Define "very tall".
Also state some serious scientific research.
Don't use outlier freak sample size of 7'+ either.
That's like saying obese 400lb live less.....No shit! Any abnormal size metrics are more likely to lead to some issues.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1600586
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094385
Two seconds on Google, but that you pretend to be unaware of this shows that you're just afraid of your inevitable early death (which you should be).
You still
haven't answered my question.
DEFINE TALL.
Then site a scientific study that
specifically proves that TALL COHORT lives less.
.....Then I will come back at you to
argue that you're purposely
using a a size that fits within that study that you link to make your point.......Then I will counterclaim that your "definition" of TALL isn't what
most consider tall and then I will
challenge you to create an
ATOT POLL thread to
define what most people consider "TALL". Then, based on the #1 answer on ATOT, I will
challenge you to find a study that says
that COHORT lives less apples to apples. Then I will
challenge that study with a
counterstudy based on said variables and cohorts applied.
And on and on and on it goes.....
Bottom line: You
cannot win this game. It's unwinable from
either side. Quit while your ahead.
My point as to counterargue the dolt BudAshes that simply claiming tall people are unhealthier and clumsy based on anectodal evidence of his tall clumsy brother does
NOT make
universal fact to lay such a claim. To say otherwise is to come across looking a like fool.
.
.
And
it's too fucking easy to use Google to find some stupid study claiming something
GENERAL to make a point. Yes?...
Here. Lets play.
Let's Google:
"Taller people live longer"
First link in Google:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-53440/Why-taller-people-live-longer.html
Get my drift?
.
.
.
.
.
Now I'm off to the beach.
Enjoy your circle jerk.