dont play white noise too loudly unless you want to buy some new tweeters. White noise has equal power for every frequency. Pink noise on the other hand, has equal noise per octave. Most tweeters are rated to power handling of musical program material. White noise would have roughly 85% of the power going to the tweeters. at 50 watts per channel, that is nearly 43 watts going directly to the tweeter. Even really high end tweeters (much less a set of 5 computer speakers that sell for less than half the cost of a single high end tweeter) are unsuited to handle that much continuous power. With the Z560s being coaxial speakers, i dont know exactly how this will translate but it surely isn't good.
Pink noise would have equal parts power going to say 16-31hz, 32-63hz, 63-125, 125-250, 250-500, 500-1k, 1k-2k, 2k-4k, 4k-8k, 8k-16k
so 50 watts of pink noise would provide roughly 5 watts to each octave. or 35 watts to the woofers, and 15 watts to the tweeters. These calculations assume crossovers at 2-3khz.
Breaking in electronics is an audio myth. Any sort of fluctuations that would have occured do so milliseconds after you turn it on. Letting your audio gear warm up on the other hand is worth while, not really important in cheap computer speakers though. The bias currents do change drastically under different temperature conditions so it makes sense to allow everything to stabilize. This can take from a couple minutes to a couple hours depending on the circuit. i am thinking computer speaker amplifiers are on the short side of this as they have really small bias currents to begin with and dont heat up as much.
I think speakers can benefit from breaking in because they are mechanical parts. But I think a lot of people would have you believe the effect is much greater than reality. It is going to make the least difference in mass produced parts who's enclosures haven't been compensated for the adjusted T/S parameters. (this would be very time consuming and cost prohibitive to do on a large scale)
The spiders and surrounds are usually stiffer on new speakers, which would lessen the likelyhood damaging the voice coil because it would require more energy for the speaker to bottom out. The stiffer surrounds/spiders can store more energy than one that has been broken in, and the excess energy could be transferred to the chassis or cone in a manner that is not meant to be. This would probably be realized in larger cone resonances, but i am thinking it would be too small for an ear to notice.
jt