I know that the inventor of the MRI is a YEC clearly refuting your baseless charge.
I know that the inventor of the MRI is a YEC clearly refuting your baseless charge......anything.
It isn't a linear progression. Sure, if it was just about adding up small changes you would have a point but there are vastly complex systems you need to explain.
Well that's a problem then, isn't it? You've placed your bar for evidence so far above what is possible within a human lifetime, you'll never see anything. You've put blinders on yourself, that even the scientific process doesn't, which has successfully arrived at testable and verifiable conclusions for centuries.I don't know.
It's a great way to show how little you know about the topic, if that's how you're thinking about it. You cannot compare a baby turning into an astronaut to evolution, it's an incomparable pair of processes. It's akin to comparing mustard to a wheelbarrow.You are mistaken on two fronts. It is a great analogy because it explains the way I'm thinking about the topic. And it isn't a strawman because it just isn't one.
You don't know how analogies work, do you?It's a great way to show how little you know about the topic, if that's how you're thinking about it. You cannot compare a baby turning into an astronaut to evolution, it's an incomparable pair of processes. It's akin to comparing mustard to a wheelbarrow.
I am well aware of the blind faith you people have but demonstrate that the small changes we observe could do what you believe they did do.Again, small changes compiled over long enough time and shaped by environment due to natural selection as to weed out what cannot breed and enforce the breeding and spreading of other changes can absolutely account for the diversity of life.
You just do not WANT to learn how, your end goal is to stay ignorant by just going "nuh-uh".
The true mark of a wanton idiot.
I know that the inventor of the MRI is a YEC clearly refuting your baseless charge.
Compatible analogies, yes.You don't know how analogies work, do you?
That's a much better one. It doesn't have the fun mental imagery of a baby crawling around, but it highlights (pun intended) the process much better.
What color are the words Buckshot?
I am well aware of the blind faith you people have but demonstrate that the small changes we observe could do what you believe they did do.
It assumes a linearity that isn't real. A microbe turning into you would require giant leaps of innovation that is simply an article of your faith.Compatible analogies, yes.
That's a much better one. It doesn't have the fun mental imagery of a baby crawling around, but it highlights (pun intended) the process much better.
Yeah, no it isn't.It's well documented in the theory that you do the best you possibly can to not learn anything about. How the hell do you expect me to teach you something you don't want to learn?
Yeah, no it isn't.
So we're finally reaching the equivalency you've been dancing around, that evolution is just as much 'faith' as religion is, yes? Because you state it is?It assumes a linearity that isn't real. A microbe turning into you would require giant leaps of innovation that is simply an article of your faith.
It assumes a linearity that isn't real. A microbe turning into you would require giant leaps of innovation that is simply an article of your faith.
"Giant leaps" doesn't mean what you think it means in my statement. Your insults are irrelevant.Again with the "giant leaps" that everyone has told you time and time again is NOT a claim within the theory of evolution but just something you pulled out of your dumb arse.
You just keep ignoring everything written and any source and repeat the same dumb shit over and over and over.
No, it is more faith.So we're finally reaching the equivalency you've been dancing around, that evolution is just as much 'faith' as religion is, yes? Because you state it is?
Is that anything more than a guy telling the story of how he thinks it happened? I know what the fairy tale entails.Yes, it is and no amount of your wilful ignorance will change that. I edited to add a link for you to ignore since you REALLY don't want to know anything about the theory of evolution.
Here it is again: https://www.coursera.org/learn/bigh...incredible-diversity-of-life-we-see-around-us
Then continue to wallow in your ignorance and tilt at windmills, while others more educated than yourself develop the things you depend on to exist.No, it is more faith.
"Giant leaps" doesn't mean what you think it means in my statement. Your insults are irrelevant.
No need to get angry that the mechanism which is central to your faith hasn't been demonstrated to be adequate.Then continue to wallow in your ignorance and tilt at windmills, while others more educated than yourself develop the things you depend on to exist.
Is that anything more than a guy telling the story of how he thinks it happened? I know what the fairy tale entails.
Words matter, of course. You're taking "giant leap" out of context.To quote you when you were arguing about the word "proven": "Words matter!"
"A microbe turning into you would require giant leaps of innovation that is simply an article of your faith."
No microbe ever turned into [DHT]Osiris, no microbe ever turned into anything but a microbe.
I don't have a faith, I have reason and logic (which is being tested by my continued existence in this thread). The mechanism of science works as it always has, your understanding of it is what is at fault. The worst part about it is that you actually think you're proving yourself right. You actually think that by me not showing you a youtube video of a collection of amino acids from 6 billion years ago turning into a blue whale swimming in the ocean off the coast of Madagascar is somehow proof that evolution cannot exist.No need to get angry that the mechanism which is central to your faith hasn't been demonstrated to be adequate.
Empty words. Demonstrate that mutations and selection is adequate to produce the results your faith requires or go eat a scone.Yes, it is a man who explains the basics of the theory of evolution.
Unlike religion, scientific theories are not subject to change by the opinions of the one teaching it.
And no, you don't understand evolution at a middle school level, you have demonstrated that thoroughly.
Words matter, of course. You're taking "giant leap" out of context.