overboard or anything. I don't know what your PSU's efficiency rating is when run at 67% of its rated output, and I'm guessing you don't either , so I guess we can't comment on that. I suppose I could be a real pinhead here and assert that you could have bought a high quality 300-watt PSU, that had enough amps on the 12V rail, and saved a few bucks, but it wouldn't have made a huge difference. Now if you'd bought a 450- or 500-watt PSU for your rig, I'd be more inclined to question the wisdom of that (unless you had massive upgrade aspirations for the near future).

Dang ... I will say this thread and that AtomicMPC.com site have opened my eyes to the ravenous power requirements of some of the new and upcoming vid cards. I don't game, so I don't keep my finger on the pulse of this stuff that much, and all I can say is, "Whoa." Pretty soon you guys are gonna be needing mini nuclear reactors to power your vid cards. :shocked: :laugh:

Gotta go do battle with a problem machine. Later. :moon:
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |