Not me. Near as I can deduce, mine comes from not fitting in with peers and thus I had to find a different way of understanding society than the one everyone took for granted. I guess I made lemonade from lemons. Probably wouldn't have tried if I were given an orange like just about everyone else.
It's just not really something that lends itself to deduction. It's like intuit and infer, surely, but i'm not a pychatrist, so who knows. Not psychiatrists. 9/10 psychiatrists make the same mistake, which arouses resentment amongst myselves, and possibly others, for psychiatry. I met a psychiatrist who studied theology, for example. Literally. He said it was in order to learn greek and latin, but I suspect it was because he takes religion a bit too seriously :/
I don't know whom the article references in the intro, but much of it looks like general rules with which to identify a nazi. At least that's how I remember the article. If not offered as a joke, they're all flawed, and some offensively stupid. If offered jokingly, then flawed but not stupid, and maybe funny.
What would be the point of this article anyway? To promote fascism. What does it remind us of.... Someone like Pewdiepie is a nazi? Really? What about the truth? If it's just what the new age stupid left say it is, and you're going to intimidate everyone who opposes you, then that seems a lot like fascism, which is why it's a pretty clever article if it's a joke, and a very irritating one if written sincerely. And all the brain-dead cows commenting on how they don't qualify, when the only comment worth making was always, "what the f is the meaning of this?"
Treat everyone individually. Be good to one another!