- Aug 10, 2005
- 17,768
- 485
- 126
In case you were wondering, this video explains it beautifully!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d7bsCiRFLE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d7bsCiRFLE
Wow 1000 amps? That's insane! I was hoping to see better how it looks like lit up though, preferably in a dark scenery.
Did not figure you could get a good arc with only 70 volts. DC does tend to arc more easily though.
Going to have to try this in small scale some time. Just need to split open a pencil, make a bridge rectifier, and go from there.
It is all about plasma & sustaining current. The strike setups the plasma (the 4th form of matter) in air which is a very low resistance conductor ... the current sustains. The arc per se is very hot & emits light but I think the carbon rods emit most of the light and are consumed which he indirectly indicates.You can sustain an arc with DC at much lower voltage. All you need is strong current.
At 73VDC it's 73kW. The arc is probably getting a fraction of that, the ballast is not very efficient.
It is all about plasma & sustaining current. The strike setups the plasma (the 4th form of matter) in air which is a very low resistance conductor ... the current sustains. The arc per se is very hot & emits light but I think the carbon rods emit most of the light and are consumed which he indirectly indicates.
I wonder what the RF spectrum that is emitted also?
Hmmm, I am a warming globes followerThere are quite a few studies and papers on the physics of the impingement area involving carbon arcs.
The emission is broad and flat. Quite unlike how most men want their women.
Hmmm, I am a warming globes follower
When my dad was a teen he worked at a movie theater that used a carbon arc projector. He wasn't the projectionist but got to play with it a bit. The big thing was to not set the film on fire.
Just don't wet on the globe if it's too hot! It could shatter and burn your junk with hot shards of glass! D: