HomerJS
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2002
- 36,268
- 28,128
- 136
Has the OP EVER expressed concern for the #1 domestic terror threat in the United States? Speaking of crime.
Someone is buying. Just like someone is buying catalytic converters. Those are the criminals. Oh, and people who think buying stuff out of someones trunk, is A OK.The turds doing these grabs and not poor or disadvantaged snatching something for a quick fix. They are organized gangs with high tech communication and planning. Arrests so far have yielded large scale operations with thousands of items stored and some of the items listed for sale on high end consignment websites.
At least one was an mid-upper class white woman running essentially a resale business out of her home.
I long for the days when they spent all their energy spinning records in reverse.Conservative/repub order of worry:
Islamic terrorism
MS13
ANTIFA
flash mobs
I'm still worried about jade helm personally.Are you insane? Spending all your time worrying about them ignores the threat posed by the Deep State and The Caravan!
We're still advocating locking up thieves, just way more interested in ones you give zero fucks about.Any post that does not advocate locking up thieves is a pro crime post.
Headline misrepresents the DA's op ed. He never said, "We’re blaming the wrong things for San Francisco retail theft."Add to the discussion:
SFGate: Chesa Boudin: We’re blaming the wrong things for San Francisco retail theft.
We’re blaming the wrong things for San Francisco retail theft
'These knee-jerk reactions are short-sighted,' Boudin argues in an op-ed for SFGATE.www.sfgate.com
Organized retail theft is not a problem that can be addressed solely by law enforcement solutions — which come after a crime has been committed.
I think you meant any post that advocates not locking up thieves, of which I don't see any. Otherwise a post about a graphics card would be a pro-crime post according to you.Any post that does not advocate locking up thieves is a pro crime post.
Has the OP EVER expressed concern for the #1 domestic terror threat in the United States? Speaking of crime.
Thanks for your input, clown.Whataboutism
It shows you don't really give 2 shits about crime. You only care about crime when it serves the purpose of having a boogeyman to distract people from the greater threat.Whataboutism
Exactly. And I'd like plenty of police. Just much better trained and accountable police.It shows you don't really give 2 shits about crime. You only care about crime when it serves the purpose of having a boogeyman to distract people from the greater threat.
What be more devastating to the country, having some designer watches stolen or having the Democracy stolen?
Having said that I still want the smash and grabbers prosecuted but what is going on with the vote is a much greater threat.
wow great fluff article he goes in every direction almost like hes in a elected position and is worried what people might think of a true opinion. my favorite part wasAdd to the discussion:
SFGate: Chesa Boudin: We’re blaming the wrong things for San Francisco retail theft.
We’re blaming the wrong things for San Francisco retail theft
'These knee-jerk reactions are short-sighted,' Boudin argues in an op-ed for SFGATE.www.sfgate.com
frankly i never said i cared about anything unless you can quote me.. i just wanted to have a discussion, just about every discussion in my life was on things i dont care about, you obviously do too because you are here non stop with comments on a thread you think shouldnt exist.It shows you don't really give 2 shits about crime. You only care about crime when it serves the purpose of having a boogeyman to distract people from the greater threat.
What is more devastating to the country, having some designer watches stolen or having the Democracy stolen?
Having said that I still want the smash and grabbers prosecuted but what is going on with the vote is a much greater threat.
It's almost like he's arguing that addressing the root causes of crime are cheaper and more effective than trying to arrest everyone who's committed petty theft. Same approach as the failed war on drugs.wow great fluff article he goes in every direction almost like hes in a elected position and is worried what people might think of a true opinion. my favorite part was
"Affordable housing, quality education, access to health care and addiction services can provide the stability that empirical evidence has shown actually deters criminal activity."
while yes i agree it does lower crimes but does not change crime of high end items. i guess we have found a solution /sortof.. items glued down (ruined if removed) and a once pay, a locker opens system? how about robots that work at the stores that can perform citizen's arrest (dang a robot most likely isnt a citizen)
frankly i never said i cared about anything unless you can quote me.. i just wanted to have a discussion, just about every discussion in my life was on things i dont care about, you obviously do too because you are here non stop with comments on a thread you think shouldnt exist.
whats more important what i eat for dinner or that you even exist? My dinner so that means go away forever!
We're still advocating locking up thieves, just way more interested in ones you give zero fucks about.
The only people outside stealing my catalytic converter were the lily white meth heads still flying their Trump 2020 flag.
It about time we cracked down on white vs white crime. It's running rampant in our neighborhoods.
Just LAST year we saw the most violent year for crime in recorded history. By all accounts those numbers are down this year.
I wonder what changed.
Right after you get help for your gambling addiction. It makes you into a disgusting human being.Crime is crime. Lock them up too.
In the meantime you should probably get help for your dimebag weed habit. Thats the only thing that would blind you to libearl's soft on crime policies.
Crime is crime. Lock them up too.
In the meantime you should probably get help for your dimebag weed habit. Thats the only thing that would blind you to libearl's soft on crime policies.
Right after you get help for your gambling addiction. It makes you into a disgusting human being.
Working 72 hours a week in the ICU I have no time for your recreational drugs. Most liberals I hear from are very tough on crime and think there should be harsher punishments on crime. Not softer. I have ever heard some liberals say that punishments should include public execution of any government official tried and found guilty of helping to plan and or carry out January 6. That not particularly soft but I am not to blind to know that one guys soft is another man's strong and proud erection.