I wasn't talking to you.I said I wasn't 100% certain, he probably was born in Hawaii.
yes, cell mutations create entire new species, this has been observed in real time among shellfish, fruit flies and yeast.
Denying reality doesn't make you more intelligent, lacking the knowledge and understanding of basic biology to a point where anyone from every western nation except the US can best you in these topics does not make you more intelligent or loyal to your preferred deity (be it Allah, Shiva or Jesus). It just makes you wilfully ignorant.
Isn't being wilfully ignorant an actual sin in christianity? Don't care though, do you? I mean, you don't care about the faith or the Bible or the words of Jesus, you just go by hatred and ignorance because that is what is important to you.
Who could you be talking about? I didn't say that.Hah, just another thread full of shat, telling others that science makes you stupid. /tinfoilhat
Look at you.I said I wasn't 100% certain, he probably was born in Hawaii.
Yup, there's no way that could have happened in six thousand years. It could only have happened by rolling gene dice for billions of years and most of the changes even there would have been fatal.Microbe to man, pine tree, and blue whale evolution IS nonsense but students need to learn about it. Accepting it makes people dumber than they otherwise would be though.
Cells don't mutate, you daft moron.
Genetic information mutates. The cells don't.What the fuck would you call cancer? Cancer cells are cells that have mutated.
Genetic information mutates. The cells don't.
Care to share some probabilities? Be as specific as you can.Look at you.
Yup, there's no way that could have happened in six thousand years. It could only have happened by rolling gene dice for billions of years and most of the changes even there would have been fatal.
Then they are wrong. The DNA molecule mutates which affects the cell.If you change the genetic information of a cell it is considered a mutation of the cell. If you don't believe me go ask a doctor or nurse.
The cell, the components of the cell, the functioning of the cell and cell proteins, etc, are determined by the DNA instructions.Then they are wrong. The DNA molecule mutates which affects the cell.
Probabilities for what? I just said zero chance in 6 thousand years. but if one were to believe the theory and the billions of years time scale claimed by the theory itself, it would obviously be 100 percent. To the scientific mind evolution isn't a theory, it's a fact. To somebody with your inability to reason normally, you can't see that. You may get excited by some twisted notion of what the theory of evolution is maintain your usual diversionary dance but that all life on earth evolved over time from a simpler form in the past is just obviously true because the human brain evolved also with this simple logic function built in. You just don't see it probably because you are genetically defective or believing would blow a hole in your ego by destroying some nonsensical notion you somehow glommed onto,Care to share some probabilities? Be as specific as you can.
Microbe to man, pine tree, and blue whale evolution IS nonsense but students need to learn about it. Accepting it makes people dumber than they otherwise would be though.
How is that obvious? If you had one million trials a second for 400 billion years you're only going to get 1.26 x 10^25 trials.Probabilities for what? I just said zero chance in 6 thousand years. but if one were to believe the theory and the billions of years time scale claimed by the theory itself, it would obviously be 100 percent.
DNA mutates, not cells. It is a quibble but given the context of a know nothing trying to educate me while deriding my intelligence, I have no problem doing so in this case.The cell, the components of the cell, the functioning of the cell and cell proteins, etc, are determined by the DNA instructions.
If the DNA mutates, the cell itself mutates. The cell itself, including the components, do not function in the normal way, and no longer function as a "x" cell, replacing functioning cells in the specific location, which can cause pain and bodily dysfunction. If the mutated cells, d/b/a cancer are aggressive, they can grow to replace functioning cells and eventually move through the body via blood/lymph, latching onto new sites and replacing more healthy cells with mutated cells.
This isn't politics, it's science. If cells are not functioning correctly because the DNA has a mutation, then the cell itself is mutated in its functioning. Quibbling about what is and isn't mutated in regards to cancer is ridiculous. Best to just move on to being oblivious to political objective observable reality.
Rejection of a hypothesis does not require alternatives.@buckshot24, what is your alternative to the Modern Synthesis?
Not particularly.Care to explain to us 1) why this is ridiculous and 2) what your proposed alternative is?
Rejection of a hypothesis does not require alternatives.
"I don't know" is better than going after something that is obviously false.H0
H1
Try again.
"I don't know" is better than going after something that is obviously false.
Not particularly.