And the Gish Galloper continues.Then prove it mathematically.
No.
You have to demonstrate that it isn't. All of science has already demonstrated that it is far beyond adequate.
Do you understand that?
The ball has only ever been in your court.
This does not continue until you provide actual evidence that it is not. That's it. It's simple. Shut the fuck up until you do your fucking homework.
He just said it was a mathematical certainty. I don't care what zin says.And the Gish Galloper continues.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
Got a second wind, did you? Still trying to hone those Gish skills I see.
Do you not remember what Zin said? Here let me rereaat it for you. You're like the damn climate deniers.
Of course you don't Gish Galloper.He just said it was a mathematical certainty. I don't care what zin says.
Right, I don't care. I don't care about your name calling either.Of course you don't Gish Galloper.
That's what your mentor tells you to say.And you still don't know how your own forum works. You also don't know how mutation and selection is able to create novel biological structures either, you take it on blind faith.
No mentors, say hi to Alex Jones.That's what your mentor tells you to say.
Deny,deny, demonstrate, demonstrate, prove it, prove it.
Keep it up Gish Galloper
Buckshot has done a good job of it.
His mathematical assertions simply don't matter. No matter how improbable it may be, life exists & life evolves. No greater explanation is required.
You can't show this to be true. If all I'm doing is copying and pasting you can easily find my sources.He doesn't know enough math to understand any explanation anyway, he just copy pastes from creationist lit. Liberals literally fall for the fucking dumbest games.
You can't show this to be true. If all I'm doing is copying and pasting you can easily find my sources.
Gish Galloper, that dude's on your side of the political field.No mentors, say hi to Alex Jones.
I didn't say that.
Microbe to man, pine tree, and blue whale evolution IS nonsense but students need to learn about it. Accepting it makes people dumber than they otherwise would be though.
Take your tinfoil hat off. I have no "mentors". You're wrong.Gish Galloper, that dude's on your side of the political field.
You're wrong. I never used any mathematical arguments against the theory. Bowfinger said it was a mathematical certainty, I'm asking for him to show us that.This was your assertion on page 1. From there you've engaged in mathematical gamesmanship in an attempt to bolster your position.
I reject the math entirely because it simply doesn't matter. I accept the modern synthesis because it best explains what we can observe. If it doesn't do so to your satisfaction that's because you want it not to.
You're just playing a variant on the "Teach the Controversy" song & dance.
Care to share some probabilities? Be as specific as you can.
Probabilities for what? I just said zero chance in 6 thousand years. but if one were to believe the theory and the billions of years time scale claimed by the theory itself, it would obviously be 100 percent. To the scientific mind evolution isn't a theory, it's a fact. To somebody with your inability to reason normally, you can't see that. You may get excited by some twisted notion of what the theory of evolution is maintain your usual diversionary dance but that all life on earth evolved over time from a simpler form in the past is just obviously true because the human brain evolved also with this simple logic function built in. You just don't see it probably because you are genetically defective or believing would blow a hole in your ego by destroying some nonsensical notion you somehow glommed onto,
How is that obvious? If you had one million trials a second for 400 billion years you're only going to get 1.26 x 10^25 trials.
Imagine if you had 100 trillion organisms on earth self replicating every second for 4 billion years. That is a grand total of 1.26x10^17 seconds times 100 trillion organisms that is only 1.26 x 10^29th cell divisions. Obviously things that are 1 in 10^30 likely aren't going to happen with 100 percent assurance. So, show me your probabilities because you are making a probability argument.
"I don't know" is better than going after something that is obviously false.
Ignorance is just not knowing about something. Not accepting evolution as a reasonable explanation to the biodiversity we find on earth isn't being ignorant.
Prove the theory wrong with peer reviewed research. It really is that simple.
Anything else is you speaking from a position of willfull ignorance.
Sure thing Gish Galloper.Take your tinfoil hat off. I have no "mentors". You're wrong.
Do you have any idea why my ip keeps getting blocked from accessing the forum? Can't access the forum from my home IP, then I goto VPS to access the site, then post a few times and that one gets blocked. Now I'm accessing from another server. Any idea why I'm getting blocked?Sure thing Gish Galloper.
I never said it was about math, you're lying.To be fair, Buckshot said it was all about the math... until he said it wasn't.